Advertisement

Accessibility Analysis and Modelling in Public Transport Networks – A Raster Based Approach

  • Morten Fuglsang
  • Henning Sten Hansen
  • Bernd Münier
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6782)

Abstract

Accessibility is an important factor in the development of land-use patterns and urban settlements, and these two components are considered linked close together. With the increasing attention payed to reduction of CO2 emissions, focus has been turned towards increased accessibility to public transportation. The work conducted in this study proposes a simplistic raster based model of accessibility to workplaces based on the public transportation services. The raster GIS based approach was chosen due to the need to combine this model with a raster based land-use simulation framework, where simulations of future urban development could be modelled. It has been shown that the proposed GIS model developed is suitable for representing the spatial difference in terms of accessibility for commuters by public transport within the study area. Clear differences between the Copenhagen Metropolitan area and the outskirts of the region can be seen, and are very much in line with statistics on commuting activities for the municipalities involved.

Keywords

Accessibility GIS raster-based modelling public transportation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    EEA: Climate for a transport change. Report No. 1/2008. European Environment Agency (2008) Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hansen, W.G.: How Accessibility shapes land-use. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 25, 73–76 (1959)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hansen, H.S.: An Accessibility Analysis of the Impact of major Changes in the Danish Infrastructure. In: Harts, J., Ottens, H., And Scholten, H. (eds.) – Proceedings of the 4th European Conference and Exhibition on Geographical Information Systems(EGIS 1993)Genova, pp. 852–860 (1993)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Juliao, R.P.: Accessibility and GIS, pp. 1–11. European Regional Science Association (1999)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Garner, B.J.: Settlement Locations. In: Chorley, R.J., Haggett, P. (eds.) Socio-economic Models in Geography, Taylor & Francis, Abington (1967)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zipf, G.: Human Behaviour and the Principle of Least Effort. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1949)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lösch, A.: The Economics of Location. Yale University Press, London (1954)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Christaller, W.: Die Zentralen Orte in Südeutchland, Jena (1933)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ingram, D.R.: The Concept of Accessibility: A Search for an operational Form. Regional Studies 5, 101–107 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Love, D., Lindquist, P.: The geographical Accessibility of Hospitals to the Aged: A Geographic Information Systems Analysis within Illinois. Health Service Research 29, 629–651Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rietveld, P.: The Accessibility of railway Stations: The Role of the Bicycle in the Netherlands. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 5, 71–75Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Linneker, B.J., Spence, N.A.: Accessibility measures compared in an analysis of the impact of the M25 London Orbital Motorway in Britain. Environment and Planning A 24, 1137–1154 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Guy, C.M.: The Assessment of Access to Local Shopping Opportunities: A Comparison of Accessibility Measures. Environment and Planning B 10, 219–238 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sten Hansen, H.: Analysing the Role of Accessibility in Contemporary Urban Development. In: Gervasi, O., Taniar, D., Murgante, B., Laganà, A., Mun, Y., Gavrilova, M.L. (eds.) ICCSA 2009. LNCS, vol. 5592, pp. 385–396. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shen, Q.: Location characteristics of inner city neighbourhoods and employment accessibility of low-wage workers. Environment and Planning B 25, 345–365 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Geurs, K.T., Ritsema van Eck, J.R.: Accessibility measures: review and applications. Urban Research Centre, Utrecht University (2001)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Geurs, K.T., Van Wee, B.: Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: Review and research directions. Journal of Transport Geography 12, 127–140 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Liu, S., Zhu, X.: Accessibility Analyst: an integrated GIS tool for accessibility analysis in urban transportation planning. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 31, 105–124 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Liu, S., Zhu, X.: An Integrated GIS Approach to Accessibility Analysis. Transactions in GIS 8, 45–62 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yang, D.-H., Goerge, R., Mullner, R.: Comparing GIS-Based Methods of Measuring Spatial Accessibility to Health Services. Journal of Medical Systems 30(1), 23–32 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Comber, A., Brunson, C., Green, E.: Using a GIS-based network analysis to determine urban greenspace accessibility for different ethnic and religious groups. Landscape and Urban Planning 86(1), 103–114 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Iacono, M., Krizek, K., El-Geneidy, A.: Measuring non-motorized accessibility: issues, alternatives, and execution. Journal of Transport Geography 18(1), 133–140 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lotfi, S., Koohsari, M.J.: Measuring objective accessibility to neighborhood facilities in the city (A case study: Zone 6 in Tehran, Iran). Cities 26(3), 133–140 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Matisziw, T.C., Grubesic, T.H.: Evaluating locational accessibility to the US air transportation system. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 44(9), 710–722 (2010)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Chen, A., Yang, C., Kongsomsaksakul, S., Lee, M.: Network-based Accessibility Measures for Vulnerability Analysis of Degradable Transportation Networks. Networks and Spatial Economics 7(3), 241–256 (2007)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hudecek, T.: Model of time accessibility by individual car transportation. Geografie 113, 140–153 (2008)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lovett, A., Haynes, R., Sünnenberg, G., Gale, S.: Car travel time and accessibility by bus to general practitioner services: a study using patient registers and GIS. Social Science & Medicine 55, 97–111 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Nettleton, M., Pass, D.J., Walters, G.W., White, R.C.: Public Transport Accessibility Map of access to General Practitioners Surgeries in Longbridge, Birmingham, UK, pp. 64–75. Journal of Maps (2006)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Winther, M.: Analyse af emissioner fra vejtrafikken: Sammenligning af emissionsfaktorer og beregningsmetoder i forskellige modeller, Faglig rapport fra DMU, no. Danmarks Miljøundersøgelser, Aarhus Universitet (1999)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Coffey, W.J., Shearmur, R.G.: The identification of employment centers in Canadian metropolitan areas: the example of Montreal. Canadian Geographer 45, 371–386 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Morten Fuglsang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Henning Sten Hansen
    • 1
  • Bernd Münier
    • 2
  1. 1.Aalborg University CopenhagenBallerupDenmark
  2. 2.National Environmental Research InstituteAarhus UniversityFrederiksborgvejDenmark

Personalised recommendations