Skip to main content

Consistency and Optimality

  • Conference paper
Models of Computation in Context (CiE 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 6735))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 488 Accesses

Abstract

Assume that the problem Q 0 is not solvable in polynomial time. For theories T containing a sufficiently rich part of true arithmetic we characterize T ∪ {Con T } as the minimal extension of T proving for some algorithm that it decides Q 0 as fast as any algorithm \(\mathbb B\) with the property that T proves that \(\mathbb B\) decides Q 0. Here, Con T claims the consistency of T. Moreover, we characterize problems with an optimal algorithm in terms of arithmetical theories.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cook, S.A., Nguyen, P.: Logical Foundations of Proof Complexity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Hartmanis, J.: Relations between diagonalization, proof systems, and complexity gaps. Theoretical Computer Science 8, 239–253 (1979)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Hutter, M.: The fastest and shortest algorithm for all well-defined problems. International Journal of Foundations of Computer Science 13, 431–443 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Krajicèk, J., Pudlák, P.: Propositional proof systems, the consistency of first order theories and the complexity of computations. The Journal of Symbolic Logic 54, 1063–1079 (1989)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Levin, L.: Universal search problems (in Russian). Problemy Peredachi Informatsii 9, 115–116 (1973)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Messner, J.: On optimal algorithms and optimal proof systems. In: Meinel, C., Tison, S. (eds.) STACS 1999. LNCS, vol. 1563, pp. 361–372. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Sadowski, Z.: On an optimal propositional proof system and the structure of easy subsets. Theoretical Computer Science 288, 181–193 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Chen, Y., Flum, J., Müller, M. (2011). Consistency and Optimality. In: Löwe, B., Normann, D., Soskov, I., Soskova, A. (eds) Models of Computation in Context. CiE 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6735. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21875-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21875-0_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-21874-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-21875-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics