Skip to main content

Using Contextual Factors Analysis to Explain Transfer of Least Common Multiple Skills

  • Conference paper
Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6738))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Transfer of learning to new or different contexts has always been a chief concern of education because unlike training for a specific job, education must establish skills without knowing exactly how those skills might be called upon. Research on transfer can be difficult, because it is often superficially unclear why transfer occurs or, more frequently, does not, in a particular paradigm. While initial results with Learning Factors Transfer (LiFT) analysis (a search procedure using Performance Factors Analysis, PFA) show that more predictive models can be built by paying attention to these transfer factors [1, 2], like proceeding models such as AFM (Additive Factors Model) [3], these models rely on a Q-matrix analysis that treats skills as discrete units at transfer. Because of this discrete treatment, the models are more parsimonious, but may lose resolution on aspects of component transfer. To improve understanding of this transfer, we develop new logistic regression model variants that predict learning differences as a function of the context of learning. One advantage of these models is that they allow us to disentangle learning of transferable knowledge from the actual transfer performance episodes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Pavlik Jr., P.I., Cen, H., Koedinger, K.R.: Performance Factors Analysis – a New Alternative to Knowledge Tracing. In: Dimitrova, V., Mizoguchi, R. (eds.) Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, Brighton, England (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pavlik Jr., P.I., Cen, H., Koedinger, K.R.: Learning Factors Transfer Analysis: Using Learning Curve Analysis to Automatically Generate Domain Models. In: Barnes, T., Desmarais, M., Romero, C., Ventura, S. (eds.) Proceedings of the the 2nd International Conference on Educational Data Mining, Cordoba, Spain, pp. 121–130 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cen, H., Koedinger, K.R., Junker, B.: Learning Factors Analysis – A General Method for Cognitive Model Evaluation and Improvement. In: Ikeda, M., Ashley, K.D., Chan, T.-W. (eds.) ITS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4053, pp. 164–175. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Thorndike, E.L., Woodworth, R.S.: The Influence of Improvement in One Mental Function Upon the Efficiency of Other Functions (I). Psychological Review 8, 247–261 (1901)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Judd, C.H.: Special Training and General Intelligence. Education Review 36, 28–42 (1908)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wertheimer, M.: Productive Thinking (1945)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Koedinger, K., McLaren, B.: Developing a Pedagogical Domain Theory of Early Algebra Problem Solving. CMU-HCII Tech. Report 02-100 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kieras, D.E., Meyer, D.E.: The Role of Cognitive Task Analysis in the Application of Predictive Models of Human Performance. In: Schraagen, J.M., Chipman, S.F., Shalin, V.L. (eds.) Cognitive Task Analysis. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Mahwah (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Barnes, T., Stamper, J., Madhyastha, T.: Comparative Analysis of Concept Derivation Using the Q-Matrix Method and Facets (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Barnes, T.: The Q-Matrix Method: Mining Student Response Data for Knowledge. In: American Association for Artificial Intelligence 2005 Educational Data Mining Workshop (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Simon, H.A.: The Functional Equivalence of Problem Solving Skills. Cognitive Psychology 7, 268–288 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pardos, Z., Heffernan, N.: Detecting the Learning Value of Items in a Randomized Problem Set. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education. IOS Press, Brighton (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pardos, Z., Heffernan, N.: Determining the Significance of Item Order in Randomized Problem Sets. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Educational Data Mining, Cordoba, Spain, pp. 111–120 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Morris, C.D., Bransford, J.D., Franks, J.J.: Levels of Processing Versus Transfer Appropriate Processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 16, 519–533 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pennington, N., Nicolich, R., Rahm, J.: Transfer of Training between Cognitive Subskills: Is Knowledge Use Specific? Cognitive Psychology 28, 175–224 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Pavlik, P.I., Yudelson, M., Koedinger, K.R. (2011). Using Contextual Factors Analysis to Explain Transfer of Least Common Multiple Skills. In: Biswas, G., Bull, S., Kay, J., Mitrovic, A. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6738. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21869-9_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21869-9_34

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-21868-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-21869-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics