Advertisement

Shape Descriptor Based on the Volume of Transformed Image Boundary

  • Xavier Descombes
  • Sergey Komech
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6744)

Abstract

In this paper, we derive new shape descriptors based on a directional characterization. The main idea is to study the behavior of the shape neighborhood under family of transformations. We obtain a description invariant with respect to rotation, reflection, translation and scaling. We consider family of volume-preserving transformations. Our descriptor is based on the volume of the neighbourhood of transformed image. A well-defined metric is then proposed on the associated feature space. We show the continuity of this metric. Some results on shape retrieval are provided on Kimia 216 and part of MPEG-7 CE-Shape-1 databases to show the accuracy of the proposed shape metric.

Keywords

Image Retrieval Shape Descriptor Shape Space Shape Retrieval Procrustes Distance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Dryden, I.L., Mardia, K.V.: Statistical shape analysis. Wiley, New York (1998)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Serra, J.: Image Analysis and Mathematical Morphology. Academic Press, New York (1982)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kendall, D.G.: Shape Manifolds, Procrustean Metrics, and Complex Projective Spaces. Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society 16, 81–121 (1984)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Loncaric, S.: A survey of shape analysis techniques, J. Pattern Recognition 31(8), 983–1001 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhang, D., Lu, G.: Reveiw of shape representation and description techniques. J. Pattern Recognition 37, 1–19 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yong, I., Walker, J., Bowie, J.: An anlysis technique for biological shape. J. Comput. Graphics Image Process 25, 357–370 (1974)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Peura, M., Livirinen, J.: Efficiency of simple shape descriptors. In: Third International Workshop on Visual Form, Capri, Italy, May 1997, pp. 443–451 (1997)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rucklidge, W.J.: Efficient locating objects using Hausdorff distance. Int. J. Comput. Vision 24(3), 251–270 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Belongie, S., Malik, J., Puzicha, J.: Matching shapes. In: IEEE Eighth Int. Conf. on Comput. Vision, Vancouver, Canada, July 2001, vol. I, pp. 454–461 (2001)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bai, X., Latecki, L.J.: Path Similarity Skeleton Graph Matching. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 30(7), 1282–1292 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sebastian, T., Klein, P., Kimia, B.: Recognition of shapes by editing their shock graphs. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and machine intelligence 25(5), 116–125 (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xavier Descombes
    • 1
  • Sergey Komech
    • 2
  1. 1.EPI Ariana, INRIA SAMSophia AntipolisFrance
  2. 2.Dobrushin Lab.IITPMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations