Abstract
In this chapter, I develop theoretical foundations for practice-based innovation from the embodied cognition school of thought in cognitive science and from the pragmatist line of thought in philosophy. From it, I derive the notion of cognitive distance. I use the resulting insights to discuss the well-known notions of absorptive capacity and exploitation and exploration from the innovation literature, and the way in which exploitation and exploration are connected. In the analysis I model practice in terms of the notion of a script. Cognitive difference (‘distance’) complicates but also enriches collaboration, and this positive effect is related to the notion of bridging structural holes. Among other things, the analysis yields an underpinning of the idea that application is not just a result of research but also a basis for ideas for research, in two-way traffic between theory and practice, and between research and application. The analysis also has implications for innovation policy, in particular for the currently popular principle of focus and mass.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bazerman, M. H. (1998). Judgement in managerial decision making. New York: Wiley.
Burt, R. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. In N. Nohria & R. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations: Structure, form and action (pp. 57–91). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Damasio, A. R. (1995). Descartes error: Emotion, reason and the human brain. London: Picador.
Damasio, A. R. (2003). Looking for Spinoza. Orlando: Harcourt.
Edelman, G. M. (1987). Neural Darwinism: The theory of neuronal group selection. New York: Basic Books.
Edelman, G. M. (1992). Bright air, brilliant fire: On the matter of mind. London: Penguin.
Joas, H. (1996). Die Kreativität des Handelns. Suhrkamp: Frankfurt a.M.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh. New York: Basic Books.
March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 101–123.
Nooteboom, B. (2000). Learning and innovation in organizations and economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nooteboom, B. (2004). Governance and competence, how can they be combined? Cambridge Journal of Economics, 28(4), 505–526.
Nooteboom, B. (2009). A cognitive theory of the firm. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Nooteboom, B., & Stam, E. (Eds.). (2008). Micro-foundations for innovation policy. Amsterdam: Chicago University Press.
Nooteboom, B., Van Haverbeke, W. P. M., Duijsters, G. M., Gilsing, V. A., & V. d. Oord, A. (2007). Optimal cognitive distance and absorptive capacity. Research Policy, 36, 1016–1034.
Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nooteboom, B. (2012). A Pragmatist Theory of Innovation. In: Melkas, H., Harmaakorpi, V. (eds) Practice-Based Innovation: Insights, Applications and Policy Implications. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21723-4_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21723-4_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-21722-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-21723-4
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)