Machinery Design for Construction Safety in Practice

  • Beata Mrugalska
  • Aleksandra Kawecka-Endler
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6767)


Increasingly today more and more complex machinery are designed, produced or maintained. It causes that the requirements of machines operators in the scope of assurance protection are progressively higher. As a result new laws, standards and practices are introduced. These regulations concern all the machines which are placed into the EU market. In this paper the practical verification of construction design for safety is done on the example of shaping machines such as: loathes, milling machines, drilling machines and horizontal boring machines with the application of existing law. The investigated machines were offered for sale on Polish market by Internet.


machinery design safety design Machinery Directives harmonized norms regulations 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Andres, R.N.: Risk Assessment & Reduction: A Look at the Impact of ANSI B11.TR3. Professional Safety, 20–26 (January 2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Behm, M.: Linking Construction Fatalities to the Design for Construction Safety Concept. Safety Science 43(8), 589–611 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beohm, R.T.: Designing Safety into Machines. Professional Safety 43(9), 20–24 (1998)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Christensen, W.C.: Safety through Design. Helping Design Engineers Answer 10 Key Questions. Professional Safety, 32–39 (March 2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Falzon, P.: Enabling Safety: Issues in Design and Continuous Design. Cogn. Tech. Work 10, 7–14 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gambatese, J.A.: Safety in a Designer’s Hands. Civil Engineering, ASCE 70(6), 56–59 (2000)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    ISTD. Institute for Safety Through Design Website. National Safety Council, Itasca, IL (2003),
  8. 8.
    Kawecka-Endler, A.: Innovative Aspects in Design and Manufacturing of Products. In: Smith, M.J., Salvendy, G. (eds.) Systems, Social and Internalization Design Aspects of Human-Computer-Interaction, vol. 2, pp. 192–196. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, Mahwah (2001)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Korman, R.: Wanted: New Ideas. Panel Ponders Ways to End Accidents and Health Hazards. Engineering News-Record, 26–29 (December 31, 2001)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Manuele, F.A.: On the Practice of Safety. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York (1997)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mechanical Engineering. Directive 2006/42/EC on Machinery,
  12. 12.
    Mrugalska, B.: Methodology of Machines Design Robust to Disturbances in Manufacturing and Exploitation Processes, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Poznań University of Technology, Poznań (2008) (in Polish) Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mrugalska, B., Kawecka-Endler, A.: Practical Application of Ergonomic Design Rules in Machinery Building. In: Tytyk, E. (ed.) Ergonomic Engineering, pp. 7–22. Publishing House of Poznań University of Technology, Poznań (2011) (in Polish)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mrugalska, B., Kawecka-Endler, A.: Practical Application of Products Design Method Robust to Disturbances. Journal of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries (early view – DOI: 10.1002/hfm.20200)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ridley, J., Pearce, D.: Safety with Machinery. Elsevier, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford (2002)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ridley, J., Pearce, D.: Safety with Machinery, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford (2006)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Safe Machinery Handbook. Schneider Electric Ltd. (February 2010),
  18. 18.
    Singh, G.K., Kazzaz, A.S.: Induction Machine Drive Condition Monitoring and Diagnostic Research - a Survey. Electric Power Systems Research 64(2), 145–158 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Smallwood, J.J.: The Influence of Designers on Occupational Safety and Health. In: Proceedings of the First International Conference of CIB Working Commission W99, Implementation of Safety and Health on Construction Sites, Lisbon, Portugal, September 4-7, pp. 203–213 (1996)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Szymberski, R.: Construction project safety planning. Tappi Journal 80(11), 69–74 (1997)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Weinstein, M., Gambatese, J., Hecker, S.: Can Design Improve Construction Safety?: Assessing the Impact of a Collaborative Safety-in-Design Process. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 131(10), 1125–1134 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Beata Mrugalska
    • 1
  • Aleksandra Kawecka-Endler
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Engineering ManagementPoznan University of TechnologyPoznanPoland

Personalised recommendations