Monitoring User Distraction in a Car by Segmentation of Experimental Data

  • Tomáš Macek
  • Martin Labský
  • Jan Kleindienst
  • Hana Trusková
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6767)


We present in this paper results of research conducted on evaluation of speech user interfaces in cars. The approach is based on segmentation of the driver’s attention data based on user activity and attention. The methodology applied is based on the proposed standard of Lane Change Test (ISO proposal #26022) which is extended by splitting the data based on operation performed. We summarize first results obtained while larger scale study is ongoing.


UI Elements cognitive load driving distraction 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Mattes, S.: The lane change task as a tool for driver distraction evaluation. In: Strasser, H., Rausch, H., Bubb, H. (eds.) Quality of Work and Products in Enterprises of the Future, Ergonomia Verlag, Stuttgart (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Harbluk, L., Mitroi, S., Burns, C.: Three Navigation Systems with Three Tasks: Using the Lane-change test to Assess Distraction Demand. In: Proc. 5th Intl. Driving Symp. on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barón, A., Green, P.: Safety and Usability of Speech Interfaces for In-Vehicle Tasks while Driving: A Brief Literature Review. Technical Report UMTRI-2006-5. University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Stutts, J., et al.: Distractions in Everyday Driving, University of North Karolina at Chapel Hill, Highway Safety Research Center, study for AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lamble, D., Kauranen, T., Laakso, M., Summala, H.: Cognitive load and detection thresholds in car following situations: safety implications for using mobile (cellular) telephones while driving. Accident Analysis & Prevention 31(6), 617–623 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Atkinson, C., Shiffrin, M.: Chapter: Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In: Spence, K.W., Spence, J.T. (eds.) The Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Volume 2), pp. 89–91. Academic Press, New York (1968)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Baddeley, A.: The magical number seven: still magic after all these years? Psychology Review 101(2), 353–356 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Baddeley, A.: Working memory: looking back and looking forvard. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 4(10), 829–839 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Labský, M., Macek, T., Kleindienst, J., Quast, H., Couvreur, C.: In-car Dictation and Driver’s Distraction: a Case Study. In: Proc. HCII 2011, Orgando, Florida, USA (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wickens, D.: Processing resources in attention. In: Parasuraman, R., Davies, R. (eds.) Varieties of Attention, pp. 63–102. Academic Press, New York (1984)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tomáš Macek
    • 1
  • Martin Labský
    • 1
  • Jan Kleindienst
    • 1
  • Hana Trusková
    • 1
  1. 1.IBM Česká republikaPraha 4 – ChodovCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations