Advertisement

Design of Human Computer Interfaces for Highly Automated Vehicles in the EU-Project HAVEit

  • Frank Flemisch
  • Anna Schieben
  • Nadja Schoemig
  • Matthias Strauss
  • Stefan Lueke
  • Anna Heyden
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6767)

Abstract

As vehicle and computer technology are more and more merging, new forms of assistance and automation in vehicles open up the potential to increasing safety and improving comfort. In HAVEit, an EU-FP7 Integrating Project, car and truck manufacturers, suppliers and research organizations explore highly automated driving applications, where the automation can take over substantial parts of the driving task, but where the driver is still in the loop. The interaction between the human and such an automation becomes a crucial part for a successful, dynamic balance between human and machine. Starting with design explorations, generic interaction and display schemes for highly automated driving were derived, implemented, tested in assessments and experiments, and finally applied to the demonstrator vehicles of HAVEit.

Keywords

Human machine interaction human computer interaction automation assistance systems interaction schemes pattern display design 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Darms, M., Komar, M., Lueke, S.: Map based Road Boundary Estimation. In: IEEE Symposium on Intelligent Vehicles. IEEE Press, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Flemisch, F., Schieben, A., Temme, G., Rauch, N., Heesen, M.: HAVEit D. 33.2: Preliminary concept on optimum task repartition for HAVEit systems. Confidential deliverable to the EU Commission, Brussels (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Flemisch, F., Schieben, A. (eds.): HAVEit D. 33.3: Validation of preliminary design of HAVEit systems by simulation. Public deliverable, Brussels (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Flemisch, F., Kelsch, J., Löper, C., Schieben, A., Schindler, J.: Automation spectrum, inner/outer compatibility and other potentially useful human factors concepts for assistance and automation. In: de Waard, D., et al. (eds.) Human Factors for Assistance and Automation. Shaker Publishing, Maastricht (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Flemisch, F.O., Adams, C.A., Conway, S.R., Goodrich, K.H., Palmer, M.T., Schutte, P.C.: The H-Metaphor as a Guideline for Vehicle Automation and Interaction. Technical report No. NASA/TM—2003-212672. NASA, Langley Research Center, Hampton (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Flemisch, F.O., Goodrich, K.H., Conway, S.R.: At the crossroads of manually controlled and automated transport: The H-Metaphor and its first applications (progress update 2005). In: Proceedings of the 5th European Congress on ITS, Hannover (2005)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hoeger, R., Amditis, A., Kunert, M., Hoess, A., Flemisch, F.O., Krueger, H.-P., et al.: Highly Automated Vehicles for Intelligent Transport: HAVEit Approach. In: Proceedings of the 15th ITS World Congress, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hollnagel, E.: Modeling human-system interaction: From input-output to coping with complexity. In: Proc. 7. Berliner Werkstatt Mensch-Maschine-Systeme, Berlin (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Holzmann, F., Flemisch, F., Siegwart, R., Bubb, H.: From Aviation down to Vehicles – Integration of a Motions-Envelope as Safety Technology. In: Proceedings of the SAE 2006 Automotive Dynamics Stability and Controls Conference, Novi (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kienle, M., Damböck, D., Kelsch, J., Flemisch, F., Bengler, K.: Towards an H-Mode for highly automated vehicles: Driving with side sticks. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces, Essen (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    McLuhan, M.: Understanding Media. MIT Press, Massachusetts (1964)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Meister, D.: Systems Design, Development, and Testing. In: Salvendy, G. (ed.) Handbook of Human Factors. Wiley, New York (1987)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Merat, N., Jamson, A.H.: Is drivers’ situation awareness influenced by a fully automated driving scenario? In: de Waard, D., Godthelp, J., Kooi, F.L., Brookhuis, K.A. (eds.) Human Factors, Security and Safety. Shaker Publishing, Maastricht (2009)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Moholy-Nagy, L.: Vision in Motion (1928)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Norman, D.A., Draper, S.: User centered system design: New perspectives on human-computer interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (1986)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Petermann, I.: Evaluation of two different transition designs for Temporary Autopilot. In: Schieben, A., Flemisch F. (eds.) HAVEit D. 33.6: Validation of Concept on Optimum Task Repartition. Confidential deliverable to the EU Commission, Brussels (2011)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Petermann, I., Schlag, B.: Auswirkungen der Synthese von Assistenz und Automation auf das Fahrer-Fahrzeug-System. In: Proceedings of the AAET 2010 –Braunschweig (2010)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rauch, N., Kaussner, A., Krüger, H.-P., Boverie, S., Flemisch, F.: Measures and Countermeasures for impaired driver’s state within highly automated driving. In: Proceedings of the Transport Research Arena Europe 2010 (TRA 2010), Brussels (2010)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schieben, A., Heesen, M., Schindler, J., Kelsch, J., Flemisch, F.: The theater-system technique: Agile designing and testing of system behavior and interaction, applied to highly automated vehicles. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Essen (2009)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schieben, A., Flemisch, F. (eds.): HAVEit D. 33.6: Validation of concept on optimum task repartition. Confidential deliverable to the EU Commission, Brussels (2011)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schmidt, G., Kiss, M., Babbel, E., Galla, A.: The Wizard on Wheels: Rapid Prototyping and User Testing of Future Driver Assistance Using Wizard of Oz Technique in a Vehicle. In: Proceedings of the FISITA 2008 World Automotive Congress, Munich (2008)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schindler, J., Temme, G., Schieben, A., Flemisch, F.: Exploratory Design of a Highly Automated System for Entering the Expressway. In: de Waard, D., et al. (eds.) Human Factors, Security and Safety, Shaker Publishing, Maastricht (2009)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Schömig, N., Kaussner, A. (a): Evaluation of an Attention Monitor for drowsy driving. In: Schieben, A., Flemisch, F. (eds.) HAVEit D. 33.6: Validation of Concept on Optimum Task Repartition. Confidential deliverable to the EU Commission, Brussels (2011)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Schömig, N., Kaussner, A (b).: Evaluation of an Attention Monitor for distracted driving. In: Schieben, A., Flemisch, F. (eds.) HAVEit D. 33.6: Validation of Concept on Optimum Task Repartition. Confidential deliverable to the EU Commission, Brussels (2011)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Winner, H., Hakuli, S.: Conduct-by-Wire – Following a New Paradigm for Driving into the Future. In: Proceedings of FISITA World Automotive Congress, Yokohama (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frank Flemisch
    • 1
  • Anna Schieben
    • 1
  • Nadja Schoemig
    • 2
  • Matthias Strauss
    • 3
  • Stefan Lueke
    • 3
  • Anna Heyden
    • 4
  1. 1.German Aerospace Center (DLR)Institute of Transportation SystemsBraunschweigGermany
  2. 2.WIVW WürzburgGermany
  3. 3.Continental FrankfurtGermany
  4. 4.VTEC Volvo TechnologyGothenburgSweden

Personalised recommendations