Skip to main content

From Flow-Global Choreography to Component Types

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 6598))

Abstract

The need for global behavior definitions is well established both in the domain of embedded reactive systems and service-oriented (business) systems. The problem has been to define the global behavior with sufficient, rigor and completeness to fully cover the intended behavior and not just some scenarios, and to enable automatic synthesis of component behaviors in practical systems and service development. In this paper we build on previous work where UML collaborations are used to structure systems and services into reusable building blocks, and UML activities to model global behavior, called choreography in the following. We identify two forms of choreography: one where all flows are localized to the roles participating in collaborations and another where the flows are not localized and thus more abstract. We propose a novel approach to map the flow-global choreography to a flow-localized choreography and further to distributed component behaviors (orchestrations) with well-defined interfaces from which implementation code can be generated using existing techniques. The overall approach combines the merits of global choreographies and collaborative building blocks with the flexibility of component-oriented designs. The approach is illustrated using a city guiding system as case study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Erl, T.: SOA: Principles of Service Design. Prentice Hall Press, Englewood Cliffs (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kraemer, F.A., Slåtten, V., Herrmann, P.: Tool Support for the Rapid Composition, Analysis and Implementation of Reactive Services. Journal of Systems and Software 82, 2068–2080 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kathayat, S.B., Bræk, R.: Platform Support for Situated Collaborative Learning. In: International Conference on Mobile, Hybrid, and Online Learning, pp. 53–60. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kraemer, F.A., Kathayat, S.B., Bræk, R.: Unified Modeling of Service Logic with User Interfaces. In: Proceeding of the First International Workshop on Model Driven Service Engineering and Data Quality and Security, pp. 37–44. ACM, New York (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Castejón, H.N., Bræk, R., Bochmann, G.V.: Realizability of Collaboration-Based Service Specifications. In: Proceedings of the 14th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference, pp. 73–80. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kraemer, F.A.: Engineering Reactive Systems: A Compositional and Model-Driven Method Based on Collaborative Building Blocks. PhD Thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kathayat, S.B., Bræk, R., Le, H.N.: Automatic Derivation of Components from Choreographies - A Case Study. In: International Conference on Software Engineering, Phuket, Thailand (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Decker, G.: Realizability of Interaction Models. In: 1st Central-European Workshop on Services and their Composition, CEUR-WS.org, pp. 55–60 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. OMG, Unified Modeling Language 2.1.1 Specification (Superstructure 07-02-05), http://www.omg.org

  10. Whittle, J.: Extending Interaction Overview Diagrams with Activity Diagram Constructs. Software and Systems Modeling 9, 203–224 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rößler, F., Geppert, B., Gotzhein, R.: CoSDL - An Experimental Language for Collaboration Specification. In: Sherratt, E. (ed.) SAM 2002. LNCS, vol. 2599, pp. 1–20. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. International Telecommunication Union: Recommendation Z.100, Specification and Description Language (SDL) (November 2007), http://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-Z.100/en

  13. Castejón, H.N.: Synthesizing State-Machine Behaviour from UML Collaborations and Use Case Maps. In: Prinz, A., Reed, R., Reed, J. (eds.) SDL 2005. LNCS, vol. 3530, pp. 339–359. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Buhr, R.J.A.: Use Case Maps as Architectural Entities for Complex Systems. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 24, 1131–1155 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kazhamiakin, R., Pistore, M.: Choreography Conformance Analysis: Asynchronous Communications and Information Alignment. In: Bravetti, M., Núñez, M., Tennenholtz, M. (eds.) WS-FM 2006. LNCS, vol. 4184, pp. 227–241. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Busi, N., Gorrieri, R., Guidi, C., Lucchi, R., Zavattaro, G.: Choreography and Orchestration Conformance for System Design. In: Ciancarini, P., Wiklicky, H. (eds.) COORDINATION 2006. LNCS, vol. 4038, pp. 63–81. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Qiu, Z., Zhao, X., Cai, C., Yang, H.: Towards the Theoretical Foundation of Choreography. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 973–982. ACM, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Salaün, G., Bultan, T.: Realizability of Choreographies Using Process Algebra Encodings. In: Leuschel, M., Wehrheim, H. (eds.) IFM 2009. LNCS, vol. 5423, pp. 167–182. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Mendling, J., Hafner, M.: From Inter-organizational Workflows to Process Execution: Generating BPEL from WS-CDL. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z., Herrero, P. (eds.) OTM-WS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3762, pp. 506–515. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Barros, A., Dumas, M., Oaks, P.: A Critical Overview of Web Service Choreography Description Language (WS-CDL). In: BPTrends (March 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wieczorek, S., Roth, A., Stefanescu, A., Kozyura, V., Charfi, A., Kraft, F.M., Schieferdecker, I.: Viewpoints for Modeling Choreographies in Service-Oriented Architectures. In: WICSA/ECSA, pp. 11–20. IEEE Press, Los Alamitos (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bræk, R., Floch, J.: ICT convergence: Modeling issues. In: Amyot, D., Williams, A.W. (eds.) SAM 2004. LNCS, vol. 3319, pp. 237–256. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Milner, R.: Communication and Concurrency. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs (1989)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Castejón, H.N.: Collaborations in Service Engineering: Modeling, Analysis and Execution. PhD thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kathayat, S.B., Bræk, R. (2011). From Flow-Global Choreography to Component Types. In: Kraemer, F.A., Herrmann, P. (eds) System Analysis and Modeling: About Models. SAM 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6598. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21652-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21652-7_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-21651-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-21652-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics