Abstract
Three different usability studies present evaluation methods for cross-domain human-computer-interaction. The first study compares different input devices like touch screen, turn-push-controller or handwriting recognition under regard of human error probability, input speed and subjective usability assessment. The other experiments had a focus on typical automotive issues: interruptibility and the influence of oscillations of the cockpit on the interaction.
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kavakli, M., Thorne, J.R.: A Usability Study of Input Devices on Measuring User Performance in Computer Games. School of Information Technology, Charles Sturt University, Bathurst (2002)
Murata, A., Iwase, H.: Usability of Touch-Panel Interfaces for Older Adults. Human Factors 47(4), 767–776 (2005)
Armbrüster, C., Sutter, C., Ziefle, M.: Notebook input devices put to the age test: the usability of track point and touchpad for middle-aged adults. Ergonomics 50(3), 426–445 (2007)
Rogers, W.A., Fisk, A.D., McLaughlin, A.C., Pak, R.: Touch a Screen or Turn a Knob: Choosing the Best Device for the Job. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 47(2), 271–288 (2005)
Brooke, J.: SUS - A quick and dirty usability scale. In: Jordan, P.W., Thomas, B., Weerdemeester, B.A., McClelland, I.L. (eds.) Usability evaluation in industry, Taylor & Francis, London (1996)
Hassenzahl, M., Burmester, M., Koller, F.: AttrakDiff: Ein Fragebogen zur Messung wahrgenommener hedonischer und pragmatischer Qualität. In: Szwillus, G., Ziegler, J. (eds.) Mensch & Computer 2003: Interaktion in Bewegung, 7. bis 10, September 2003, Teubner, Stuttgart (2003)
ISO, 16673. Road vehicles - Ergonomic aspects of transport information and control systems - Occlusin method to assess visual distraction due to the use of in-vehicle systems (2007): ISO
ISO, 9241-11. Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs) - Part 11: Guidance on usability (1999): ISO
VDI/VDE, 3850. User-friendly design of useware for machines. Beuth Verlag, Berlin(2000)
Lin, C.J., Liu, C.N., Chao, C.J., Chen, H.J.: The performance of computer input devices in a vibration environment. Ergonomics 53(4), 478–490 (2010)
Yee, W.: Potential Limitations of Multi-touch Gesture Vocabulary: Differentiation, Adoption, Fatigue. In: Jacko, J.A. (ed.) Proceedings of 13th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. HCI International 2009, Part II, San Diego, CA, USA, July 19-24, 2009, pp. 291–300. Springer, New York (2009)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Haslbeck, A., Popova, S., Krause, M., Pecot, K., Mayer, J., Bengler, K. (2011). Experimental Evaluations of Touch Interaction Considering Automotive Requirements. In: Jacko, J.A. (eds) Human-Computer Interaction. Interaction Techniques and Environments. HCI 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6762. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21605-3_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21605-3_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-21604-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-21605-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)