Advertisement

Measuring Corrective Reaction Time with the Intermittent Illumination Model

  • Jui-Feng Lin
  • Colin G. Drury
  • Chin-Mei Chou
  • Yu-De Lin
  • Yi-Quan Lin
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6761)

Abstract

The main objective of this research was to develop a methodology based on Drury’s [1] intermittent illumination model to directly measure individuals’ corrective reaction times, without the two methodology-related issues of Lin & Drury [2]. Six highly-practiced participants performed self-paced circular tracking tasks by using a modified LED monitor in a darkened room. While performing movements, the monitor’s backlight was intermittently turned on and off to generate five values of expected delay of visual feedback. Expected delay and measured speed were used with the intermittent illumination model to calculate individuals’ corrective reaction times. The results of showed that the model fitted the data very well, accounts for at least 94.6 % of the variance. The mean corrective reaction time was 273 milliseconds and ranged from 170 to 460 milliseconds for individual participants. While previous studies only reported group means, this was the first study to report individuals’ corrective reaction times.

Keywords

corrective reaction time intermittent illumination model hand-control movement tracking movement 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Drury, C.G.: A model for movements under intermittent illumination. Ergonomics 37(7), 1245–1251 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lin, J.-F., Drury, C.: An application of the intermittent illumination model for measuring individual’s corrective reaction time. In: The 3rd International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, July 17-20. Taylor & Francis, Miami (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Welford, A.T.: The “psychological refractory period” and the timing of high-speed performance - a review and a theory. British Journal of Psychology 43, 2–19 (1952)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Woodworth, R.S.: The accuracy of voluntary movement. The Psychological Review Monographs Supplement 3(13), 1–114 (1899)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vince, M.A.: Corrective movements in a pursuit task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1, 85–103 (1948)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Keele, S.W., Posner, M.I.: Processing of visual feedback in rapid movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology 77(1), 155–158 (1968)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Beggs, W.D.A., Howarth, C.I.: Movement control in a repetitive motor task. Nature 225, 752–753 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tsao, Y.C., Drury, C.G.: Self-paced tracking under intermittent illumination. Unpublished paper, Department of Industrial Engineering, State University of New York at Buffalo (1975)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Drury, C.G.: Movements with lateral constraint. Ergonomics 14(2), 293–305 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Howarth, C.I., Beggs, W.D.A., Bowden, J.M.: The relationship between speed and accuracy of movement aimed at a target. Acta Psychologica 35, 207–218 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lin, J.-F., Drury, C., Karwan, M., Paquet, V.: A general model that accounts for Fitts’ law and Drury’s model. In: Proceedings of the 17th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association, Beijing, China, August 9-14 (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jui-Feng Lin
    • 1
  • Colin G. Drury
    • 2
  • Chin-Mei Chou
    • 1
  • Yu-De Lin
    • 1
  • Yi-Quan Lin
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Industrial Engineering & ManagementYuan Ze UniversityChung-LiTaiwan
  2. 2.Department of Industrial & Systems EngineeringState University of New York at Buffalo, BuffaloNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations