Advertisement

Investigating the Effects of Metacognition in Dynamic Control Tasks

  • Jung Hyup Kim
  • Ling Rothrock
  • Anand Tharanathan
  • Hari Thiruvengada
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6761)

Abstract

Metacogntion is a broadly studied concept in cognitive science, educational psychology and developmental psychology. Prior research on metacognition shows that successful learning is often based on specific metacognitive activities which have to be frequently monitored during learning [1]. An important limitation in prior studies is that most experimental tasks were designed within static environments. Only rarely have researchers investigated metacognition during dynamic decision making. Therefore, the purpose of this research is to investigate the significance of metacognition while training to execute dynamic control tasks. Findings from this study demonstrate that the experimental group which was provided more focused feedback had higher situation awareness accuracy, relative to the groups which received relatively less focused feedback or no feedback. In addition, results indicated that metacognitive behaviors which were measured using subjective ratings of Pre and Post Meta probes showed different patterns. Preliminary findings provides evidence that enhanced metacognition has a significant impact on actual situation awareness in dynamic control tasks. Detecting causes for these changes is the next step of the research.

Keywords

Metacognition Human Performance Human-in-the-loop-simulation Situation Awareness 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Azevedo, R.: Using hypermedia as a metacognitive tool for enhancing student learning? The role of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist 40, 199–209 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Flavell, J.: Metacognition and cognitive monitoring. American Psychologist 34, 906–911 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Siegler, R., Lin, X.: Self-explanations promote children’s learning. Metacognition, Strategy Use, and Instruction, 85 (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Afflerbach, P., Cho, B.: Determining and describing reading Strategies. Metacognition, Strategy Use, and Instruction, 201 (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jackson, N., Butterfield, E.: A conception of giftedness designed to promote research. Conceptions of Giftedness, 151–181 (1986)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Squire, L.: Mechanisms of memory. Science 232, 1612 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sussan, D., Son, L.: The training of metacognitive monitoring in children. Columbia Undergraduate Science Journal 2 (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Son, L.: Spacing One’s Study: Evidence for a Metacognitive Control Strategy* 1. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 30, 601–604 (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nelson, T., Narens, L.: Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory 26, 125–173 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Teong, S.: The effect of metacognitive training on mathematical word-problem solving. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 19, 46–55 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Veenman, M., et al.: Initial inductive learning in a complex computer simulated environment: the role of metacognitive skills and intellectual ability. Computers in Human Behavior 18, 327–341 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chi, M.: Knowledge structures and memory development (1978)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Endsley, M.: Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 37, 32–64 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Endsley, M.: A survey of situation awareness requirements in air-to-air combat fighters. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology 3, 157–168 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jung Hyup Kim
    • 1
  • Ling Rothrock
    • 1
  • Anand Tharanathan
    • 2
  • Hari Thiruvengada
    • 2
  1. 1.Industrial and Manufacturing EngineeringPennsylvania State UniversityUSA
  2. 2.Honeywell LabsUSA

Personalised recommendations