Advertisement

A Design Science Framework for Designing and Assessing User Experience

  • Sisira Adikari
  • Craig McDonald
  • John Campbell
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6761)

Abstract

User Experience is a well recognized factor in design and evaluation of artifacts in Human-Computer Interaction. There are many user experience models reported in the literature to reflect this status. Techniques and instruments for managing user experience are still not sufficient. In this paper, we discuss design science research and important user experience models reported in the literature and propose an integrated design science framework for designing and assessing user experience. We also present the results of an experimental study to validate our proposed framework and the instrument employed.

Keywords

Design Science User Experience 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Jordan, P.: The Grid: Designing Pleasurable Products: An Introduction to New Human Factors. Taylor & Francis, Abington (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Blythe, M., Overbeeke, K., Monk, A., Wright, P.: Funology: from usability to enjoyment. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tractinsky, N., Katz, A.S., Ikar, D.: What is beautiful is usable. Interacting with Computers 13, 127–145 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hassenzahl, M.: The interplay of beauty, goodness, and usability in interactive products. Human-Computer Interaction 19, 319–349 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Norman, D.: The invisible computer: Why good products can fail, the personal computer is so complex, and information appliances are the answer. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jokela, T.: When good things happen to bad products: where are the benefits of usability in the consumer appliance market? Interactions 11, 28–35 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kuniavsky, M.: Smart Things: Ubiquitous Computing User Experience Design. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Law, E., Roto, V., Vermeeren, A., Kort, J., Hassenzahl, M.: Towards a shared definition of user experience. In: CHI, pp. 2395–2398 (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Law, E., Roto, V., Hassenzahl, M., Vermeeren, A., Kort, J.: Understanding, scoping and defining user experience: a survey approach. In: CHI, Boston, pp. 719–728 (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Forlizzi, J., Battarbee, K.: Understanding experience in interactive systems. In: DIS 2004, Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques, pp. 261–268 (2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hassenzahl, M., Tractinsky, N.: User experience-a research agenda. Behaviour and Information Technology 25, 91–97 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    ISO FDIS 9241-210: Human-centred design process for interactive systems. ISO (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    McCarthy, J., Wright, P.: Technology as experience. Interactions 11, 42–43 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Iivari, J.: A paradigmatic analysis of information systems as a design science. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 19, 39–63 (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Baskerville, R.: What design science is not. European Journal of Information Systems 17, 441–443 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hevner, A., Chatterjee, S.: Design science research in information systems - Theory and Practice. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hevner, A.: The Three Cycle View of Design Science Research. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 19, 87–92 (2007)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly 28, 75–105 (2004)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Blythe, M.A., Wright, P.C.: Pastiche scenarios: Fiction as a resource for user centred design. Interacting with Computers 18, 1139–1164 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Preece, J., Rogers, Y., Sharp, H.: Interaction design: beyond human-computer interaction. Wiley, Chichester (2002)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sharp, H., Rogers, Y., Preece, J.: Interaction design: beyond human-computer interaction. Wiley, Chichester (2007)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hassenzahl, M.: User experience (UX): towards an experiential perspective on product quality. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference of the Association Francophone d’Interaction Homme-Machine, pp. 11–15 (2008)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bevan, N.: Classifying and selecting UX and usability measures. In: International Workshop on Meaningful Measures: Valid Useful User Experience Measurement, pp. 13–18 (2008)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Petrie, H., Bevan, N.: The evaluation of accessibility, usability and user experience. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) The Universal Access Handbook, pp. 20.1–20.14. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2009)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nielsen, N.: The usability engineering. Academic Press, San Diego (1993)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Shneiderman, B.: Designing the user interface: strategies for effective human-computer interaction. Addison Wesley Longman, Boston (1998)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dix, A., Finlay, J., Abowd, G.D.: Human-computer interaction. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River (2004)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lindgaard, G., Dudek, C.: What is this evasive beast we call user satisfaction. Interacting with Computers 15, 429–452 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Adikari, S., McDonald, C., Lynch, N.: Design science-oriented usability modelling for software requirements. In: 12th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Interaction Design and Usability, pp. 373–382 (2007)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lindgaard, L.: Aesthetics, visual appeal, usability, and user satisfaction: What do the user’s eyes tell the user’s brain 5, 429–452 (2007)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lavie, T., Tractinsky, N.: Assessing dimensions of perceived visual aesthetics of web sites. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 60, 269–298 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ketola, P., Roto, V.: Exploring user experience measurement needs. In: 5th COST294-MAUSE Open Workshop on Valid Useful User Experience Measurement, VUUM (2008)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Tullis, T., Albert, W.: Measuring The User Experience: collecting, analyzing, and presenting usability metrics. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2008)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Naumann, A.B., Wechsung, I., Schleicher, R.: Measurements and concepts of usability and user experience: Differences between industry and academia. In: Kurosu, M. (ed.) HCD 2009. LNCS, vol. 5619, pp. 618–626. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sisira Adikari
    • 1
  • Craig McDonald
    • 1
  • John Campbell
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Information Sciences and EngineeringUniversity of CanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations