Skip to main content

Linguistically-Based Reranking of Google’s Snippets with GreG

  • Chapter
Advances in Distributed Agent-Based Retrieval Tools

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 361))

  • 453 Accesses

Abstract

We present an experiment evaluating the contribution of a system called GReG for reranking the snippets returned by Google’s search engine in the 10 hits presented to the user and captured by the use of Google’s API. The evaluation aims at establishing whether or not the introduction of deep linguistic information may improve the accuracy of Google or rather it is the opposite case as maintained by the majority of people working in Information Retrieval and using a Bag Of Words approach. We used 900 questions and answers taken from TREC 8 and 9 competitions and execute three different types of evaluation: one without any linguistic aid; a second one with tagging and syntactic constituency contribution; another run with what we call Partial Logical Form. Even though GReG is still work in progress, it is possible to draw clear cut conclusions: adding linguistic information to the evaluation process of the best snippet that can answer a question improves enormously the performance. In another experiment we used the actual texts associated to the Q/A pairs distributed by one of TREC’s participant and got even higher accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bresnan, J.: Lexical-Functional Syntax. Blackwell, Malden (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • ComLex, http://nlp.cs.nyu.edu/comlex

  • Baker, C.F., Fillmore, C.J., Lowe, J.B.: The Berkeley FrameNet project. In: Proceedings of COLING-ACL 1998, Montreal, Canada (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellsworth, M., Erk, K., Kingsbury, P., Pado, S.: PropBank, SALSA, and FrameNet: How design determines product. In: Proceedings of the LREC 2004 Workshop on Building Lexical Resources from Semantically Annotated Corpora, Lisbon (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fellbaum, C. (ed.): WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Delmonte, R. (ed.): Computational Linguistic Text Processing – Logical Form, Semantic Interpretation, Discourse Relations and Question Answering. Nova Science Publishers, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Delmonte, R.: Computational Linguistic Text Processing – Lexicon, Grammar, Parsing and Anaphora Resolution. Nova Science Publishers, New York (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Delmonte, R.: Deep & Shallow Linguistically Based Parsing. In: Delmonte, R., Di Sciullo, A.M. (eds.) UG and External Systems, pp. 335–374. John Benjamins, Amsterdam (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Delmonte, R., Bristot, A., Piccolino Boniforti, M.A., Tonelli, S.: Entailment and Anaphora Resolution in RTE3. In: ACL Workshop on Text Entailment and Paraphrasing, Prague, ACL Madison, USA, pp. 48–53 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cui, H., Sun, R., Li, K., Kan, M.-Y., Chua, T.-S.: Question Answering Pas-sage Retrieval Using Dependency Relations. In: SIGIR 2005, pp. 400–406. ACM, Salvador (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Litkowski, K.C.: Syntactic Clues and Lexical Resources in Question-Answering. In: Voorhees, E.M., Harman, D.K. (eds.) The Ninth Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-9), pp. 157–166. NIST Special Publication, Gaithersburg (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, M., Smith, N.A., Mitamura, T.: What is the Jeopardy Model? A Quasi-Synchronous Grammar for QA. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning, Prague, pp. 22–32 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Traum, D., Habash, N.: Generation from Lexical Conceptual Structure. In: Workshop on Applied Interlinguas, ANLP 2000, Seattle, WA, pp. 123–134 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Delmonte, R., Tripodi, R. (2011). Linguistically-Based Reranking of Google’s Snippets with GreG. In: Pallotta, V., Soro, A., Vargiu, E. (eds) Advances in Distributed Agent-Based Retrieval Tools. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 361. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21384-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21384-7_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-21383-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-21384-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics