Advertisement

Design of Emergent and Adaptive Virtual Players in a War RTS Game

  • José A. García Gutiérrez
  • Carlos Cotta
  • Antonio J. Fernández Leiva
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6686)

Abstract

Basically, in (one-player) war Real Time Strategy (wRTS) games a human player controls, in real time, an army consisting of a number of soldiers and her aim is to destroy the opponent’s assets where the opponent is a virtual (i.e., non-human player controlled) player that usually consists of a pre-programmed decision-making script. These scripts have usually associated some well-known problems (e.g., predictability, non-rationality, repetitive behaviors, and sensation of artificial stupidity among others). This paper describes a method for the automatic generation of virtual players that adapt to the player skills; this is done by building initially a model of the player behavior in real time during the game, and further evolving the virtual player via this model in-between two games. The paper also shows preliminary results obtained on a one-player wRTS game constructed specifically for experimentation.

Keywords

Player Behavior Player Skill Strategy Game Human Player Convex Obstacle 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Lidén, L.: Artificial stupidity: The art of intentional mistakes. In: AI Game Programming Wisdom 2, pp. 41–48. Charles River Media, Inc. (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ahlquist, J.B., Novak, J.: Game Artificial Intelligence. Game Development essentials. Thomson Delmar Learning, Canada (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Buro, M.: Call for AI research in RTS games. In: Fu, D., Orkin, J. (eds.) AAAI workshop on Challenges in Game AI, San Jose, pp. 139–141 (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Corruble, V., Madeira, C.A.G., Ramalho, G.: Steps toward building of a good ai for complex wargame-type simulation games. In: Mehdi, Q.H., Gough, N.E. (eds.) 3rd International Conference on Intelligent Games and Simulation (GAME-ON 2002), London, UK (2002)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Forbus, K.D., Mahoney, J.V., Dill, K.: How qualitative spatial reasoning can improve strategy game ais. IEEE Intelligent Systems 17(4), 25–30 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Louis, S.J., Miles, C.: Playing to learn: case-injected genetic algorithms for learning to play computer games. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 9(6), 669–681 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Stanley, K.O., Bryant, B.D., Miikkulainen, R.: Real-time neuroevolution in the nero video game. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 9(6), 653–668 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Livingstone, D.: Coevolution in hierarchical ai for strategy games. In: IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Games (CIG 2005), Essex, UK, IEEE, Los Alamitos (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Miles, C., Louis, S.J.: Co-evolving real-time strategy game playing influence map trees with genetic algorithms. In:International Congress on Evolutionary Computation, Portland, Oregon. IEEE press, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lichocki, P., Krawiec, K., Jaśkowski, W.: Evolving teams of cooperating agents for real-time strategy game. In: Giacobini, M., Brabazon, A., Cagnoni, S., Di Caro, G.A., Ekárt, A., Esparcia-Alcázar, A.I., Farooq, M., Fink, A., Machado, P. (eds.) EvoWorkshops 2009. LNCS, vol. 5484, pp. 333–342. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Beume, N.,et al.: Intelligent anti-grouping in real-time strategy games. In: International Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Games, Perth, Australia, pp. 63–70 (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Keaveney, D., O’Riordan, C.: Evolving robust strategies for an abstract real-time strategy game. In: International Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Games, Milano. Italy, pp. 371–378. IEEE press, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hagelbäck, J., Johansson, S.J.: A multi-agent potential field-based bot for a full RTS game scenario. In: Darken, C., Youngblood, G.M. (eds.) Proc. Fifth Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment Conference (AIIDE 2009), Stanford, California, USA, The AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2009)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sweetser, P.: Emergence in Games. Game development. Charles River Media, Boston (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • José A. García Gutiérrez
    • 1
  • Carlos Cotta
    • 1
  • Antonio J. Fernández Leiva
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. Lenguajes y Ciencias de la Computación, ETSI InformáticaUniversidad de MálagaMálagaSpain

Personalised recommendations