Skip to main content

Moderate Contact between Sub-populations Promotes Evolved Assortativity Enabling Group Selection

  • Conference paper
Advances in Artificial Life. Darwin Meets von Neumann (ECAL 2009)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 5778))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Group selection is easily observed when spatial group structure is imposed on a population. In fact, spatial structure is just a means of providing assortative interactions such that the benefits of cooperating are delivered to other cooperators more than to selfish individuals. In principle, assortative interactions could be supported by individually adapted traits without physical grouping. But this possibility seems to be ruled-out because any ’marker’ that cooperators used for this purpose could be adopted by selfish individuals also. However, here we show that stable assortative marking can evolve when sub-populations at different evolutionarily stable strategies (ESSs) are brought into contact. Interestingly, if they are brought into contact too quickly, individual selection causes loss of behavioural diversity before assortative markers have a chance to evolve. But if they are brought into contact slowly, moderate initial mixing between sub-populations produces a pressure to evolve traits that facilitate assortative interactions. Once assortative interactions have become established, group competition between the two ESSs is facilitated without any spatial group structure. This process thus illustrates conditions where individual selection canalises groups that are initially spatially defined into stable groups that compete without the need for continued spatial separation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Sober, E., Wilson, D.S.: Unto others: the evolution of psychology and unselfish behavior. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dawkins, R.: The Selfish Gene. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Maynard Smith, J.: Evolution and the Theory of Games. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1982)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Wilson, D.S., Sober, E.: Reintroducing group selection to the human behavioral sciences. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17(4), 585–654 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wilson, D.S.: A theory of group selection. PNAS 72(1), 143–146 (1975)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Powers, S.T., Watson, R.A.: Evolution of individual group size preferences can increase group-level selection and cooperation. In: Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Artificial Life (2009) (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wilson, D.S.: Complex interactions in metacommunities, with implications for biodiversity and higher levels of selection. Ecology 73, 1984–2000 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Boyd, R., Richerson, P.J.: Group Selection among Alternative evolutionarily Stable Strategies. J. Theor. Biol. 145, 331–342 (1990)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. McElreath, R., Boyd, R., Richerson, P.J.: Shared norms and the evolution of ethnic markers. Current Anthropology 44(1), 122–129 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Boyd, R., Richerson, P.J.: Culture and the Evolutionary Process. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wilson, D.S., Dugatkin, L.A.: Group selection and assortative interactions. Am. Nat. 149, 336–351 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Powers, S.T., Mills, R., Penn, A.S., Watson, R.A.: Social Environment Construction Provides an Adaptive Explanation for New Levels of Individuality. In: Proceedings of ECAL 2009 Workshop on Levels of Selection and Individuality in Evolution: Conceptual Issues and the Role of Artificial Life Models (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mills, R., Watson, R.A.: Symbiosis enables the evolution of rare complexes in structured environments. In: Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Artificial Life (2009) (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Watson, R.A., Palmius, N., Mills, R., Powers, S.T., Penn, A.S.: Can selfish symbioses effect higher-level selection? In: Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Artificial Life (2009) (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Snowdon, J.R., Powers, S.T., Watson, R.A. (2011). Moderate Contact between Sub-populations Promotes Evolved Assortativity Enabling Group Selection. In: Kampis, G., Karsai, I., Szathmáry, E. (eds) Advances in Artificial Life. Darwin Meets von Neumann. ECAL 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5778. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21314-4_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21314-4_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-21313-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-21314-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics