Skip to main content

Update Dynamics, Strategy Exchanges and the Evolution of Cooperation in the Snowdrift Game

  • Conference paper
  • 1675 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 5778))

Abstract

We verify through numerical simulations that the influence of the update dynamics on the evolution of cooperation in the Snowdrift game is closely related to the number of strategy exchanges between agents. The results show that strategy exchanges contribute to the destruction of compact clusters favorable to cooperator agents. In general, strategy exchanges decrease as the synchrony rate decreases. This explains why smaller synchrony rates are beneficial to cooperators in situations where a large number of exchanges occur with synchronous updating. On the other hand, this is coherent with the fact that the Snowdrift game is completely insensitive to the synchrony rate when the replicator dynamics transition rule is used: there are almost no strategy exchanges when this rule is used.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Axelrod, R.: The Evolution of Cooperation. Penguin Books (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Grilo, C., Correia, L.: Asynchronous Stochastic Dynamics and the Spatial Prisoner’s Dilemma Game. In: Neves, J., Santos, M.F., Machado, J.M. (eds.) EPIA 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4874, pp. 235–246. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Grilo, C., Correia, L.: The Influence of Asynchronous Dynamics in the Spatial Prisoner’s Dilemma Game. In: Asada, M., Hallam, J.C.T., Meyer, J.-A., Tani, J. (eds.) SAB 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5040, pp. 362–371. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Grilo, C., Correia, L.: What makes the spatial prisoner’s dilemma game sensitive to asynchronism? In: Proceedings of the 11th Int. Conf. on the Simulation and Synthesis of Living Systems, Alife XI, pp. 212–219. MIT Press, Cambridge (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Grilo, C., Correia, L.: The influence of the update dynamics on the evolution of cooperation. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, Special Issue on Computational Intelligence Issues in Systems Experiencing Nonlinear Dynamics and Synchronization 2(2), 104–114 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hauert, C., Doebeli, M.: Spatial structure often inhibits the evolution of cooperation in the snowdrift game. Nature 428, 643–646 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hofbauer, J., Sigmund, K.: Evolutionary Games and Population Dynamics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Huberman, B., Glance, N.: Evolutionary games and computer simulations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 90, 7716–7718 (1993)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Newth, D., Cornforth, D.: Asynchronous spatial evolutionary games: spatial patterns, diversity and chaos. In: Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, pp. 2463–2470 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nowak, M., Bonhoeffer, S., May, R.M.: More spatial games. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos 4(1), 33–56 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Oh, J.C.: Cooperating search agents explore more than defecting search agents in the internet information access. In: Proceedings of the 2001 Congress on Evolutionary Computation, CEC 2001, pp. 1261–1268. IEEE Press, Los Alamitos (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Smith, J.M.: Evolution and the Theory of Games. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1982)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Tomassini, M., Luthi, L., Giacobini, M.: Hawks and doves on small-world networks. Physical Review E 73(1), 016132 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Watts, D., Strogatz, S.H.: Collective dynamics of small-world networks. Nature 393, 440–442 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Grilo, C., Correia, L. (2011). Update Dynamics, Strategy Exchanges and the Evolution of Cooperation in the Snowdrift Game. In: Kampis, G., Karsai, I., Szathmáry, E. (eds) Advances in Artificial Life. Darwin Meets von Neumann. ECAL 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5778. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21314-4_40

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21314-4_40

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-21313-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-21314-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics