Skip to main content

Abstract

This paper reconsiders the single commodity allocation problem (SCAP) for disaster recovery, which determines where and how to stockpile a commodity before a disaster and how to route the commodity once the disaster has hit. It shows how to scale the SCAP algorithm proposed in [1] to a geographical area with up to 1,000 storage locations (over a million decision variables). More precisely, the paper shows that spatial and objective decompositions are instrumental in solving SCAP problems at the state scale (e.g., for the state of Florida). The practical benefits of these decompositions are demonstrated on large-scale hurricane disaster scenarios generated by Los Alamos National Laboratory using state-of-the-art disaster simulation tools.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Van Hentenryck, P., Bent, R., Coffrin, C.: Strategic Planning for Disaster Recovery with Stochastic Last Mile Distribution. In: [17], pp. 318–333

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wassenhove, L.V.: Humanitarian aid logistics: supply chain management in high gear. Journal of the Operational Research Society 57(1), 475–489 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Beamon, B.: Humanitarian relief chains: Issues and challenges. In: 34th International Conference on Computers & Industrial Engineering, pp. 77–82 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. United-States Government: The Federal Response to Hurricane Katrina: Lessons Learned (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fritz Institute.: Fritz Institute Website (2008), http://www.fritzinstitute.org

  6. Barbarosoglu, G., Ozdamar, L., Cevik, A.: An interactive approach for hierarchical analysis of helicopter logistics in disaster relief operations. European Journal of Operational Research 140(1), 118–133 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Duran, S., Gutierrez, M., Keskinocak, P.: Pre-positioning of emergency items worldwide for care international. Interfaces (2009) (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Balcik, B., Beamon, B., Smilowitz, K.: Last mile distribution in humanitarian relief. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems 12(2), 51–63 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gunnec, D., Salman, F.: A two-stage multi-criteria stochastic programming model for location of emergency response and distribution centers. In: INOC (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Campbell, A.M., Vandenbussche, D., Hermann, W.: Routing for relief efforts. Transportation Science 42(2), 127–145 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Griffin, P., Scherrer, C., Swann, J.: Optimization of community health center locations and service offerings with statistical need estimation. IIE Transactions (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gunes, C., van Hoeve, W.J., Tayur, S.: Vehicle routing for food rescue programs: A comparison of different approaches. In: [17], pp. 176–180

    Google Scholar 

  13. Toth, P., Vigo, D.: The Vehicle Routing Problem. SIAM Monographs on Discrete Mathematics and Applications, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ignizio, J.P.: A review of goal programming: A tool for multiobjective analysis. The Journal of the Operational Research Society 29(11), 1109–1119 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. FEMA: FEMA HAZUS Overview (2010), http://www.fema.gov/plan/prevent/hazus

  16. Dynadec, Inc.: Comet 2.1 User Manual (2009), http://dynadec.com/

  17. Lodi, A., Milano, M., Toth, P. (eds.): CPAIOR 2010. LNCS, vol. 6140. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Coffrin, C., Van Hentenryck, P., Bent, R. (2011). Spatial and Objective Decompositions for Very Large SCAPs. In: Achterberg, T., Beck, J.C. (eds) Integration of AI and OR Techniques in Constraint Programming for Combinatorial Optimization Problems. CPAIOR 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6697. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21311-3_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21311-3_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-21310-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-21311-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics