Skip to main content

Learning Discriminant Rules as a Minimal Saturation Search

  • Conference paper
  • 764 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6489))

Abstract

It is well known that for certain relational learning problems, traditional top-down search falls into blind search. Recent works in Inductive Logic Programming about phase transition and crossing plateau show that no general solution can face to all these difficulties. In this context, we introduce the notion of “minimal saturation” to build non-blind refinements of hypotheses in a bidirectional approach.

We present experimental results of this approach on some benchmarks inspired by constraint satisfaction problems. These problems can be specified in first order logic but most existing ILP systems fail to learn a correct definition, especially because they fall into blind search.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alphonse, É., Osmani, A.: A model to study phase transition and plateaus in relational learning. In: Železný, F., Lavrač, N. (eds.) ILP 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5194, pp. 6–23. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Alphonse, É., Osmani, A.: On the connection between the phase transition of the covering test and the learning success rate in ilp. Machine Learning 70(2-3), 135–150 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Alphonse, E., Osmani, A.: Empirical study of relational learning algorithms in the phase transition framework. In: Buntine, W., Grobelnik, M., Mladenić, D., Shawe-Taylor, J. (eds.) ECML PKDD 2009. LNCS, vol. 5781, pp. 51–66. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Alphonse, É., Rouveirol, C.: Lazy propositionalisation for relational learning. In: Horn, W. (ed.) ECAI, pp. 256–260. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Alphonse, É., Rouveirol, C.: Extension of the top-down data-driven strategy to ILP. In: Muggleton, S.H., Otero, R.P., Tamaddoni-Nezhad, A. (eds.) ILP 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4455, pp. 49–63. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Botta, M., Giordana, A., Saitta, L., Sebag, M.: Relational learning: Hard problems and phase transitions. In: Lamma, E., Mello, P. (eds.) AI*IA 1999. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1792, pp. 178–189. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Botta, M., Giordana, A., Saitta, L., Sebag, M.: Relational learning as search in a critical region. Journal of Machine Learning Research 4, 431–463 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Lallouet, A., Lopez, M., Martin, L., Vrain, C.: On learning constraint problems. In: 22th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, ICTAI 2010 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lodhi, H., Muggleton, S.: Is mutagenesis still challenging. In: ILP - Late-Breaking Papers (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Muggleton, S.: Inverse entailment and progol. New Generation Computing, Special issue on Inductive Logic Programming 13(3-4), 245–286 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ross Quinlan, J., Mike Cameron-Jones, R.: Foil: A midterm report. In: Brazdil, P.B. (ed.) ECML 1993. LNCS, vol. 667, Springer, Heidelberg (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  12. De Raedt, L., Van Laer, W.: Inductive constraint logic. In: ALT, pp. 80–94 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rouveirol, C.: Extensions of inversion of resolution applied to theory completion. In: Muggleton, S. (ed.) ILP, pp. 63–92. AP (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Serra, A., Giordana, A., Saitta, L.: Learning on the phase transition edge. In: IJCAI, pp. 921–926 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Srinivasan, A.: A learning engine for proposing hypotheses (Aleph), http://www.comlab.ox.ac.uk/activities/machinelearning/Aleph/aleph.html

  16. Tang, L.P.R.: Integrating top-down and bottom-up approaches in inductive logic programming: applications in natural language processing and relational data mining. PhD thesis, University of Texas, Supervisor-Mooney (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lopez, M., Martin, L., Vrain, C. (2011). Learning Discriminant Rules as a Minimal Saturation Search. In: Frasconi, P., Lisi, F.A. (eds) Inductive Logic Programming. ILP 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6489. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21295-6_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21295-6_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-21294-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-21295-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics