Skip to main content

Finding Shuffle Words That Represent Optimal Scheduling of Shared Memory Access

  • Conference paper
Language and Automata Theory and Applications (LATA 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 6638))

Abstract

In the present paper, we introduce and study the problem of computing, for any given finite set of words, a shuffle word with a minimum so-called scope coincidence degree. The scope coincidence degree is the maximum number of different symbols that parenthesise any position in the shuffle word. This problem is motivated by an application of a new automaton model and can be regarded as the problem of scheduling shared memory accesses of some parallel processes in a way that minimises the number of memory cells required. We investigate the complexity of this problem and show that it can be solved in polynomial time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Conway, R.W., Maxwell, W.L., Miller, L.W.: Theory of Scheduling. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading (1967)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Flajolet, P., Gardy, D., Thimonier, L.: Birthday paradox, coupon collectors, caching algorithms and self-organizing search. Discrete Applied Mathematics 39, 207–229 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Graham, R., Lawler, E., Lenstra, J., Kan, A.: Optimization and approximation in deterministic sequencing and scheduling: a survey. Annals of Discrete Mathematics 5, 287–326 (1979)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Horwitz, L.P., Karp, R.M., Miller, R.E., Winograd, S.: Index register allocation. Journal of the ACM 13, 43–61 (1966)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Maier, D.: The complexity of some problems on subsequences and supersequences. Journal of the ACM 25, 322–336 (1978)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Pereira, F.M.Q.: A survey on register allocation (2008), http://compilers.cs.ucla.edu/fernando/publications/drafts/survey.pdf

  7. Reidenbach, D., Schmid, M.L.: A polynomial time match test for large classes of extended regular expressions. In: Domaratzki, M., Salomaa, K. (eds.) CIAA 2010. LNCS, vol. 6482, pp. 241–250. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Reidenbach, D., Schmid, M.L. (2011). Finding Shuffle Words That Represent Optimal Scheduling of Shared Memory Access. In: Dediu, AH., Inenaga, S., Martín-Vide, C. (eds) Language and Automata Theory and Applications. LATA 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6638. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21254-3_37

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21254-3_37

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-21253-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-21254-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics