Advertisement

Evaluation of Software Process Assessment Methods – Case Study

  • Mohammad Zarour
  • Alain Abran
  • Jean-Marc Desharnais
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 155)

Abstract

Evaluation of competing software process assessment (SPA) methods is an important issue for software process improvement initiatives. Although SPA methods designers may claim successful design and implementations of their SPA methods, no evaluation of these claims, based on a set of evaluation criteria, has yet been documented. In addition, independent evaluation of the SPA methods currently available would also help the designers of these methods. This paper presents as a case study the results of applying the proposed evaluation criteria to the MARES SPA method.

Keywords

Software Process Assessment Improvement Evaluation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    López, M.: Application of an evaluation framework for analyzing the architecture tradeoff analysis method. Journal of Systems and Software 68, 233–241 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Scriven, M.: Evaluation Thesaurus. Sage Publications, Newbury Park (1991)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shadish, W., Cook, T., Leviton, L.: Foundations of Program Evaluation. Theories of Practice. Sage Publications, Newbury Park (1993)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Worthen, B., Sanders, J., Fitzpatrick, J.: Program Evaluation. Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines. Addison Wesley Longman, New York (1997)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zarour, M., Abran, A., Desharnais, J.M., Buglione, L.: Design and Implementation of Lightweight Software Process Assessment Methods: Survey of Best Practices. In: Proceedings of the 10th Software Process Improvement & Capability dEtermination conference (SPICE 2010), Pisa, Italy, pp. 39–50 (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Anacleto, A., Wangenheim, C., Salviano, C., Savi, R.: A method for Process Assessment in Small Software Companies. In: 4th International SPICE Conference on Process Assessment and Improvement, Portugal (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wangenheim, C., Anacleto, A., Salviano, C.F.: MARES - A Methodology for Software Process Assessment in Small Software Companies, Technical Report: LQPS001_04E, LPQS - Universidade do Vale do Itajai, Brazil, Technical Report (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    ISO/IEC, ISO/IEC 15504 Information Technology - Process Assessment - Parts 1-5 (2003-2006)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Anacleto, A., Wangenheim, C.G., Salviano, C.F., Savi, R.: Experiences gained from applying ISO/IEC 15504 to small software companies in Brazil. In: 4th International SPICE Conference on Process Assessment and Improvement, Lisbon, Portugal (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wangenheim, C., Varkoi, T., Salviano, C.F.: Standard based software process assessments in small companies. Software Process Improvement and Practice 11, 329–335 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wangenheim, C., Weber, S., Hauckc, J., Trentind, G.: Experiences on establishing software processes in small companies. Information and Software Technology 48, 890–900 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wangenheim, C.G., Anacleto, A., Salviano, C.F.: Helping small companies assess software processes. IEEE Software 23, 91–98 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wangenheim, C.G.v., Varkoi, T., Salviano, C.F.: Performing ISO 15504 Conformant Software Process Assessment in Small Software Companies. In: EUROSPI 2005, Hungary (2005)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    CMMI-Team, CMU/SEI-2006-TR-011: Appraisal Requirements for CMMI, Version 1.2 (ARC, V1.2), SCAMPI Upgrade Team, Carnegie Mellon Software Engineering Institute, Pittsburgh, PA CMU/SEI-2006-TR-011 (August 2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohammad Zarour
    • 1
  • Alain Abran
    • 2
  • Jean-Marc Desharnais
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Software EngineeringPetra UniversityAmmanJordan
  2. 2.Department of Software and IT EngineeringÉcole de Technologie SupérieureMontréalCanada
  3. 3.Computer EngineeringBogazici UniversityBebekTurkey

Personalised recommendations