Skip to main content

A Modeling View of Process Improvement

  • Conference paper
Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination (SPICE 2011)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 155))

Abstract

As a consequence of Software Process Improvement success there are forces that urge for further evolution. One force is the need for eliciting and refining underlying SPI principles. This article introduces a modeling view of process and process improvement with three types of process models (Process Capability Profile, Process Enactment Description and Process Performance Indicator) and an example on a process improvement cycle. This modeling view improves the integrated understanding of what we want, what is the current status, what we can do and what we are doing for improvement during a cycle. This modeling view is then used as a basis for introducing Modeling driven (Knowledge Working) Process Improvement as an evolution of current Model-based (Software, Systems and Services) Process Improvement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Humphrey, W.S.: Managing the Software Process. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rout, T.P., El Emam, K., Fusani, M., Goldenson, D., Jung, H.-W.: SPICE in retrospect: Developing a standard for process assessment. J. Syst. Software (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. CMMI Product Team, CMMI® for Development, Version 1.3, Improving processes for developing better products and services. Technical Report, CMU/SEI-2010-TR-033, ESC-TR-2010-033, Software Engineering Process Management Program (November 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. The International Organization for Standardization and the International Electrotechnical Commission. ISO/IEC 15504, composed of seven parts (15504-1 to 15504-7) parts, under the general title Information technology — Process assessment (2004-2008)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dorling, A.: Next Generation 15504 - the 33001 series of Standards – UPDATE, August 24 (2009), http://www.spiceusergroup.org

  6. Salviano, C.F.: Model-Driven Process Capability Engineering for Knowledge Working Intensive Organization. In: Proc. of 8th Int. SPICE Conf., Nuremberg, Germany, pp. 1–9 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pries-Heje, J., Johansen, J. (chief eds.): SPI Manifesto, eurospi. net, version A.1.2 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Potts, C.: Software-Engineering Research Revised. IEEE Sw. 10(5), 19–28 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bézivin, J.: On The Unification Power of Models. In: Software and System Modeling (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Favre, J.M.: Megamodeling and Etymology - A story of Words: from MED to MDE via MODEL in five millenniums, ADELE Team, LSR-IMAG, University of Grenoble, France (2004), http://www-adele.imag.fr/~jmfavre

  11. Rothenberg, J.: AI, Simulation & Modeling. In: Widman, L.E., Loparo, K.A., Nielsen, N.R. (eds.) The nature of modeling, August 1989, pp. 75–92. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Chichester (1989); (Reprinted as N−3027−DARPA, The RAND Corporation, November 1989)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Atkin, A.: Peirce’s Theory of Signs. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2010), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2010/entries/peirce-semiotics/

  13. Drucker, P.: Landmarks of Tomorrow - A Report on the New ’Post-Modern’ World. Harper & Row, New York (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Salviano, C.F.: A Multi-Model Process Improvement Methodology Driven by Capability Profiles. In: Proc. of IEEE COMPSAC, Seattle, USA, pp. 636–637 (2009), doi:10.1109/COMPSAC.2009.94

    Google Scholar 

  15. Salviano, C.F., Martinez, M.R.M., Banhesse, E.L., Enelize, A., Zoucas, A., Thiry, M.: A Method for Tridimensional Process Assessment Using Modelling Theory. In: Proc. of IEEE Seventh QUATIC, Porto, Portugal, pp. 430–435 (2010), doi:10.1109/QUATIC.2010.95

    Google Scholar 

  16. Card, D.N.: Research Directions in Software Process Improvement. In: Proc. 28th IEEE Int. Comp. Sw. and App. Conf., Hong Kong, China, September 27-30, pp. 238–239 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Salviano, C.F. (2011). A Modeling View of Process Improvement. In: O’Connor, R.V., Rout, T., McCaffery, F., Dorling, A. (eds) Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination. SPICE 2011. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 155. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21233-8_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21233-8_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-21232-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-21233-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics