Skip to main content

An Efficient Hybrid Classification Algorithm – An Example from Palliative Care

  • Conference paper
Hybrid Artificial Intelligent Systems (HAIS 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6679))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper we present an efficient hybrid classification algorithm based on combining case-based reasoning and random decision trees, which is based on a general approach for combining lazy and eager learning methods. We use this hybrid classification algorithm to predict the pain classification for palliative care patients, and compare the resulting classification accuracy to other similar algorithms. The hybrid algorithm consistently produces a lower average error than the base algorithms it combines, but at a higher computational cost.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aamodt, A., Plaza, E.: Case-based reasoning: Foundational issues, methodological variations, and system approaches. AI Communications 7(1), 39–59 (1994), http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=196108.196115

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bian, S., Wang, W.: On diversity and accuracy of homogeneous and heterogeneous ensembles. Int. J. Hybrid Intell. Syst. 4, 103–128 (2007), http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1367006.1367010

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Breiman, L.: Random forests. Machine Learning 45, 5–32 (2001), http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Bruland, T., Aamodt, A., Langseth, H.: Architectures integrating case-based reasoning and bayesian networks for clinical decision support. In: Shi, Z., Vadera, S., Aamodt, A., Leake, D. (eds.) IIP 2010. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol. 340, pp. 82–91. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Corchado, J.M., Lees, B., Aiken, J.: Hybrid instance-based system for predicting ocean temperatures. International Journal of Computational Intelligence and Applications, 35–52 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hendrickx, I., van den Bosch, A.: Hybrid algorithms with instance-based classification. In: Gama, J., Camacho, R., Brazdil, P.B., Jorge, A.M., Torgo, L. (eds.) ECML 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3720, pp. 158–169. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Houeland, T.G.: An efficient random decision tree algorithm for case-based reasoning systems. In: FLAIRS Conference. AAAI Press, Menlo Park ( to appear 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Houeland, T.G., Aamodt, A.: The utility problem for lazy learners - towards a non-eager approach. In: Bichindaritz, I., Montani, S. (eds.) ICCBR 2010. LNCS, vol. 6176, pp. 141–155. Springer, Heidelberg (2010), http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14274-1 , doi:10.1007/978-3-642-14274-1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Knudsen, A., Aass, N., Fainsinger, R., Caraceni, A., Klepstad, P., Jordhy, M., Hjermstad, M., Kaasa, S.: Classification of pain in cancer patients a systematic literature review. Palliative Medicine 23(4), 295–308 (2009), http://pmj.sagepub.com/content/23/4/295.abstract

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Minton, S.: Quantitative results concerning the utility of explanation-based learning. Artif. Intell. 42(2-3), 363–391 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mohebpour, M.R., Adznan, B.J., Saripan, M.I.: Grid Base Classifier in Comparison to Nonparametric Methods in Multiclass Classification. Pertanika J. Sci. & Technol. 18(1), 139–154 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Policastro, C., Delbem, A., Mattoso, L., Minatti, E., Ferreira, E., Borato, C., Zanus, M.: A Hybrid Case Based Reasoning Approach for Wine Classification. In: ISDA, pp. 395–400 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Smyth, B., Cunningham, P.: The utility problem analysed - a case-based reasoning perspective. In: Proceedings of the Third European Workshop on Case-Based Reasoning, pp. 392–399. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Veloso, A., Meira, Jr., W.: Eager, lazy and hybrid algorithms for multi-criteria associative classification. In: Proceedings of the Data Mining Algorithms Workshop, Uberlandia, MG (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Houeland, T.G., Aamodt, A. (2011). An Efficient Hybrid Classification Algorithm – An Example from Palliative Care. In: Corchado, E., Kurzyński, M., Woźniak, M. (eds) Hybrid Artificial Intelligent Systems. HAIS 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6679. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21222-2_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21222-2_24

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-21221-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-21222-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics