Zusammenfassung
Seit Ende der 1960er-Jahre gilt der Ultraschall mit der nichtinvasiven Möglichkeit der Bildgebung als Meilenstein des Fortschritts in der Medizin und hat, ausgehend von der Bearbeitung geburtshilflicher Fragestellungen, mittlerweile in nahezu allen Fachdisziplinen eine Schlüsselstellung in der Diagnostik inne. In derselben Zeitspanne greift die kontinuierliche externe elektronische Herzfrequenzregistrierung in breitem klinischem Einsatz auf das in den vorherigen Kapiteln bereits dargestellte Continuous-Wave-Dopplerprinzip zurück.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literatur
Abramowicz JS, Kossoff G, Marsal K, Ter Haar G. (2003) Safety Statement, 2000 (reconfirmed 2003) International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 21: 100
Abramowicz JS, Barnett SB, Duck FA, Edmonds PD, Hynynen KH, Ziskin MC (2008) Fetal thermal effects of diagnostic ultrasound. 27: 54159
AIUM Statement. (2007) Prudent use in obstetrics. Available at: http://www.aiumorg/publications/viewStatement.aspx?id=33. Accessed May 17, 2010
FDA. Fetal Keepsake videos (2009) Available at http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/AlertsandNotices/PatientAlerts/ncm064756.htm. Accessed May 17, 2010
Barnett SB, Kossoff G (1998) Can diagnostic ultrasound heat tissue and cause biological effects? In: Barnett SB, Kossoff G Safety of diagnostic ultrasound. The Parthenon Publishing Group, New York London, pp 2738
Barnett SB, Ter Haar GR, Ziskin MC, Rott HD, Duck FA, Maeda K (2000) International recommendations and guidelines for the safe use of diagnostic ultrasound in medicine. Ultrasound Med Biol. 26(3): 35566
Barnett SB, Maulik D;International Perinatal Doppler Society (2001) Guidelines and recommendations for safe use of Doppler ultrasound in perinatal applications. J Matern Fetal Med. 10(2): 7584
Barnett SB (2001) Intracranial temperature elevation from diagnostic ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol. 27: 8838
Bly S, Van den Hof MC (2005) Diagnostic Imaging Committee, Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada: Obstetric ultrasound biological effects and safety. Obstet Gynaecol Can. 27(6): 57280
Church CC, Miller MW (2007) Quantification of risk from fetal exposure to diagnostik ultrasound. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 93:331-53-Duck FA, Martin K (1992) Exposure values for medical devices. In: Ziskin M, Lewin P Ultrasonic exposimetry. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 315344
Duck FA, Henderson J (1998) Acoustic output of modern ultrasound equipment: is it increasing? In: Barnett SB, Kossoff G Safety of diagnostic ultrasound. The Parthenon Publishing Group, New York London, pp 1525
Duck FA (2008) Hazards, risks and safety of diagnostic ultrasound. Med Eng Phys. 30: 133848
EFSUMB (1998) Newsletter. EFSUMB 11: 814
FDA (1992) Guide for measuring and reporting acoustic output of diagnostic ultrasound. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Techn Bull 1992
Hershkovitz R, Sheiner E, Mazor M. (2002) Ultrasound in obstetrics: a review of safety. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 101(1): 158
Huch R, Schneider KTM, Rott HD (1993) Sicherheitsaspekte der Ultraschall-und Ultraschalldoppler-Sonographie in der Schwangerschaft. Frauenarzt 34: 261263
Merrit CRB, Kremkau FW, Hobbins JC (1992) Diagnostic ultrasound: bioeffects and safety. Ultraound Obstet Gynecol 2: 366374
Miller DL (2008) Safety Assurance in Obstetrical Ultrasound. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 29: 156164
Newnham JP (1998) Studies of ultrasound safety in humans: clinical benefit vs. risk. In: Barnett SB, Kossoff G Safety of diagnostic ultrasound. The Parthenon Publishing Group, New York London, pp 99112
Nyborg WL. (2001) Biological effects of ultrasound: development of safety guidelines. Part II: general review. Ultrasound Med Biol 27(3): 30133
Rott HD (1997) Zur Epidemiologie diagnostischer pränataler Ultraschallexposition. Hautnah Gynäkol Geburtshilfe 5: 212214
Rott HD (1998) EFSUMB: Watchdog Berichte 1997. Ultraschall Med 19: 4750
Ter Haar G. (2010) Ultrasound bioeffects and safety. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 224: 36373
Salvesen KA, Lees C (2009) Ultrasound is not unsound, but safety is an issue. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 33: 51217
Schneider KTM, Lippert A (1991) Der derzeitige Stand der Dopplersonographie. Umfrage an 253 Kliniken in West- und Ostdeutschland, der Schweiz und Österreich. Frauenarzt 33:873874
Stratmeyer ME, Greenleaf JF, Dalecki D, Salvesen KA (2008) Fetal ultrasound: mechanical effects. J Ultrasound Med. 27: 597605
Stone P, Ross I, Pringle K, Flower J (1992) Tissue heating effect of pulsed Doppler ultrasound in the live fetal lamb brain. Fetal Diagn Ther 7: 2630
Tarantal AF (1998) Effects of ultrasound exposure on fetal development in animal models. In: Barnett SB, Kossoff G Safety of diagnostic ultrasound. The Parthenon Publishing Group, New York London, pp 3951
Waldenström U, Axelsson O, Nilsson S, Ekklund G, Fall O, Linderberg S, Sjodin Y (1988) Effects of routine one-stage ultrasound screening in pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2: 585588
Williams A (1991) A critical evaluation of bioeffect reports and epidemiological surveys. In: Docker M, Duck F The safe use of diagnostic ultrasound. British Institute of Radiology, London, pp 3032
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schneider, K. (2012). Sicherheitsaspekte. In: Steiner, H., Schneider, KT. (eds) Dopplersonographie in Geburtshilfe und Gynäkologie. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20938-3_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20938-3_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-48208-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-20938-3
eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)