Advertisement

ALPHA: Proposal of Mapping QoS Parameters between UPnP Home Network and GMPLS Access

  • Lukasz Brewka
  • Pontus Sköldström
  • Anders Gavler
  • Viktor Nordell
  • Henrik Wessing
  • Lars Dittmann
Conference paper
  • 389 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering book series (LNICST, volume 63)

Abstract

This paper is treating the interdomain QoS signaling between the home and access domains with a focus on applying it for providing QoS between a UPnP-QoS based home network and GMPLS based access network. The work presented here is defining a possible approach for an interface between UPnP-QoS and GMPLS in order to move towards end-to-end QoS establishment as well as investigating the complexity of such a solution. We present the QoS parameters and mechanisms in both UPnP-QoS and GMPLS and how they can be matched to create a coherent QoS architecture.

Keywords

Interdomain QoS UPnP-QoS GMPLS Auto-Discovery and Auto-Configuration of end-systems and access devices 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    UPnP Forum. UPnP QoS Architecture:3 Service Template Version 1.01 For UPnP Version 1.0 (November 2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    But, J., Armitage, G., Stewart, L.: Outsourcing automated qos control of home routers for a better online game experience. Communications Magazine, IEEE 46(12), 64–70 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Good, R., Ventura, N.: End to end session based bearer control for ip multimedia subsystems. In: IFIP/IEEE International Symposium on Integrated Network Management, IM 2009, pp. 497–504 (June 2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Welzl, M., Muhlhauser, M.: Scalability and quality of service: a trade-off? Communications Magazine, IEEE 41(6), 32–36 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Common control and measurement plane, http://tools.ietf.org/wg/ccamp/
  6. 6.
    Le Faucheur, F., Wu, L., Davie, B., Davari, S., Vaananen, P., Krishnan, R., Cheval, P., Heinanen, J.: Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) Support of Differentiated Services. RFC 3270 (Proposed Standard), Updated by RFC 5462 (May 2002)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wroclawski, J.: Specification of the Controlled-Load Network Element Service. RFC 2211 (Proposed Standard) (September 1997)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shenker, S., Partridge, C., Guerin, R.: RFC 2212: Specification of guaranteed quality of service, Status: Proposed Standard (September 1997)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Braden, R., Zhang, L., Berson, S., Herzog, S., Jamin, S.: Resource ReSerVation Protocol (RSVP) – Version 1 Functional Specification. RFC 2205 (Proposed Standard), Updated by RFCs 2750, 3936, 4495 (September 1997)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wroclawski, J.: RFC 2210: The use of RSVP with IETF integrated services, Status: PROPOSED STANDARD (September 1997)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    The Broadband Forum. TR-069 CPE WAN Management Protocol v1.1 (December 2007)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    UPnP Forum. UPnP QosManager:3 Service Template Version 1.01 For UPnP Version 1.0 (November 2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jabbari, B., Lehman, T., Sobiesky, J.: Dragon: A framework for service provisioning in heterogenous grid networks. Communications Magazine, IEEE 44(3) (March 2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ICST Institute for Computer Science, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lukasz Brewka
    • 1
  • Pontus Sköldström
    • 2
  • Anders Gavler
    • 2
  • Viktor Nordell
    • 2
  • Henrik Wessing
    • 1
  • Lars Dittmann
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Photonics EngineeringTechnical University of DenmarkKgs. LyngbyDenmark
  2. 2.Department of Networking and Transmission LabAcreo ABKistaSweden

Personalised recommendations