Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Mammographiescreening

  • Chapter
Die Gynäkologie

  • 14k Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Beim Screening (engl. »to screen« = sieben, sichten, überprüfen) werden möglichst alle (gesunden) Menschen einer bestimmten Alters- oder Bevölkerungsgruppe mit einer definierten Untersuchungsmethode auf das Vorhandensein einer Erkrankung hin untersucht. Ziel ist es, frühzeitig Krankheiten zu erkennen und zu behandeln, die noch nicht zu Beschwerden geführt haben. Damit soll die Lebensqualität der Erkrankten gebessert und möglichst auch die Mortalität gesenkt werden.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 199.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Advisory Committee on Cancer Prevention (2000) Recommendations on cancer screening in the European union. Eur J Cancer 36: 1473

    Google Scholar 

  • AGO – Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie, Kommission Mamma der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie e. V. (2011a) Diagnostik und Therapie primärer und metastasierter Mammakarzinome. Früherkennung und Diagnostik. [www.ago-online.de/_download/unprotected/g_mamma_11_1_0_d_15_early_detection_diagnosis.pdf; Zugriff Juli 2011]

  • AGO – Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie, Kommission Mamma der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie e.V (2011b) Diagnostik und Therapie primärer und metastasierter Mammakarzinome. Brustkrebsrisiko und Prävention. [www.ago-online.de/_download/protected/g_mamma_11_1_0_d_mem_16_breast_cancer_risk_prevention.pdf Zugriff Juli 2011]

  • Albert U-S, Altland H, Duda V, Engel J, Geraedts M, Heywang-Köbrunner S, Hölzel D, Kalbheim E, Koller M, König K, Kreienberg R, Kühn T, Lebeau A, Naß-Griegoleit I, Schlake W, Schmutzler R, Schreer I, Schulte H, Schulz-Wendtland R, Wagner U, Kopp I (2008) Stufe-3- Leitlinie Brustkrebs-Früherkennung in Deutschland [www.senologie.org/leitlinien.php; Zugriff Juli 2011]

  • Alexander FE, Anderson TJ, Brown HK, Forrest AP, Hepburn W, Kirkpatrick AE, Muir BB, Prescott RJ, Smith A (1999) 14 years of followup from the Edinburgh randomised trial of breast-cancer screening. Lancet 353 : 1903–1908

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson I, Aspegren K, Janzon L et al. (1988) Mammographic screening and mortality from breast cancer: the Malmö mammographic screening trial. BMJ 297: 943–948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong K, Moye, E, WilliamsS et al. (2007) Screening mammography in women 40 to 49 years of age: a systematic review for the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med 146: 516

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Autier P, Boniol M, La Vecchia C, Vatten L, Gavin A, Héry C, Heanue M (2010) Disparities in breast cancer mortality trends between 30 European countries: retrospective trend analysis of WHO mortality database. BMJ 341: c3620

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baines, CJ, Dayan, R. A tangled web: Factors likely to affect the efficacy of screening mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst 1999; 91: 833

    Google Scholar 

  • Bancej C, Decker K, Chiarelli A, Harrison M, Turner D, Brisson J (2003) Contribution of clinical breast examination to mammography screening in the early detection of breast cancer. J Med Screen 10: 16–21

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barton MB, Harris R, Fletcher SW (1999) Does this patient have breast cancer? The screening clinical breast examination: Should it be done? How? JAMA 282: 1270

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bastardis-Zakas K, Iatrakis G, Navrozoglou I, Peitsidis P, Salakos N, Malakassis P, Zervoudis S (2010) Maximizing the benefits of screening mammography for women 40-49 years old. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 37: 278–282

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baxter N; Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care (2001) Preventive health care, 2001 update: should women be routinely taught breast self-examination to screen for breast cancer? Can Med Assoc J 164: 1837–1846

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker N, Junkermann H (2008) Nutzen und Risiko des Mammographiescreenings. Dtsch Ärztebl 105(8) 131–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Berrington de Gonzalez A, Reeves G (2005) Mammographic screening before age 50 years in the UK: comparison of the radiation risks with the mortality benefits. Br J Cancer 93: 590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry DA, Cronin KA, Plevritis SK et al. (2005) Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer. N Engl J Med 353: 1784

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bjurstam N, Björneld L, Warwick J, Sala E, Duffy SW, Nyström L, Walker N, Cahlin E, Eriksson O, Hafström LO, Lingaas H, Mattsson J, Persson S, Rudenstam CM, Salander H, Säve-Söderbergh J, Wahlin T (2003) The Gothenburg Breast Screening Trial. Cancer 97: 2387– 2396

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer NT, Salz T, Lillie SE (2007) Systematic review: The long-term effects of false-positive mammograms. Ann Intern Med 146: 502

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Broeders MJ, Peer PG, Straatman H et al. (2001) Diverging breast cancer mortality rates in relation to screening? A comparison of Nijmegen to Arnhem and the Netherlands, 1969–1997. Int J Cancer 92 (2): 303–308

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Buist DS, Anderson ML, Reed SD et al. (2009) Short-term hormone therapy suspension and mammography recall: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 150 :752

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carney PA, Miglioretti DL, Yankaskas BC et al. (2003) Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography. Ann Intern Med 138: 168

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chlebowski RT, Hendrix SL, Langer RD et al.; WHI Investigators (2003) Influence of estrogen plus progestin on breast cancer and mammography in healthy postmenopausal women: the Women's Health Initiative Randomized Trial. JAMA 289: 3243

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy SW, Tabár L, Chen HH et al. (2002) The impact of organized mammography service screening on breast carcinoma mortality in seven Swedish counties. Cancer 95 (3): 458–469

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eddy DM (1989) Screening for breast cancer. Ann Intern Med 111: 389

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elmore JG, Armstrong K, Lehman CD, Fletcher SW (2005) Screening for breast cancer. JAMA 293: 1245–1256

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elmore, JG, Reisch LM, Barton MB et al. (2005) Efficacy of breast cancer screening in the community according to risk level. J Natl Cancer Inst 97: 1035

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ernster VL, Barclay J, Kerlikowske K et al. (1996) Incidence of and treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. JAMA 275: 913

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Feig SA (2004) Screening strategy for breast cancer. Sem Breast Disease 6: 161–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferlay J, Parkin DM, Steliarova-Foucher E (2010) Estimates of cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 2008. Eur J Cancer 46: 765– 781

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Freedman DA, Petitti DB, Robins JM (2004) On the efficacy of screening for breast cancer. Int J Epidemiol 33: 43–55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frisell J, Eklund G, Hellström L, Lidbrink E, Rutqvist LE, Somell A (1991) Randomized study of mammography screening--preliminary report on mortality in the Stockholm trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat 18: 49–56

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frisell J, Lidbrink E, Hellstrom L, Rutqvist LE (1997) Follow-up after 11 years – update of mortality results in the Stockholm mammographic screening trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat 45: 263–270

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • GBA (2011) Richtlinie des Gemeinsamen Bundesausschusses über die Früherkennung von Krebserkrankungen (Krebsfrüherkennungs- Richtlinie/KFE-RL) in der Fassung vom 18. Juni 2009 veröffentlicht im Bundesanzeiger 2009, Nr. 148a in Kraft getreten am 3. Oktober 2009, zuletzt geändert am 16. Dezember 2010, veröffentlicht im Bundesanzeiger 2011; Nr. 34: S. 864, in Kraft getreten am 3. März 2011 [www.g-ba.de/downloads/62-492-510/RL_KFU_2010-12-16.pdf; Zugriff Juli 2011]

  • Gordon PB (2002) Ultrasound for breast cancer screening and staging. Radiol Clin N Am 40: 431–441

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gøtzsche PC, Nielsen M (2009) Screening for breast cancer with mammography. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (4): CD001877

    Google Scholar 

  • Gronwald J, Pijpe A, Byrski T et al. (2008) Early radiation exposures and BRCA1-associated breast cancer in young women from Poland. Breast Cancer Res Treat 112: 581

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hackshaw A (2003) EUSOMA review of mammography screening. Ann Oncol 14: 1193–1195

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hackshaw AK, Paul EA (2003) Breast self-examination and death from breast cancer: a meta-analysis. Br J Cancer 88: 1047

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hambly NM, McNicholas MM, Phelan N, Hargaden GC, O'Doherty A, Flanagan FL (2009) Comparison of digital mammography and screen-film mammography in breast cancer screening: a review in the Irish breast screening program. Am J Roentgenol 193: 1010–1018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris R, Leininger L (1995) Clinical strategies for breast cancer screening: weighing and using the evidence. Ann Intern Med 122 (7): 539–547

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey JA, Pinkerton JV, Herman CR (1997) Short-term cessation of hormone replacement therapy and improvement of mammographic specificity. J Natl Cancer Inst 89: 1623

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hendrick RE, Smith RA, Rutledge JH, Smart CR (1997) Benefit of screening mammography in women aged 40–49: a new metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 22: 87–92

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hofvind S, Vacek PM, Skelly J, Weaver DL, Geller BM (2008) Comparing screening mammography for early breast cancer detection in Vermont and Norway. J Natl Cancer Inst 100: 1082–1091

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hulka BS, Moorman PG (2008) Breast cancer: hormones and other risk factors. Maturitas 61: 203–213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey LL, Helfand M, Chan BK, Woolf SH (2002) Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 137: 347

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • IARC Handbooks of Cancer Prevention, Vol. 7: Breast Cancer Screening, eds. H. Vainio and F. Bianchini, IARC Press, Lyon 2002 [www.iarc.fr/en/publications/pdfs-online/prev/handbook7/Handbook7_Breast-0.pdf ]

  • Irwig L, Houssami N, van Vliet C (2004) New technologies in screening for breast cancer: a systematic review of their accuracy. Br J Cancer 90: 2118–2122

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jatoi I (2003) Screening clinical breast examination. Surg Clin North Am 83: 789–801

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D (2011) Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 61: 69–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Thun MJ (2009) Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin 59: 225–49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jonsson H, Nyström L, Törnberg S et al. (2001) Service screening with mammography of women aged 50–69 years in Sweden: effects on mortality from breast cancer. J Med Screen 8 (3): 152–160

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karssemeijer N, Bluekens AM, Beijerinck D, Deurenberg JJ, Beekman M, Visser R, van Engen R, Bartels-Kortland A, Broeders MJ (2009) Breast cancer screening results 5 years after introduction of digital mammography in a population-based screening program. Radiology 253 (2): 353–358 [Epub ahead of print 2009 Sep 29]

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerlikowske K, Salzmann P, Phillips KA et al. (1999) Continuing screening mammography in women aged 70 to 79 years. Impact on life expectancy and cost-effectiveness. JAMA 282: 2156

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kooperationsgemeinschaft Mammographie (2009) Evaluationsbericht 2005–2007. [www.mammo-programm.de/cms_upload/datenpool/evaluationsbericht05-07_web.pdf ]

  • Kooperationsgemeinschaft Mammographie (2010) Qualitätsbericht 2005–2007. [www.mammo-programm.de/cms_upload/datenpool/qualitaetsbericht_web.pdf ]

  • Kornguth PJ, Rimer BK, Conaway MR et al. (1993) Impact of patientcontrolled compression on the mammography experience. Radiology 186: 99

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kösters JP, Gøtzsche PC (2003) Regular self-examination or clinical examination for early detection of breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD003373

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin LJ, Minkin S, Boyd NF (2009) Hormone therapy, mammographic density, and breast cancer risk. Maturitas 64: 20–26

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miller AB, Baines CJ, To T et al. (1992) Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 2. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 50 to 59 years. CMAJ 147 (10): 1477–1488

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miller AB, To T, Baines CJ, Wall C (2000) Canadian National Breast Screening Study 2: 13-year results of a randomized trial in women aged 50–59 years. J Natl Cancer Inst 92: 1490

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miller AB, To T, Baines CJ et al. (2002) The Canadian National Breast Screening Study 1: Breast cancer mortality after 11 to 16 years of follow-up. A randomized screening trial of mammography in women age 40 to 49 years. Ann Intern Med 137 (5 Part 1): 305– 312

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moss SM, Cuckle H, Evans A, Johns L, Waller M, Bobrow L; Trial Management Group (2006) Effect of mammographic screening from age 40 years on breast cancer mortality at 10 years' follow-up: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 368: 2053–2060

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson HD, Tyne K, Naik A, Bougatsos C, Chan B, Nygren P, Humphrey L (2009) Screening for Breast Cancer: Systematic Evidence Review Update for the US Preventive Services Task Force [Internet]. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US) Report No 10- 05142-EF-1. [www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK36392/]

  • Nyström L, Rutqvist LE, Wall S et al. (1993) Breast cancer screening with mammography: overview of Swedish randomised trials. Lancet 341 (8851): 973–978

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nyström L, Andersson I, Bjurstam N et al. (2002) Long-term effects of mammography screening: updated overview of the Swedish randomised trials. Lancet 359: 909

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O'Driscoll D, Warren R, MacKay J, Britton P, Day NE (2001) Screening with breast ultrasound in a population at moderate risk due to family history. J Med Screen 8: 106–109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Okonkwo QL, Draisma G, der Kinderen A et al. (2008) Breast cancer screening policies in developing countries: a cost-effectiveness analysis for India. J Natl Cancer Inst 100: 1290

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perry N, Broeders M, de Wolf C, Törnberg S, Holland R, von Karsa L (2006) European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis, 4th edn. [www.screening.iarc.fr/doc/ND7306954ENC_002.pdf; Zugriff Juli 2011]

  • Pharoah PD, Antoniou AC, Easton DF, Ponder BA (2008) Polygenes, risk prediction, and targeted prevention of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 358: 2796

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E et al.; Digital Mammographic Imaging Screening Trial (DMIST) Investigators Group (2005) Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breastcancer screening. N Engl J Med 353: 1773

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajkumar SV, Hartmann LC (1999) Screening mammography in women aged 40–49 years. Medicine (Baltimore) 78: 410

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ravdin PM, Cronin KA, Howlader N et al. (2007) The decrease in breast-cancer incidence in 2003 in the United States. N Engl J Med 356: 1670

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts MM, Alexander FE, Anderson TJ et al. (1990) Edinburgh trial of screening for breast cancer: mortality at seven years. Lancet 335: 241–246

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saslow D, Boetes C, Burke W et al. (2007) American Cancer Society guidelines for breast cancer screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin 57: 75

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scharl A (2010) Brustkrebsfrüherkennung nach dem 69. Lebensjahr. Geburtsh Frauenheilkd 70: 832–834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schonberg MA, Silliman RA, Marcantonio ER (2009) Weighing the benefits and burdens of mammography screening among women age 80 years or older. J Clin Oncol 27: 1774

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schopper D, de Wolf C (2009) How effective are breast cancer screening programmes by mammography? Review of the current evidence. Eur J Cancer 45: 1916

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro S, Venet W, Strax P, Venet L, Roeser R (1982) Ten- to fourteenyear effect of screening on breast cancer mortality. J Natl Cancer Inst 69: 349–355

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro S, Venet V, Strax P, Venet L, Roeser R (1985) Selection, followup and analysis in the Health Insurance Plan Study: a randomised trial with breast cancer screening. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 67: 65–74

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shen Y, Parmigiani G (2005) A model-based comparison of breast cancer screening strategies: mammograms and clinical breast examinations. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 14: 529–532

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Skaane P, Skjennald A (2004) Screen-film mammography vs. full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading: randomized trial in a population-based screening program – the Oslo II Study. Radiology 232: 197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tabàr L, Fagerberg G, Duffy SW, Day NE, Gad A, Gröntoft O (1992) Update of the Swedish two-county program of mammographic screening for breast cancer. Radiol Clin North Am 30 (1): 187– 210

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas DB, Gao DL, Ray RM, Wang WW, Allison CJ, Chen FL, Porter P, Hu YW, Zhao GL, Pan LD, Li W, Wu C, Coriaty Z, Evans I, Lin MG, Stalsberg H, Self SG (2002) Randomized trial of breast self-examination in Shanghai: final results. J Natl Cancer Inst 94: 1445– 1457

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thomssen C (2011) Level of Evidence (LoE), Grade of Recommendation (GR) und AGO-Empfehlungsgrade. In AGO Kommission Mamma (Hrsg) Aktuelle Empfehlungen zur Prävention, Diagnostik und Therapie primärer und fortgeschrittener Mammakarzinome – State of the Art 2011. München: Zuckschwerdt, S XVII

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Preventive Services Task Force – USPSTF (2009) Screening for Breast Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. Ann Intern Med 151: 716–726

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijck JA, Verbeek AL, Beex LV et al. (1996) Mammographic screening after the age of 65 years: Evidence for a reduction in breast cancer mortality. Int J Cancer 66: 727

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Schoor G, Moss SM, Otten JD, Donders R, Paap E, den Heeten GJ, Holland R, Broeders MJM, Verbeek ALM (2010) Effective biennial mammographic screening in women aged 40–49 years. Eur J Cancer 3137: 3140

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbeek AL, Hendriks JH, Holland R et al. (1984) Reduction of breast cancer mortality through mass screening with modern mammography. First results of the Nijmegen project, 1975–1981. Lancet i (8388): 1222–1224

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinnicombe S, Pinto Pereira SM, McCormack VA, Shiel S, Perry N, Dos Santos Silva IM (2009) Full-field digital vs. screen-film mammography: comparison within the UK breast screening program and systematic review of published data. Radiology 251: 347–358

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Walter LC, Covinsky KE (2001) Cancer screening in elderly patients. A framework for individualized decision making. JAMA 285: 2750

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Warner E, Plewes DB, Shumak RS et al. (2001) Comparison of breast magnetic resonance imaging, mammography, and ultrasound for surveillance of women at high risk for hereditary breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 19: 3524–3531

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Warner E, Messersmith H, Causer P, Eisen A, Shumak R, Plewes D (2008) Systematic review: using magnetic resonance imaging to screen women at high risk for breast cancer. Ann Intern Med 148: 671–679

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss NS (2003) Breast cancer mortality in relation to clinical breast examination and breast self-examination. Breast J 9 Suppl 2: 86–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welch HG, Woloshin S, Schwartz LM (2008) The sea of uncertainty surrounding ductal carcinoma in situ – the price of screening mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst 100: 228

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • White E, Velentgas P, Mandelson MT et al. (1998) Variation in mammographic breast density by time in menstrual cycle among women aged 40–49 years. J Natl Cancer Inst 90: 906

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zahl PH, Strand BH, Maehlen J (2004) Incidence of breast cancer in Norway and Sweden during introduction of nationwide screening: prospective cohort study. BMJ 328: 921

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zahl PH, Maehlen J, Welch HG (2008) The natural history of invasive breast cancers detected by screening mammography. Arch Intern Med 168: 2311

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ziv E, Shepherd J, Smith-Bindman R, Kerlikowske K (2003) Mammographic breast density and family history of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 95: 556

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Klinikum St. Marien, Lehrkrankenhaus der Universität Regensburg und der Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Frauenklinik, Mariahilfbergweg 5–7, 92224, Amberg

    Prof. Dr. med. U.-J. Göhring

  2. Johanniter-Krankenhaus Gynäkologisch-geburtshilfliche Abteilung, Evangelisches Klinikum Bonn gGmbH, Johanniterstraße 3–5, 53113, Bonn

    Prof. Dr. med. A. Scharl

Authors
  1. Prof. Dr. med. A. Scharl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Prof. Dr. med. U.-J. Göhring
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Johann-Wolfgang-Goethe-Universität Frankfurt, Universitätsfrauenklinik, Frankfurt

    Manfred Kaufmann

  2. Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg, Universitätsfrauenklinik, Magdeburg

    Serban D. Costa

  3. Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Klinikum St. Marien, Lehrkrankenhaus der Universität Regensburg, Erlangen-Nürnberg

    Anton Scharl

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Scharl, A., Göhring, UJ. (2013). Mammographiescreening. In: Kaufmann, M., Costa, S.D., Scharl, A. (eds) Die Gynäkologie. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20923-9_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20923-9_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-20922-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-20923-9

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation