Abstract
History, it seems, is often subject to the personal whim and caprice of just a few individuals. Indeed, in several countries, and sometimes on several occasions, crucial majority-vote decisions have been resolved on the basis of only one person’s vacillation. In some instances, the individual concerned was logrolling; occasionally, by means fair or foul, he – it was usually a he – was cajoled. Either way, the effect was that decisions were sometimes swung this way or that by the one who knew or cared least about the outcome. A few brief stories are worth re-telling, if only to show how frail is the polity of majoritarianism.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Governments very rarely perpetrate ‘the most extraordinary act of legislative suicide’ (Barrington 1843: 515) and vote for dependence. Apart from this Irish saga, one other incident comes to mind when, in 1940, the three Baltic States – Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania – voted to be absorbed into the Soviet Union. Stalin’s tanks were already on the streets.
References
Barrington Sir J (1843) The rise and fall of the Irish nation. James Duffy, Dublin
Deutscher I (1982) Stalin. Pelican, Harmondsworth
Fisk R (2001) Pity the nation. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Jordan AJ (2006) WT Cosgrave, founder of modern Ireland. Westport Books, Dublin
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Emerson, P. (2012). Won By One. In: Defining Democracy. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20904-8_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20904-8_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-20903-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-20904-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)