Skip to main content

Formation of Small Supernumerary Marker Chromosomes

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

In general, not much is known about the exact mode of small supernumerary marker chromosome (sSMC) formation. Especially, when, why, and how during gametogenesis or embryogenesis an sSMC evolves is unclear. Nonetheless, for all kinds of sSMC shapes there are models for how they could be formed. These ideas are based in part on the finding that uniparental disomy and sSMC can show up together and on the observation that sSMC can evolve by incomplete trisomic rescue. Overall, an sSMC is formed by the combination of one or more rare events happening during gametogenesis or embryogenesis. This chapter sumarizes what is known on the formation of multiple sSMC compared with single sSMC, on inverted duplicated, centric minute-shaped, and ring-shaped sSMC evolution, on the mixtures of different sSMC shapes, and on centromeric activity of dicentric sSMC and breakpoint characteristics of sSMC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Augui S, Filion GJ, Huart S, Nora E, Guggiari M, Maresca M, Stewart AF, Heard E (2007) Sensing X chromosome pairs before X inactivation via a novel X-pairing region of the Xic. Science 318:1632–1636

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin EL, May LF, Justice AN, Martin CL, Ledbetter DH (2008) Mechanisms and consequences of small supernumerary marker chromosomes: from Barbara McClintock to modern genetic-counseling issues. Am J Hum Genet 82:398–410

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bán Z, Nagy B, Papp C, Beke A, Tóth-Pál E, Papp Z (2003) Recurrent trisomy 21 and uniparental disomy 21 in a family. Fetal Diagn Ther 18:454–458

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bartels I, Schlueter G, Liehr T, von Eggeling F, Starke H, Glaubitz R, Burfeind P (2003) Supernumerary small marker chromosome (SMC) and uniparental disomy 22 in a child with confined placental mosaicism of trisomy 22: trisomy rescue due to marker chromosome formation. Cytogenet Genome Res 101:103–105

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beverstock GC, Bezrookove V, Mollevanger P, van de Kamp JJ, Pearson P, Kouwenberg JM, Rosenberg C (2003) Multiple supernumerary ring chromosomes of different origin in a patient: a clinical report and review of the literature. Am J Med Genet A 122:168–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter MT, St Pierre SA, Zackai EH, Emanuel BS, Boycott KM (2009) Phenotypic delineation of Emanuel syndrome (supernumerary derivative 22 syndrome): clinical features of 63 individuals. Am J Med Genet A 149:1712–1721

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel A, Malafiej P (2003) A series of supernumerary small ring marker autosomes identified by FISH with chromosome probe arrays and literature review excluding chromosome 15. Am J Med Genet A 117:212–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewald GW (1983) Isodicentric X chromosomes in humans: origin, segregation behaviour, and replication band patterns. In: Sandberg AA (ed) Cytogenetics of the mammalian X chromosome, part A. Liss, New York, pp 405–426

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewers E, Yoda K, Hamid AB, Weise A, Manvelyan M, Liehr T (2010) Centromere activity in dicentric small supernumerary marker chromosomes. Chromosome Res 18:555–562

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fang YY, Eyre HJ, Bohlander SK, Estop A, McPherson E, Trager T, Riess O, Callen DF (1995) Mechanisms of small ring formation suggested by the molecular characterization of two small accessory ring chromosomes derived from chromosome 4. Am J Hum Genet 57:1137–1142

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Farfalli VI, Magli MC, Ferraretti AP, Gianaroli L (2007) Role of aneuploidy on embryo implantation. Gynecol Obstet Invest 64:161–165

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Felka T, Lemke J, Lemke C, Michel S, Liehr T, Claussen U (2007) DNA degradation during maturation of erythrocytes: molecular cytogenetic characterization of Howell-Jolly bodies. Cytogenet Genome Res 119:2–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ing PS, Lubinsky MS, Smith SD, Golden E, Sanger WG, Duncan A (1987) Cat-eye syndrome with different marker chromosomes in a mother and daughter. Am J Med Genet A 26:621–628

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Iourov IY, Vorsanova SG, Yurov YB (2009) Developmental neural chromosome instability as a possible cause of childhood brain cancers. Med Hypotheses 72:615–616

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kalousek DK, Howard-Peebles PN, Olson SB, Barrett IJ, Dorfmann A, Black SH, Schulman JD, Wilson RD (1991) Confirmation of CVS mosaicism in term placentae and high frequency of intrauterine growth retardation association with confined placental mosaicism. Prenat Diagn 11:743–750

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liehr T (2006) Familial small supernumerary marker chromosomes are predominantly inherited via the maternal line. Genet Med 8:459–462

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liehr T (ed) (2009a) Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH): application guide. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Liehr T (2010) Cytogenetic contribution to uniparental disomy (UPD). Mol Cytogenet 3:8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liehr T, Pfeiffer RA, Trautmann U (1992) Typical and partial cat eye syndrome: identification of the marker chromosome by FISH. Clin Genet 42:91–96

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liehr T, Claussen U, Starke H (2004) Small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMC) in humans. Cytogenet Genome Res 107:55–67

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liehr T, Starke H, Heller A, Kosyakova N, Mrasek K, Gross M, Karst C, Steinhaeuser U, Hunstig F, Fickelscher I, Kuechler A, Trifonov V, Romanenko SA, Weise A (2006a) Multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) applied for FISH-banding. Cytogenet Genome Res 114:240–244

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liehr T, Mrasek K, Weise A, Dufke A, Rodríguez L, Martínez Guardia N, Sanchís A, Vermeesch JR, Ramel C, Polityko A, Haas OA, Anderson J, Claussen U, von Eggeling F, Starke H (2006b) Small supernumerary marker chromosomes: progress towards a genotype-phenotype correlation. Cytogenet Genome Res 112:23–34

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liehr T, Starke H, Senger G, Melotte C, Weise A, Vermeesch JR (2006c) Overrepresentation of small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMC) from chromosome 6 origin in cases with multiple sSMC. Am J Med Genet A 140:46–51

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liehr T, Utine GE, Trautmann U, Rauch A, Kuechler A, Pietrzak J, Bocian E, Kosyakova N, Mrasek K, Boduroglu K, Weise A, Aktas D (2007a) Neocentric small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMC): three more cases and review of the literature. Cytogenet Genome Res 118:31–37

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liehr T, Mrasek K, Hinreiner S, Reich D, Ewers E, Bartels I, Seidel J, Emmanuil N, Petesen M, Polityko A, Dufke A, Iourov I, Trifonov V, Vermeesch J, Weise A (2007b) Small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMC) in patients with a 45, X/46, X,+mar karyotype: 17 new cases and a review of the literature. Sex Dev 1:353–362

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Los FJ, van Opstal D, van den Berg C, Braat AP, Verhoef S, Wesby-van Swaay E, van den Ouweland AM, Halley DJ (1998) Uniparental disomy with and without confined placental mosaicism: a model for trisomic zygote rescue. Prenat Diagn 18:659–668

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Magenis RE, Sheehy RR, Brown MG, McDermid HE, White BN, Zonana J, Weleber R (1988) Parental origin of the extra chromosome in the cat eye syndrome: evidence from heteromorphism and in situ hybridization analysis. Am J Med Genet A 29:9–19

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mefford HC, Eichler EE (2009) Duplication hotspots, rare genomic disorders, and common disease. Curr Opin Genet Dev 19:196–204

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Michalski K, Rauer M, Williamson N, Perszyk A, Hoo JJ (1993) Identification, counselling, and outcome of two cases of prenatally diagnosed supernumerary small ring chromosomes. Am J Med Genet A 46:88–94

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Migeon BR, Jeppesen P, Torchia BS, Fu S, Dunn MA, Axelman J, Schmeckpeper BJ, Fantes J, Zori RT, Driscoll DJ (1996) Lack of X inactivation associated with maternal X isodisomy: evidence for a counting mechanism prior to X inactivation during human embryogenesis. Am J Hum Genet 58:161–170

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mrasek K, Schoder C, Teichmann AC, Behr K, Franze B, Wilhelm K, Blaurock N, Claussen U, Liehr T, Weise A (2010) Global screening and extended nomenclature for 230 aphidicolin-inducible fragile sites, including 61 yet unreported ones. Int J Oncol 36:929–940

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee AB, Murty VV, Rodriguez E, Reuter VE, Bosl GJ, Chaganti RS (1991) Detection and analysis of origin of i(12p), a diagnostic marker of human male germ cell tumors, by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 3:300–307

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murmann AE, Conrad DF, Mashek H, Curtis CA, Nicolae RI, Ober C, Schwartz S (2009) Inverted duplications on acentric markers: mechanism of formation. Hum Mol Genet 18:2241–2256

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Narahara K, Hiramoto K, Murakami M, Miyake S, Tsuji K, Yokoyama Y, Namba H, Ninomiya S, Murakami R, Seino Y (1992) Unique karyotypes in two patients with Prader-Willi syndrome. Am J Med Genet A 42:671–677

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez-Duenas ML, Gonzalez GJ (1992) fra(1)(p11), fra(1)(q22) and r(1)(p11q22) in a retarded girl. Ann Genet 35:178–182

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schreck RR, Breg WR, Erlanger BF, Miller OJ (1977) Preferential derivation of abnormal human G-group-like chromosomes from chromosome 15. Hum Genet 36:1–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sheth F, Ewers E, Kosyakova N, Weise A, Sheth J, Patil S, Ziegler M, Liehr T (2009) A neocentric isochromosome Yp present as additional small supernumerary marker chromosome: evidence against U-type exchange mechanism? Cytogenet Genome Res 125:115–116

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stankiewicz P, Brozek I, Helias-Rodzewicz Z, Wierzba J, Pilch J, Bocian E, Balcerska A, Wozniak A, Kardas I, Wirth J, Mazurczak T, Limon J (2001) Clinical and molecular-cytogenetic studies in seven patients with ring chromosome 18. Am J Med Genet A 101:226–239

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Starke H, Mitulla B, Beensen V, Trifonov V, Rubtsov N, Heller A, Ziegler M, Neumann A, Claussen U, Liehr T (2003) First postnatal case of mosaic del(22)/r(22). Prenat Diagn 23:765–767

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stavropoulou C, Mignon C, Delobel B, Moncla A, Depetris D, Croquette MF, Mattei MG (1998) Severe phenotype resulting from an active ring X chromosome in a female with a complex karyotype: characterisation and replication study. J Med Genet 35:932–938

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stefanou EG, Crocker M (2004) A chromosome 21-derived minute marker in a mosaic trisomy 21 background: implications for risk assessments in marker chromosome cases. Am J Med Genet A 127:191–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan BA, Willard HF (1998) Stable dicentric X chromosomes with two functional centromeres. Nat Genet 20:227–228

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Trifonov V, Fluri S, Binkert F, Nandini A, Anderson J, Rodriguez L, Gross M, Kosyakova N, Mkrtchyan H, Ewers E, Reich D, Weise A, Liehr T (2008) Complex rearranged small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMC), three new cases; evidence for an underestimated entity? Mol Cytogenet 1:6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vialard F, Molina-Gomes D, Quarello E, Leroy B, Ville Y, Selva J (2009) Partial chromosome deletion: a new trisomy rescue mechanism? Fetal Diagn Ther 25:111–114

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang NJ, Parokonny AS, Thatcher KN, Driscoll J, Malone BM, Dorrani N, Sigman M, LaSalle JM, Schanen NC (2008) Multiple forms of atypical rearrangements generating supernumerary derivative chromosome 15. BMC Genet 9:2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wu TF, Chu DS (2008) Epigenetic processes implemented during spermatogenesis distinguish the paternal pronucleus in the embryo. Reprod Biomed Online 16:13–22

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang F, Gu W, Hurles ME, Lupski JR (2009) Copy number variation in human health, disease, and evolution. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 10:451–481

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Liehr .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Liehr, T. (2012). Formation of Small Supernumerary Marker Chromosomes. In: Small Supernumerary Marker Chromosomes (sSMC). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20766-2_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics