Advertisement

Combinatorial Optimization for Weighing Matrices with the Ordering Messy Genetic Algorithm

  • Christos Koukouvinos
  • Dimitris E. Simos
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6630)

Abstract

In this paper, we demonstrate that the search for weighing matrices constructed from two circulants can be viewed as a permutation problem. To solve it a set of two competent genetic algorithms (CGAs) are used to locate common integers in two sorted arrays. The motivation to deal with the messy genetic algorithm (mGA) is given from the pioneering results of Goldberg, regarding the ability of the mGA to put tight genes together in a solution which points directly to structural patterns in weighing matrices. In order to take into advantage a recent formalism on the support of two sequences with zero autocorrelation we use an adaptation of the ordering messy GA (OmeGA) where we combine the fast mGA with random keys to represent permutations of the two sequences under investigation. This transformation of the weighing matrices problem to an instance of a combinatorial optimization problem seems to be promising since we illustrate that our framework is capable to solve open cases for weighing matrices as these are listed in the second edition of the Handbook of Combinatorial Designs.

Keywords

Weighing matrices messy genetic algorithm ordering messy genetic algorithm competent metaheuristics optimization 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bean, J.C.: Genetic algorithms and random keys for sequencing and optimization. ORSA J. on Computing 6, 154–160 (1994)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    van Dam, W.: Quantum algorithms for weighing matrices and quadratic residues. Algorithmica 34, 413–428 (2002)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fenimore, E., Cannon, T.: Coded aperture imaging with uniformly redundant array. Appl. Optics 17, 337–347 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Geramita, A.V., Seberry, J.: Orthogonal Designs. Quadratic Forms and Hadamard Matrices. Lecture Notes in Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 45. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York (1979)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Golomb, S., Taylor, H.: Two-dimensional synchronization patterns for minimum ambiguity. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 28, 600–604 (1982)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Goldberg, D.E., Deb, K., Korb, B.: Messy genetic algorithms: Motivation, analysis, and first results. Complex Systems 5, 493–530 (1989)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Goldberg, D.E., Deb, K., Korb, B.: Messy genetic algorithms revisited: Studies in mixed size and scale. Complex Systems 4, 415–444 (1990)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Goldberg, D.E., Deb, K., Kargupta, H., Harik, G.: Rapid, Accurate Optimization of Difficult Problems Using Fast Messy Genetic Algorithms. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, pp. 56–64. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco (1993)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Goncalves, J.F., Resende, M.G.C.: Biased random-key genetic algorithms for combinatorial optimization (to appear in Journal of Heuristics)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hersheya, J., Yarlagadda, R.: Two-dimensional synchronisation. Electron. Lett. 19, 801–803 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Holland, J.H.: Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems. An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control and Artificial Intelligence. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor (1975)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    De Jong, K.A.: An Analysis of the Behavior of a Class of Genetic Adaptive Systems. Doctoral Thesis, CCS Department. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI (1975)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kargupta, H., Deb, K., Goldberg, D.E.: Ordering Genetic Algorithms and Deception. In: Männer, R., Manderick, B. (eds.) Parallel Problem Solving from Nature PPSN II, pp. 47–56. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. (1992)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Knjazew, D.: OmeGA: A Competent Genetic Algorithm for Solving Permutation and Scheduling Problems. Kluwer, Norwell (2002)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kotsireas, I.S., Koukouvinos, C., Seberry, J.: Weighing matrices and string sorting. Annals of Combinatorics 13, 305–313 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kotsireas, I.S., Koukouvinos, C., Pardalos, P.M.: An efficient string sorting algorithm for weighing matrices of small weight. Optimization Letters 4, 29–36 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kotsireas, I.S., Koukouvinos, C., Pardalos, P.M.: A modified power spectral density test applied to weighing matrices with small weight (to appear in J. Comb. Optim.)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kotsireas, I.S., Koukouvinos, C., Pardalos, P.M., Simos, D.E.: Competent genetic algorithms for weighing matrices (submitted for publication)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kotsireas, I.S., Koukouvinos, C., Pardalos, P.M., Shylo, O.: Periodic complementary binary sequences and combinatorial optimization algorithms. J. Comb. Optim. 20, 63–75 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kharaghani, H., Koukouvinos, C.: Complementary, Base and Turyn Sequences. In: Colbourn, C.J., Dinitz, J.H. (eds.) Handbook of Combinatorial Designs, 2nd edn., pp. 317–321. Chapman and Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla (2006)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Knuth, D.E.: The Art of Computer Programming, 3rd edn. Seminumerical Algorithms of Addison- Wesley Series in Computer Science and Information Processing, vol. 2. Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Mass. (1998)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Koukouvinos, C.: Sequences with Zero Autocorrelation. In: Colbourn, C.J., Dinitz, J.H. (eds.) The CRC Handbook of Combinatorial Designs, pp. 452–456. CRC Press, Boca Raton (1996)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Koukouvinos, C., Seberry, J.: Weighing matrices and their applications. J. Statist. Plann. Inference 62, 91–101 (1997)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Koukouvinos, C., Seberry, J.: New weighing matrices and orthogonal designs constructed using two sequences with zero autocorrelation function - a review. J. Statist. Plann. Inference 81, 153–182 (1999)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Koukouvinos, C., Simos, D.E.: On the computation of the non-periodic autocorrelation function of two ternary sequences and its related complexity analysis (to appear in J. Appl. Math. & Informatics)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pardalos, P.M., Du, D.-Z. (eds.): Handbook of Combinatorial Optimization. Combinatorial Optimization, vol. 2. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Springer Netherlands (1998)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pardalos, P.M., Resende, M.G.C. (eds.): Handbook of Applied Optimization. Oxford University Press, Inc., 198 Madison Avenue, USA (2002)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rothlauf, F.: Representations for Genetic and Evolutionary Algorithms, 2nd edn. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg (2006)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Seberry, J., Yamada, M.: Hadamard Matrices, Sequences and Block Designs. In: Dinitz, J.H., Stinson, D.R. (eds.) Contemporary Design Theory: A Collection of Surveys, pp. 431–560. John Wiley & Sons, New York (1992)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Weathers, G., Holiday, E.M.: Group-complementary array coding for radar clutter rejection. IEEE Transaction on Aerospace and Electronic Systems 19, 369–379 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wallis, J.S.: On supplementary difference sets. Aequationes Math. 8, 242–257 (1972)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christos Koukouvinos
    • 1
  • Dimitris E. Simos
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of MathematicsNational Technical University of AthensAthensGreece

Personalised recommendations