Abstract
Systematic reviews are used to filter conclusive, reproducible information – usually concerning the effectiveness of medical interventions – from the overwhelming quantity of individual study results. For this purpose research results are systematically collected, evaluated and summarized. They differ from traditional reviews and expert commentaries in that they have a scientific, transparent and reproducible approach which tries to minimize the risk of bias. Systematic reviews are not so much about reflecting expert opinions; rather, they seek to establish a balanced and neutral reproduction and analysis of the evidence available.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Barnes J, Resch K-L, Ernst E (1997) Homeopathy for postoperative ileus? (A meta-analysis). J Clin Gastroenterol 25:628–633
Bauer CM, Weight L, Lambert MI (2002) The use of Arnica for the treatment of soft-tissue damage. S Afr J Physiother 58:34–40
Boissel JP, Cucherat M, Haugh M, Gauthier E (1996) Critical literature review on the effectiveness of homeopathy: overview of data from homeopathic medicine trials. In: Homeopathic Medicine Research Group. Report to the Commission of the European Union Communities, pp 196–210
Bol A (1998) Neue Meta-Analyse zu randomisierten, kontrollierten Studien in der Homöopathie: die klinische Wirksamkeit der Homöopathie ist mehr als ein Placeboeffekt. Homint R&D Newslett 1:10–3
Coll L (2001) Homeopathy in survivors of childhood sexual abuse. Homeopathy 91:3–9
Cucherat M, Haugh MC, Gooch M, Boissel JP (2000) Evidence of clinical efficacy of homeopathy. (A meta-analysis of clinical trials). Eur J Clin Pharmacol 56:27–33
Dantas F, Rampes H (2000) Do homeopathic medicines provoke adverse effects? A systematic review. Br Homeopathic J 89:35–38
Dean M (1998) Out of step with the Lancet homeopathy meta-analysis: more objections than objectivity? J Altern Complement Med 4:389–298
Demarque D (1987) The development of proving methods since Hahnemann. Br Homeopathic J 76:271–275
Ernst E (1998) Are highly dilute homeopathic remedies placebos? Perfusion 11:291–292
Ernst E (1999a) Homeopathic prophylaxis of headaches and migraine? A systematic review. J Pain Symptom Manage 18:353–357
Ernst E (1999b) Classical homeopathy versus conventional treatments: a systematic review. Perfusion 12: 13–15
Ernst E (2000) The usage of complementary therapies by dermatological patients: a systematic review. Br J Dermatol 142:857–861
Ernst E (2002) A systematic review of systematic reviews of homeopathy. Br J Clin Pharmacol 54:577–582
Ernst E, Barnes J (1998) Are homeopathic remedies effective for delayed-onset muscle soreness? A systematic review of placebo-controlled trials. Perfusion 11:4–8
Ernst E, Pittler MH (1998) Efficacy of homeopathic Arnica; a systematic review of placebo-controlled clinical trials. Arch Surg 133:1187–1190
Ernst E, Pittler MH (2000) Re-analysis of previous meta-analysis of clinical trials of homeopathy (letter to the editors). J Clin Epidemiol 53:1188
Ernst E, Resch KL (1996) Clinical trials of homeopathy: a re-Analysis of a published review. Forschende Komplementärmedizin 3:85–90
Fisher P (1999) Delayed onset muscle soreness in long-distance runners. J Altern Complement Med 5:119
Glanville J, Sowden A (2001) Identification of the need for a review. In: Khan K, ter Riet G, Glanville J, Sowden A, Kleijnen J (eds). Undertaking Systematic Reviews of Research on Effectiveness. CRD Report Number 4 (2nd edn) York
Grabia S, Ernst E (2003) Homeopathic aggravations: a systematic review of randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials. Homeopathy 92:92–98
Haidvogl M, Lehner E (1993) Homeopathic treatment of handicapped children: review of a series of 40 cases. Br Homeopathic J 82:227–236
Halter K, Righetti M (1998) Klassische Homöopathie (Teile 1–3) – Zum Nachweis von Wirksamkeit und Nutzen einer komplementärmedizinischen Methode. Schweiz Z GanzheitsMed 10:252–257, 343–346 and (1999) 11:1
Hill C, Doyon F (1990) Review of randomized trials of homeopathy. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique 38:139–148
Jacobs J (2002) Homeopathic research: fact or fantasy? (A review of the evidence). Am J Homeopathic Med 95:26–32
Jacobs J, Jonas WB, Jimenez-Perez M, Crothers D (2003) Homeopathy for childhood diarrhea: combined results and meta-analysis from three randomized, controlled clinical trials. Pediatr Infect Dis J 22:229–234
Jacobs JWG, Rasker JJ, van Riel PLCM, Gribnau FWJ, van de Putte LBA (1991) Alternatieve behandelingswijzen bij reumatische aandoeningen; een literatuuronderzoek. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 135:317–322
Jonas WB, Anderson RL, Drawford DD, Lyons JS (2001) A systematic review of the quality of homeopathic clinical trials. BMC Complement Altern Med 1:1–12
Jonas WB, Kaptchuk Ted J, Linde K (2003) A critical overview of homeopathy. Ann Intern Med 138:393–399
Jonas WB, Linde K, Rampes H (2000) Homeopathy and rheumatic disease. Complement Altern Ther 26:117–123
Khan MT (2000) Clinical application of homeopathic podiatry as used at The Royal London Homeopathic Hospital (RLHH). Br Homeopathic J 89 [Suppl 1]:S 53
Kleijnen J, Knipschild P, ter Riet G (1991) Clinical trials of homeopathy. BMJ 302:316–323
Linde K (1999) Are there proven therapies in homeopathy? [in German]. Internist (Berl) 40:1271–1274
Linde K, Clausius N, Ramirez G, Melchart D, Eitel F, Hedges LV, Jonas WB (1997) Are the clinical effects of homeopathy placebo effects? A meta-analysis of placebo-controlled trials. Lancet 350:834–843
Linde K, Clausius N, Ramirez G, Melchart D, Eitel F, Hedges LV, Jonas WB (1998) Overviews and meta-analyses of controlled clinical trials of homeopathy: in: Ernst E, Hahn EG (eds) Homeopathy. A critical appraisal. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, pp 101–106
Linde K, Hondras M, Vickers A, ter Riet G, Melchart D (2001) Systematic reviews of complementary therapies – an annotated bibliography. Part 3: Homeopathy. BMC Complement Alternat Med 1:4. doi:10.1186/1472-6882-1-4
Linde K, Jobst K (2000) Homeopathy for asthma. The Cochrane Library (2). CD000353
Linde K, Jonas WB, Melchart D, Worku F, Wagner H, Eitel F (1994) Critical review and meta-analysis of serial agitated dilutions in experimental toxicology. Hum Exp Toxicol 13:481–492
Linde K, Melchart D (1998) Randomized controlled trials of individualized homeopathy: a state-of-the-art review. J Altern Complement Med 4:371–188
Linde K, Scholz M, Ramirez G, Clausius N, Melchart D, Jonas WB (1999) Impact of study quality on outcome in placebo-controlled trials of homeopathy. J Clin Epidemiol 52:631–636
Linde K, Willich SN (2003) How objective are systematic reviews? Differences between reviews on complementary medicine. J R Soc Med 96:17–22
Long LEE (2001) Homeopathic remedies for the treatment of osteoarthritis: a systematic review. Br Homeopathic J 90:37–43
Lüdtke R, Bock E (1995)Medikamentenprüfungen in der Praxis niedergelassener Ärzte – Die Auswertung verschiedener Studien. Institut für Medizinische Informationsverarbeitung der Universität Tübingen
Lüdtke R, Wilkens J (1999) Klinische Wirksamkeitsstudien zu Arnica in homöopathischen Zubereitungen. In: Albrecht H, Frühwald M (eds) Jahrbuch der Karl und Veronica Carstens-Stiftung, vol 5. KVC-Verlag, Essen, pp 97–112
Lüdtke R (2002) Statistical comments on a re-analysis of a previous meta-analysis of homeopathic RCTs. J Clin Epidemiol 55:103–104
Lüdtke R, Wiesenauer M (1997) Eine Metaanalyse der homöopathischen Behandlung der Pollinosis mit Galphimia glauca. Wien Med Wochenschr 147:323–327
Lutz, C (1993) Quantitative Meta-Analyse empirischer Ergebnisse der Homöopathieforschung. Diplomarbeit, Psychologisches Institut, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität, Freiburg
McCarney R, Warner J, Fisher P, van Haselen R (2003) Homeopathy for dementia. The Cochrane Library (2) CD003803
Morrison B, Lilford RJ, Ernst E (2000) Methodological rigour and results of clinical trials of homeopathic remedies. Perfusion 13:132–138
O’Meara S, Wilson P, Bridle C, Kleijnen J (2003) Effectiveness of homeopathy: a systematic review of systematic reviews. Quality Safety Health 11:189–194
Poitevin B (1988) Evaluation de l`homeopathe, axes generaux. Homeopathie française 76:93
Righetti M (1988) Forschung in der Homöopathie. Grundlagen, Problematik und Ergebnisse. Burgdorf, Göttingen
Righetti M (1999) Homöopathie: Grundlagen, Anwendungsgebiete und mögliche Ansätze zu Forschungsstudien. available at: http://www.homeodoctor.ch/Righetti.htm
Scheen AJ (1997) L’homéopathie peut-elle trouver sa légitimité dans les résultats “positifs” d’une méta-analyse? Rev Med Liege 52:694–697
Scofield AM (1984) Experimental research in homeopathy – a critical review. Br Homeopathic J 73:161–180 and 211–226
Smith CA (2001) Homeopathy for induction of labour. The Cochrane Library 4:1–11
Taylor MA, Reilly D, Llewellyn-Jones RH, McSharry Ch, Aitchison TC (2000) Randomized controlled trial of homeopathy versus placebo in perennial allergic rhinitis with overview of four trial series. BMJ 321:471–476
Tveiten D, Bruset S (2003) Effect of Arnica D30 in marathon runners. Pooled results from two double-blind placebo controlled studies. Homeopathy 92:187–189
van Wassenhoven M (2002) Meta-analyse des travaux recents en clinique homeopathique. (Revue Belge D`Homeopathie). available at: http://www.entretiens-internationaux.mc/wwfdeux.htm
Vickers A, Smith CA (2000) Homeopathic Oscillococcinum for preventing and treating influenza and influenzalike syndromes. The Cochrane Library (1):CD001957
Walach H (1997)Unspezifische Therapie-Effekte – Das Beispiel Homöopathie. Habilitationsschrift Psychologisches Institut, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg
Walach H (1992) Wissenschaftliche homöopathische Arzneimittelprüfung. Doppelblinde Crossover-Studie einer homöopathischen Hochpotenz gegen Placebo. Haug, Heidelberg
Wein C (2002) Qualitätsaspekte klinischer Studien zur Homöopathie. KVC-Verlag, Essen
Wiesenauer M, Lüdtke R (1996) A meta-analysis of the homeopathic treatment of pollinosis with Galphimia glauca. Forschende Komplementärmedizin 3:230–234
Witt C, Müller E, Linde K, Willich SN (2000) Homeopathic treatment of human infertility – an overview. Reprod Domestic Animals 35:17
Ziment I, Tashkin DP (2000) Alternative medicine for allergy and asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol 106:603–614
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bornhöft, G., von Ammon, K. (2011). Overview of Systematic Reviews on the Clinical Efficacy of Homeopathy. In: Bornhöft, G., Matthiessen, P.F. (eds) Homeopathy in Healthcare – Effectiveness, Appropriateness, Safety, Costs. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20638-2_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20638-2_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-20637-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-20638-2
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)