Skip to main content

Inductive Design of Maturity Models: Applying the Rasch Algorithm for Design Science Research

  • Conference paper
Service-Oriented Perspectives in Design Science Research (DESRIST 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 6629))

Abstract

Maturity models are an established means to systematically document and guide the development of organizations using archetypal capability levels. Often, these models lack a sound foundation and/or are derived on the basis of an arbitrary design method. In order to foster the design of relevant and rigorous artifacts, this paper presents a method for maturity model construction that applies the Rasch algorithm and cluster analysis as a sound methodical foundation. The Rasch algorithm is widely used to improve scholarly intelligence and attainment tests. In order to demonstrate the application of the proposed method and to evaluate its usability and applicability, we present a design exemplar in the business intelligence domain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Paulk, M.C., Curtis, B., Chrissis, M.B., Weber, C.V.: Capability Maturity Model, Version 1.1. IEEE Software 10, 18–27 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ahern, D.M., Clouse, A., Turner, R.: CMMI Distilled: A Practical Introduction to Integrated Process Improvement. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hakes, C.: The corporate self assessment handbook. Chapman & Hall, London (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fraser, P., Moultrie, J., Gregory, M.: The Use of Maturity Models/Grids as a Tool in Assessing Product Development Capability. In: IEEE International Engineering Management Conference (IEMC 2002), Cambridge, UK (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Crosby, P.B.: Quality Is Free - The Art of Making Quality Certain. McGraw-Hill, New York (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gibson, C.F., Nolan, R.L.: Managing the four stages of EDP growth. Harvard Business Review 52, 76–88 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pries-Heje, J., Baskerville, R.L.: Management design theories. In: Pries-Heje, J., Venable, J., Bunker, D., Russo, N.L., DeGross, J.I. (eds.) IFIP WG. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol. 318, pp. 263–281. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Becker, J., Niehaves, B., Pöppelbuss, J., Simons, A.: Maturity Models in IS Research. In: 18th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2010), Pretoria, South Africa (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mettler, T., Rohner, P., Winter, R.: Towards a Classification of Maturity Models in Information Systems. In: 6th Conference of the Italian Chapter of AIS, Costa Smeralda, Italy (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pfeffer, J., Sutton, R.: Knowing “What” To do is not enough: Turning knowledge into action. California Management Review 42, 83–108 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lahrmann, G., Marx, F., Winter, R., Wortmann, F.: Business Intelligence Maturity Models: An Overview. In: VII Conference of the Italian Chapter of AIS (itAIS 2010), Naples, Italy (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Biberoglu, E., Haddad, H.: A Survey of Industrial Experiences with CMM and the Teaching of CMM Practices. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges 18, 143–152 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Winter, R.: Design Science Research in Europe. European Journal of Information Systems 17, 470–475 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M.A., Chatterjee, S.: A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research. JMIS 24, 45–77 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design Science in Information Systems Research. MIS Quarterly 28, 75–105 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Simpson, J.A., Weiner, E.S.C.: The Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rosemann, M., De Bruin, T.: Towards a Business Process Management Maturity Model. In: 13th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2005), Regensburg, Germany (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Becker, J., Knackstedt, R., Pöppelbuß, J.: Developing Maturity Models for IT Management - A Procedure Model and its Application. Business & Information Systems Engineering 1, 213–222 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mettler, T., Rohner, P.: Situational Maturity Models as Instrumental Artifacts for Organizational Design. In: 4th International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology, Philadelphia, USA (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  20. de Bruin, T., Rosemann, M., Freeze, R., Kulkarni, U.: Understanding the Main Phases of Developing a Maturity Assessment Model. In: 16th Australasian Conference on Information Systems (ACIS 2005), Sydney, Australia (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  21. van Steenbergen, M., Bos, R., Brinkkemper, S., van de Weerd, I., Bekkers, W.: The design of focus area maturity models. In: Winter, R., Zhao, J.L., Aier, S. (eds.) DESRIST 2010. LNCS, vol. 6105, pp. 317–332. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Mettler, T.: Supply Management im Krankenhaus: Konstruktion und Evaluation eines konfigurierbaren Reifegradmodells zur zielgerichteten Gestaltung. Sierke, Göttingen (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Utterback, J.M., Abernathy, W.J.: A dynamic model of process and product innovation. Omega 3, 639–656 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hayes, W., Zubrow, D.: Moving on up: data and experience doing CMM-based software process improvement (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  25. vom Brocke, J.: Design Principles for Reference Modeling - Reusing Information Models by Means of Aggregation, Specialization, Instantiation, and Analogy. In: Fettke, P., Loos, P. (eds.) Reference Modeling for Business Systems Analysis, pp. 47–75. Idea Group, Hershey (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Maier, A.M., Moultrie, J., Clarkson, P.J.: Developing maturity grids for assessing organisational capabilities: Practitioner guidance. Engineering Design Centre, Engineering Department, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Järvinen, P.: On Reviewing of Results in Design Research. In: 15th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2007), St. Gallen, Switzerland (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Rönkkö, M., Järvi, A., Mäkelä, M.M.: Measuring and Comparing the Adoption of Software Practises in the Software Product Industry. In: Wang, Q., Pfahl, D., Raffo, D.M. (eds.) ICSP 2008. LNCS, vol. 5007, pp. 407–419. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. Dekleva, S., Drehmer, D.: Measuring Software Engineering Evolution: A Rasch Calibration. Information Systems Research 8, 95–104 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Bond, T.G., Fox, C.M.: Applying the Rasch Model. Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences. Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Mahwah (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rasch, G.: Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Linacre, J.M., Wright, B.D.: Bigsteps Rasch Software, Version 2.82 (1998), http://www.winsteps.com/bigsteps.htm

  33. Bühner, M.: Einführung in die Test- und Fragebogenkonstruktion. Pearson Studium, München (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Fischer, G.H., Molenaar, I.W.: Rasch Models: Foundations, Recent Developments, and Applications. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Likert, R.: A Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes. Archives of Psychology 140, 1–55 (1932)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Samuelson, P.A.: Foundations of Economic Analysis, Enlarged Edition. Harvard University Press, Harvard (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Gordon, A.D.: Hierarchical Classification. In: Arabie, P., Hubert, L.J., De Soete, G. (eds.) Clustering and Classification, pp. 65–121. World Scientific Publishing, River Edge (1996)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  38. Härdle, W., Simar, L.: Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis. Springer, Berlin (2003)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Winter, R., Fischer, R.: Essential Layers, Artifacts, and Dependencies of Enterprise Architecture. Journal of Enterprise Architecture 3, 7–18 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Paech, B., Kerkow, D.: Non-Functional Requirements Engineering - Quality is Essential. In: Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality, REFSQ, Essen, Riga, pp. 27–40 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Watson, H.J., Ariyachandra, T., Matyska, R.J.: Data warehousing stages of growth. Information Systems Management 18, 42–50 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. TDWI: 2008 TDWI BI Benchmark Report - Organizational and Performance Metrics for BI Teams. TDWI, Renton (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lahrmann, G., Marx, F., Mettler, T., Winter, R., Wortmann, F. (2011). Inductive Design of Maturity Models: Applying the Rasch Algorithm for Design Science Research. In: Jain, H., Sinha, A.P., Vitharana, P. (eds) Service-Oriented Perspectives in Design Science Research. DESRIST 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6629. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20633-7_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20633-7_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-20632-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-20633-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics