Skip to main content

The Barriers to Academic Engagement with Enterprise: A Social Scientist’s Perspective

  • Conference paper
Innovation through Knowledge Transfer 2010

Part of the book series: Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies ((SIST,volume 9))

Abstract

This paper explores the barriers to academic engagement with enterprise from a social scientist’s perspective and in relation to United Kingdom post- 1994 universities in particular, expanding key themes from previous literature to consider both progress and the limiting factors which still face university managers in their attempts to implement their ‘change’ agendas.

The current strategy of re-orienting and branding universities as professional, managerial and efficient organisations, within which knowledge must be generated in a deliverable and transferable form to external recipients, is unpopular with many social science and humanities academics in particular, owing to the prevailing view among the latter that their identity is under threat. Hence the apparently widespread academic disengagement discussed in this article, which is explored in the context of the reluctant academic pressured to extend their role into often unfamiliar business-speak, commercial enterprise and industrial environments by a university strategy that assumes all academics are capable of incorporating academic enterprise into their day to day activities. The paper concludes that for universities to successfully rebrand as professional and commercially successful institutions they must adopt a more business like approach requiring first that they overcome the fear prevalent among many UK social scientist academics, at least, that their managers, and the higher education sector at large, have shed essential values which, since Humboldt’s time, have underpinned the very purpose of higher education institutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Berman, J.: Connecting with industry: bridging the divide. J. High. Educ. Pol. Manag. 30, 165–174 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Boden, R., Deem, R., et al. (eds.): Geographies of knowledge, geometries of power: higher education in the twenty-first Century. Routledge, London (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Davenport, T.H., Prusak, L.: Working knowledge: how organisations manage what they know, Boston (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Delanty, G.: Challenging knowledge: the university in the knowledge society, OUP (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Department of business, industry and society. White paper: Higher ambitions: the future of universities in the knowledge economy (November 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. D’Este, P., Patel, P.: University-industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry? Res. Pol. 36, 1295–1313 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Etzkowitz, H., Leydesdorff, L.: The dynamics of innovation: from national systems + “mode 2” to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Res. Pol. 20, 109–123 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Etzkowitz, H., de Mello, J.M.C.: The rise of a triple helix culture. Int. J. of Tech. Manag. and Sustable Devt. 2(3), 159–171 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C., Cantasino Terra, B.R.: The future of the university and the university of the future: Evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Res. Pol. 29, 313–330 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Findlow, S.: Accountability and innovation in higher education: a disabling tension? Stds. in High. Educ. 33(3), 313–329 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Francis-Smythe, J.: Enhancing academic engagement in knowledge transfer activity in the UK. Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education 12(3), 68–72 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Francis-Smythe, J., Haase, S., et al.: Competencies for academics in knowledge transfer activity. In: Proceedings of the British Psychological Society, 2007 Occupational Psychotherapy Conference, Bristol, England (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Geuna, A., Muscio, A.: The governance of university knowledge transfer: a critical review of the literature, vol. 47, pp. 93–114. Springer Sciences Business Media, Heidelberg (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Grant, R.M.: Contemporary strategy analysis. Blackwell Publishers, Malden (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hall, R.M.: The management of intellectual assets. Journal of General Management 15, 53–68 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hannon, A., Silver, H.: Innovating in higher education: teaching, learning and institutional cultures. Studies in higher education. Open university press, Buckingham (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hardill, I., Baines, S.: Personal reflections on knowledge transfer and changing UK research priorities. Journal of the Academy of the Social Sciences 4(1), 83–96 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hatakenaka, S.: Development of third stream activity. Lessons from international experience. Higher education policy institute, Higher education funding council for England (November 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Higher education funding council for England 2009, Report on third stream funding (2009), http://www.hefce.co.uk/reports/2009 (accessed)

  20. H.M. Government 2003. The future of higher education. Government white paper

    Google Scholar 

  21. H.M. Government 2004. Science and innovation investment framework: 2004-2014. H.M. Treasury (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  22. H.M Government 2006 Science & innovation investment framework 2004-2014. H.M . Treasury (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  23. H.M Government 2009 Department of Business, Innovation and Skills white paper: Higher ambitions: the future of universities in the knowledge economy (November 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Jacobson, N.: Social epistemology: theory for the “fourth wave” of knowledge transfer and exchange research. Science Communication 29(1), 116–126 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Knowledge transfer partnerships/Technology strategy board. Application form, Part A (July 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lam, A.: Embedded firms, embedded knowledge: Problems of collaboration and knowledge transfer in global cooperative ventures. Organisation Studies 18(6), 973–996 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Laredo, P.: Revisiting the third mission of universities: towards a renewed categorisation of university activities? Higher Education Policy 20(4), 441–456 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Litan, R.E., Mitchell, L., Reedy, E.J.: Commercialising university innovations: alternative approaches. Social Sciences Research Network (2007), http://ssrn.com/abstract=976005 (accessed)

  29. Macfarlane, B.: The disengaged academic: the retreat from citizenship. Higher Education Quarterly 59(4), 296–312 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Manchester Metropolitan University, The vision for the future. Published at Manchester Metropolitan University website (2009), http://www.mmu.ac.uk/about/vision/

  31. Marley, L.: Quality and power in higher education. Oxford University Press, Maidenhead (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Meyer, M.: Academic entrepreneurs or entrepreneurial academics? Research based ventures and public support mechanisms. Research and Development Management 33, 107–115 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Milne, P., McCormack, C. (2004) Academic autonomy in a climate of change. A Paper Presented at the Society for Research into Higher Education (SRHE), Bristol (December 2004), http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/ (accessed)

  34. Nedeva, M.: New tricks and old dogs? The third mission and the reproduction of the university. In: Boden, R., Deem, R., et al. (eds.) Geographies of Knowledge, Geometries of Power: Higher Education in the Twenty-First Century. Routledge, London (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Nedeva, M., Boden, R.: Dante’s third circle? Shaping the meaning, practice and consequences of the third mission. In: 2007 Conference Proceedings Society for Research into Higher Education, SRHE (2007), http://www.srhe.ac.uk/conference2007 (accessed)

  36. Osbaldeston, M.: ’Global partnerships’ paper. In: ABS Conference, Cranfield School of Management, May 3-4 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ozga, J.: From research to policy and practice: some issues in knowledge transfer. In: CES Measuring Performance: Challenging Inequalities Conference (2003) Briefing Paper 31 April 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Ozga, J., Jones, R.: Travelling and embedded policy: the case of knowledge transfer. Journal of Education Policy 21(1), 1–17 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Parent, R., Roy, M., St Jacques, D.: A systems-based dynamic knowledge transfer capacity model. Journal of Knowledge Management 11(6), 81–93 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Prince, C.: Strategies for delivering third stream activity in new university business schools. Journal of European Industrial Training 31(9), 742–757 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. PACEC/ Centre for business research, University of Cambridge report: Evaluation of the effectiveness and role of HEFCE/OSI third stream funding (April 15, 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Rherrad, I.: Effect of entrepreneurial behaviour on researchers’ knowledge production. Evidence from Canadian universities. Higher Education Quarterl 63(2), 160–176 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Scottish Executive, A framework for higher education in Scotland. Edinburgh, Scottish Executive (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Shattock, M.: European universities for entrepreneurship: their role in the Europe of knowledge: The theoretical context. Higher Education Management and Policy 17(3), 13–27 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Tierney, W.: Academic freedom and organisational identity. Australian Universities Review 44, 7–14 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Trowler, P.: Academics responding to change: new higher education frameworks and academic cultures. OUP/SRHE.Universities Scotia, Buckingham (1998); Briefing: Knowledge Transfer and Commercialisation. Public Information Briefing 5 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Van Vught, F.: Mission diversity and reputation in higher education. Higher Education Policy Palgrave Journals 21, 151–174 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Von Hippel, E.: “Sticky information” and the locus of problem-solving: its implications for innovation. Management Science 40, 429–439 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Waeraas, A., Solbakk, M.: Defining the essence of a university: lessons from higher education branding. Higher Education 57(4), 449–462 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Wang, Y., Lu, L.: Knowledge transfer through effective university-industry interactions. Empirical Experiences from China. Journal of Technology Management in China 2(2), 119–133 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Wedgewood, M.: Mainstreaming the third stream. In: McNay, I. (ed.) Beyond Mass Higher Education, Ch. 11, Open University Press, Stony Stratford (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Weerts, D.J., Sandmann, L.R.: Building a two-way street: challenges and opportunities for community engagement at research universities. The Review of Higher Education 32(1), 73–106 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Whitchurch, C.: Shifting identities and blurring boundaries: the emergence of third space professionals in UK higher education. Higher Education Quarterly 62(4), 377–396 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Whitchurch, C.: The rise of the blended professional in higher education: a comparison between the UK, Australia and the United States. Higher Education 58(3), 407–418 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Winter, R.: Academic manager or managed academic? Academic identity schisms in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 31(2), 121–131 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Yin, R.K.: Case study research: design and methods. Sage. Thousand Oaks, California (2002), Prince, C. Strategies for delivering third stream activity in new university business schools. Journal of European Industrial Training 31(9), 742–757 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Reichenfeld, L. (2011). The Barriers to Academic Engagement with Enterprise: A Social Scientist’s Perspective. In: Howlett, R.J. (eds) Innovation through Knowledge Transfer 2010. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 9. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20508-8_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20508-8_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-20507-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-20508-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics