Abstract
This paper explores the barriers to academic engagement with enterprise from a social scientist’s perspective and in relation to United Kingdom post- 1994 universities in particular, expanding key themes from previous literature to consider both progress and the limiting factors which still face university managers in their attempts to implement their ‘change’ agendas.
The current strategy of re-orienting and branding universities as professional, managerial and efficient organisations, within which knowledge must be generated in a deliverable and transferable form to external recipients, is unpopular with many social science and humanities academics in particular, owing to the prevailing view among the latter that their identity is under threat. Hence the apparently widespread academic disengagement discussed in this article, which is explored in the context of the reluctant academic pressured to extend their role into often unfamiliar business-speak, commercial enterprise and industrial environments by a university strategy that assumes all academics are capable of incorporating academic enterprise into their day to day activities. The paper concludes that for universities to successfully rebrand as professional and commercially successful institutions they must adopt a more business like approach requiring first that they overcome the fear prevalent among many UK social scientist academics, at least, that their managers, and the higher education sector at large, have shed essential values which, since Humboldt’s time, have underpinned the very purpose of higher education institutions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Berman, J.: Connecting with industry: bridging the divide. J. High. Educ. Pol. Manag. 30, 165–174 (2008)
Boden, R., Deem, R., et al. (eds.): Geographies of knowledge, geometries of power: higher education in the twenty-first Century. Routledge, London (2008)
Davenport, T.H., Prusak, L.: Working knowledge: how organisations manage what they know, Boston (1998)
Delanty, G.: Challenging knowledge: the university in the knowledge society, OUP (2001)
Department of business, industry and society. White paper: Higher ambitions: the future of universities in the knowledge economy (November 2009)
D’Este, P., Patel, P.: University-industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry? Res. Pol. 36, 1295–1313 (2008)
Etzkowitz, H., Leydesdorff, L.: The dynamics of innovation: from national systems + “mode 2” to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Res. Pol. 20, 109–123 (2000)
Etzkowitz, H., de Mello, J.M.C.: The rise of a triple helix culture. Int. J. of Tech. Manag. and Sustable Devt. 2(3), 159–171 (2003)
Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C., Cantasino Terra, B.R.: The future of the university and the university of the future: Evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Res. Pol. 29, 313–330 (2000)
Findlow, S.: Accountability and innovation in higher education: a disabling tension? Stds. in High. Educ. 33(3), 313–329 (2008)
Francis-Smythe, J.: Enhancing academic engagement in knowledge transfer activity in the UK. Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education 12(3), 68–72 (2008)
Francis-Smythe, J., Haase, S., et al.: Competencies for academics in knowledge transfer activity. In: Proceedings of the British Psychological Society, 2007 Occupational Psychotherapy Conference, Bristol, England (2007)
Geuna, A., Muscio, A.: The governance of university knowledge transfer: a critical review of the literature, vol. 47, pp. 93–114. Springer Sciences Business Media, Heidelberg (2009)
Grant, R.M.: Contemporary strategy analysis. Blackwell Publishers, Malden (2002)
Hall, R.M.: The management of intellectual assets. Journal of General Management 15, 53–68 (2009)
Hannon, A., Silver, H.: Innovating in higher education: teaching, learning and institutional cultures. Studies in higher education. Open university press, Buckingham (2000)
Hardill, I., Baines, S.: Personal reflections on knowledge transfer and changing UK research priorities. Journal of the Academy of the Social Sciences 4(1), 83–96 (2009)
Hatakenaka, S.: Development of third stream activity. Lessons from international experience. Higher education policy institute, Higher education funding council for England (November 2005)
Higher education funding council for England 2009, Report on third stream funding (2009), http://www.hefce.co.uk/reports/2009 (accessed)
H.M. Government 2003. The future of higher education. Government white paper
H.M. Government 2004. Science and innovation investment framework: 2004-2014. H.M. Treasury (2004)
H.M Government 2006 Science & innovation investment framework 2004-2014. H.M . Treasury (2006)
H.M Government 2009 Department of Business, Innovation and Skills white paper: Higher ambitions: the future of universities in the knowledge economy (November 2009)
Jacobson, N.: Social epistemology: theory for the “fourth wave” of knowledge transfer and exchange research. Science Communication 29(1), 116–126 (2007)
Knowledge transfer partnerships/Technology strategy board. Application form, Part A (July 2009)
Lam, A.: Embedded firms, embedded knowledge: Problems of collaboration and knowledge transfer in global cooperative ventures. Organisation Studies 18(6), 973–996 (1997)
Laredo, P.: Revisiting the third mission of universities: towards a renewed categorisation of university activities? Higher Education Policy 20(4), 441–456 (2007)
Litan, R.E., Mitchell, L., Reedy, E.J.: Commercialising university innovations: alternative approaches. Social Sciences Research Network (2007), http://ssrn.com/abstract=976005 (accessed)
Macfarlane, B.: The disengaged academic: the retreat from citizenship. Higher Education Quarterly 59(4), 296–312 (2005)
Manchester Metropolitan University, The vision for the future. Published at Manchester Metropolitan University website (2009), http://www.mmu.ac.uk/about/vision/
Marley, L.: Quality and power in higher education. Oxford University Press, Maidenhead (2003)
Meyer, M.: Academic entrepreneurs or entrepreneurial academics? Research based ventures and public support mechanisms. Research and Development Management 33, 107–115 (2003)
Milne, P., McCormack, C. (2004) Academic autonomy in a climate of change. A Paper Presented at the Society for Research into Higher Education (SRHE), Bristol (December 2004), http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/ (accessed)
Nedeva, M.: New tricks and old dogs? The third mission and the reproduction of the university. In: Boden, R., Deem, R., et al. (eds.) Geographies of Knowledge, Geometries of Power: Higher Education in the Twenty-First Century. Routledge, London (2008)
Nedeva, M., Boden, R.: Dante’s third circle? Shaping the meaning, practice and consequences of the third mission. In: 2007 Conference Proceedings Society for Research into Higher Education, SRHE (2007), http://www.srhe.ac.uk/conference2007 (accessed)
Osbaldeston, M.: ’Global partnerships’ paper. In: ABS Conference, Cranfield School of Management, May 3-4 (2007)
Ozga, J.: From research to policy and practice: some issues in knowledge transfer. In: CES Measuring Performance: Challenging Inequalities Conference (2003) Briefing Paper 31 April 2004.
Ozga, J., Jones, R.: Travelling and embedded policy: the case of knowledge transfer. Journal of Education Policy 21(1), 1–17 (2006)
Parent, R., Roy, M., St Jacques, D.: A systems-based dynamic knowledge transfer capacity model. Journal of Knowledge Management 11(6), 81–93 (2007)
Prince, C.: Strategies for delivering third stream activity in new university business schools. Journal of European Industrial Training 31(9), 742–757 (2007)
PACEC/ Centre for business research, University of Cambridge report: Evaluation of the effectiveness and role of HEFCE/OSI third stream funding (April 15, 2009)
Rherrad, I.: Effect of entrepreneurial behaviour on researchers’ knowledge production. Evidence from Canadian universities. Higher Education Quarterl 63(2), 160–176 (2009)
Scottish Executive, A framework for higher education in Scotland. Edinburgh, Scottish Executive (2003)
Shattock, M.: European universities for entrepreneurship: their role in the Europe of knowledge: The theoretical context. Higher Education Management and Policy 17(3), 13–27 (2005)
Tierney, W.: Academic freedom and organisational identity. Australian Universities Review 44, 7–14 (2001)
Trowler, P.: Academics responding to change: new higher education frameworks and academic cultures. OUP/SRHE.Universities Scotia, Buckingham (1998); Briefing: Knowledge Transfer and Commercialisation. Public Information Briefing 5 (2005)
Van Vught, F.: Mission diversity and reputation in higher education. Higher Education Policy Palgrave Journals 21, 151–174 (2008)
Von Hippel, E.: “Sticky information” and the locus of problem-solving: its implications for innovation. Management Science 40, 429–439 (1994)
Waeraas, A., Solbakk, M.: Defining the essence of a university: lessons from higher education branding. Higher Education 57(4), 449–462 (2009)
Wang, Y., Lu, L.: Knowledge transfer through effective university-industry interactions. Empirical Experiences from China. Journal of Technology Management in China 2(2), 119–133 (2009)
Wedgewood, M.: Mainstreaming the third stream. In: McNay, I. (ed.) Beyond Mass Higher Education, Ch. 11, Open University Press, Stony Stratford (2006)
Weerts, D.J., Sandmann, L.R.: Building a two-way street: challenges and opportunities for community engagement at research universities. The Review of Higher Education 32(1), 73–106 (2008)
Whitchurch, C.: Shifting identities and blurring boundaries: the emergence of third space professionals in UK higher education. Higher Education Quarterly 62(4), 377–396 (2008)
Whitchurch, C.: The rise of the blended professional in higher education: a comparison between the UK, Australia and the United States. Higher Education 58(3), 407–418 (2009)
Winter, R.: Academic manager or managed academic? Academic identity schisms in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 31(2), 121–131 (2009)
Yin, R.K.: Case study research: design and methods. Sage. Thousand Oaks, California (2002), Prince, C. Strategies for delivering third stream activity in new university business schools. Journal of European Industrial Training 31(9), 742–757 (2007)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Reichenfeld, L. (2011). The Barriers to Academic Engagement with Enterprise: A Social Scientist’s Perspective. In: Howlett, R.J. (eds) Innovation through Knowledge Transfer 2010. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 9. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20508-8_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20508-8_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-20507-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-20508-8
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)