Skip to main content

Plain X-Rays for Penetrating Trauma

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Penetrating Trauma

Abstract

With the advent of new and sophisticated imaging technology, one may rightfully question whether there is still a role for conventional radiography in penetrating injuries. Though there is no question that advanced imaging provides superior resolution and diagnostic capability, there is still great utility in using plain x-rays for rapid assessment of penetrating injuries. Despite the limitations of x-rays, they can provide a wealth of rapid information to those experienced in their interpretation. We have presented several scenarios in which plain film imaging can be used for the initial evaluation in the patient sustaining penetrating trauma. In conjunction with physical examination, conventional radiography allows for more judicious use of adjunctive imaging studies, which in turn can reduce health care costs and resource utilization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 179.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Plurad D et al (2007) The increasing use of chest computed tomography for trauma: is it being overutilized? J Trauma 62(3):631–635

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Spaite DW (2006) The future of emergency care in the United States: the Institute of Medicine Subcommittee on Prehospital Emergency Medical Services. Ann Emerg Med 48(2):126–130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Seamon MJ et al (2008) Follow-up after asymptomatic penetrating thoracic injury: 3 hours is enough. J Trauma 65(3):549–553

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ho ML, Gutierrez FR (2009) Chest radiography in thoracic polytrauma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192(3):599–612

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Stapakis JC, Thickman D (1992) Diagnosis of pneumoperitoneum: abdominal CT vs. upright chest film. J Comput Assist Tomogr 16(5):713–716

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Woodring JH, Heiser MJ (1995) Detection of pneumoperitoneum on chest radiographs: comparison of upright lateral and posteroanterior projections. AJR Am J Roentgenol 165(1):45–47

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Tocino I, Miller MH (1987) Computed tomography in blunt chest trauma. J Thorac Imaging 2(3):45–59

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. von Oppell UO, Bautz P, De Groot M (2000) Penetrating thoracic injuries: what we have learnt. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 48(1):55–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Costantino M, Gosselin MV, Primack SL (2006) The ABC’s of thoracic trauma imaging. Semin Roentgenol 41(3):209–225

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tocino IM, Miller MH, Fairfax WR (1985) Distribution of pneumothorax in the supine and semirecumbent critically ill adult. AJR Am J Roentgenol 144(5):901–905

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Velmahos GC et al (1999) Predicting the need for thoracoscopic evacuation of residual traumatic hemothorax: chest radiograph is insufficient. J Trauma 46(1):65–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Shanmuganathan K, Matsumoto J (2006) Imaging of penetrating chest trauma. Radiol Clin North Am 44(2):225–238

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gasparri MG et al (2000) Physical examination plus chest radiography in penetrating periclavicular trauma: the appropriate trigger for angiography. J Trauma 49(6):1029–1033

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hanpeter DE et al (2000) Helical computed tomographic scan in the evaluation of mediastinal gunshot wounds. J Trauma 49(4):689–695

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Jones WG II, Ginsberg RJ (1992) Esophageal perforation: a continuing challenge. Ann Thorac Surg 53(3):534–543

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kerr TM et al (1989) Prospective trial of the six hour rule in stab wounds of the chest. Surg Gynecol Obstet 169(3):223–225

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Shatz DV et al (2001) Efficacy of follow-up evaluation in penetrating thoracic injuries: 3- vs. 6-hour radiographs of the chest. J Emerg Med 20(3):281–284

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Omert L et al (2001) Role of the emergency medicine physician in airway management of the trauma patient. J Trauma 51(6):1065–1068

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Rodriguez-Morales G, Rodriguez A, Shatney CH (1986) Acute rupture of the diaphragm in blunt trauma: analysis of 60 patients. J Trauma 26(5):438–444

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bertoldo U et al (2004) Retrograde venous bullet embolism: a rare occurrence-case report and literature review. J Trauma 57(1):187–192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Michelassi F et al (1990) Bullet emboli to the systemic and venous circulation. Surgery 107(3):239–245

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Donald J. Green .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bukur, M., Green, D.J. (2012). Plain X-Rays for Penetrating Trauma. In: Velmahos, G., Degiannis, E., Doll, D. (eds) Penetrating Trauma. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20453-1_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20453-1_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-20452-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-20453-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics