Skip to main content

Local Gravity Field Modelling in Rugged Terrain Using Spherical Radial Basis Functions: Case Study for the Canadian Rocky Mountains

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Geodesy for Planet Earth

Part of the book series: International Association of Geodesy Symposia ((IAG SYMPOSIA,volume 136))

Abstract

We analyze the performance of a least-squares approximation of the gravity field using Spherical Radial Basis Functions (SRBFs) in rugged mountains. The numerical experiment is conducted for the gravity disturbances and for the topographically corrected gravity disturbances, both provided on a 5 ×5 arc-min grid located at the Earth’s surface. The target area is a rough part of the Canadian Rocky Mountains with adjacent planes. The data area and the parameterization area extend the target area in all directions by 3 arc-deg. The accuracy of the gravity field approximation is investigated using a SRBF parameterization (Poisson wavelet of order 3) on different spherical equal-angular grids with step sizes varying between 6 and 12 arc-min. For every choice of grid, the optimal depth of SRBFs bellow the Bjerhammar sphere is found using the minimization of the RMS differences between predicted and observed values. The results of the numerical experiment reveal that the application of the topographical correction to the observed gravity data reduces the number of SRBFs by more than 56%, and improves the fit to the data by 12%. Unfortunately, it also introduces a systematic bias in the adjusted gravity disturbances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 469.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 599.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 599.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Forsberg R, Tscherning CC (1981) The use of height data in gravity field approximation by collocation. J Geoph Res 86:7843–7854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinze WJ (2003) Bouguer reduction density, why 2.67? Geophysics 68(5):1559–1560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holschneider M, Chambodut A, Mandea M (2003) From global to regional analysis of the magnetic field on the sphere using wavelet frames. Phys Earth Planet Int 135:107–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klees R, Tenzer R, Prutkin I, Wittwer T (2007) A data-driven approach to local gravity field modelling using spherical radial basis functions. J Geod 82:457–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kusche J (2003) A Monte-Carlo technique for weight estimation in satellite geodesy. J Geod 76:641–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchenko AN (1998) Parameterization of the Earth’s gravity field: point and line singularities. Lviv Astronomical and Geodetical Society, Lviv

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson K (1896) Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution. III – Regression, heredity and panmixia. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser A 187:253–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tenzer R, Klees R (2008) The choice of the spherical radial basis functions in local gravity field modelling. Stud Geophys Geod 52:287–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tenzer RR, Klees Prutkin I, Wittwer T, Alberts B, Schirmer U, Ihde J, Liebsch G, and Schäfer U (2009) Comparison of techniques for the computation of a height reference surface from gravity and GPS-levelling data. In: Sideris M (ed), Observing our Changing Earth, International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 133, Springer, Berlin, pp 263–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Vajda P, Ellmann A, Meurers B, Vaníček P, Novák P, Tenzer R (2008) Global ellipsoid-referenced topographic, bathymetric and stripping corrections to gravity disturbance. Stud Geoph Geod 52(1):19–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wahba G (1977) A survey of some smoothing problems and the method of generalized cross-validation for solving them. In: Krishnaiah PR (ed) Applications of statistics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North-Holland, pp 507–523

    Google Scholar 

  • Weightman JA (1965) Gravity, geodesy and artificial satellites. A unified approach. Proc. Symp. on the use of Artificial Satellites for Geodesy, Athens, Greece

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Tenzer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Tenzer, R., Klees, R., Wittwer, T. (2012). Local Gravity Field Modelling in Rugged Terrain Using Spherical Radial Basis Functions: Case Study for the Canadian Rocky Mountains. In: Kenyon, S., Pacino, M., Marti, U. (eds) Geodesy for Planet Earth. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 136. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20338-1_48

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics