Abstract
In this study we address the question of whether regional gravity field modeling techniques of GRACE data can offer improved resolution over traditional global spherical harmonic solutions. Earlier studies into large, equatorial river basins such as the Amazon, Zambezi and others showed no obvious distinction between regional and global techniques, but this may have been limited by the fact that these equatorial regions are at the latitudes where GRACE errors are known to be largest (due to the sparse groundtrack coverage). This study will focus on regions of higher latitude, specifically Greenland and Antarctica, where the density of GRACE measurements is much higher. The regional modeling technique employed made use of spherical radial basis functions (SRBF), complete with an optimal filtering algorithm. Comparisons of these regional solutions were made to a range of other publicly available global spherical harmonic solutions, and validated using ICESat laser altimetry. The timeframe considered was a 3 year period spanning from October 2003 to September 2006.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ditmar P, van Eck van der Sluijs AA (2004) A technique for modeling the Earth's gravity field on the basis of satellite accelerations. J Geodesy 78:12–33
Gunter BC, Urban T, Riva REM, Helsen M, Harpold R, Poole S, Nagel P, Schutz B, Tapley B (2009) A comparison of coincident GRACE and ICESat data over Antarctica. J Geodesy 83(11):1051–1060. doi:10.1007/s00190-009-0323-4
Holschneider M, Chambodut A, Mandea M (2003) From global to regional analysis of the magnetic field on the sphere using wavelet frames. Phys Earth Planet Inter 135:107–124
Jekeli C (1981) Alternative methods to smooth the Earth’s gravity field. Technical Report 327, Ohio State University, Department of Geodetic Science and Surveying, December 1981
Klees R, Liu X, Wittwer T, Gunter BC, Revtova EA, Tenzer R, Ditmar P, Winsemius HC, Savenije HHG (2008a) A comparison of global and regional GRACE models for land hydrology. Surv Geophys 29(4–5):335–359
Klees R, Revtova EA, Gunter BC, Ditmar P, Oudman E, Winsemius HC, Savenije HHG (2008b) The design of an optimal filter for monthly GRACE gravity models. Geophys J Int 175:417–432
Liu X (2008) Global gravity field recovery from satellite-to-satellite tracking data with the acceleration approach. Ph.D. Thesis, Netherlands Geodetic Commision, Publication on Geodesy 68, Delft, The Netherlands
Liu X, Ditmar P, Siemes C, Slobbe DC, Revtova EA, Klees R, Riva R, Zhao Q (2009) DEOS Mass Transport model (DMT-1) based on GRACE satellite data: methodology and validation. Geophys J Int 181(2):769–788
Luthcke S, Rowlands D, Lemoine F, Klosko S, Chinn D, McCarthy J (2006) Monthly spherical harmonic gravity field solutions determined from GRACE inter-satellite range-rate data alone. Geophys Res Lett 33:L02402
Stolk W (2009) An evaluation of the use of radial basis functions for mass change estimates at high latitudes. Msc Thesis, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands
Swenson S, Chambers D, Wahr J (2008) Estimating geocenter variations from a combination of GRACE and ocean model output. J Geophys Res 113, B08410, doi:10.1029/2007JB005338
Wittwer T (2009) Regional gravity field modeling with radial basis functions. Ph.D. Thesis, Netherlands Geodetic Commision, Publication on Geodesy 72, Delft, The Netherlands
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Tim Urban at the UT-Austin Center for Space Research for providing the ICESat crossover height change data.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Gunter, B.C., Wittwer, T., Stolk, W., Klees, R., Ditmar, P. (2012). Comparison of Regional and Global GRACE Gravity Field Models at High Latitudes. In: Kenyon, S., Pacino, M., Marti, U. (eds) Geodesy for Planet Earth. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 136. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20338-1_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20338-1_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-20337-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-20338-1
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)