Advertisement

Web 2.0: From a Buzzword to Mainstream Web Reality

  • Gottfried Vossen
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 130)

Abstract

Since 2006, everything has its Release 2, Version 0, abbreviated “2.0,” e.g., Silicon Valley 2.0, Family 2.0, Gadgets 2.0, Pub 2.0, Jobs 2.0, Health 2.0, Entertainment 2.0, Business 2.0, Music 2.0, Enterprise 2.0, Marketing 2.0, Law 2.0, Education 2.0, etc. All of this is a consequence of the term “Web 2.0” which was created at O’Reilly Media. But what is behind this shorthand: Is it just a buzzword, does it stand for a serious development, is it just for fun, or what? This paper discusses the core developments that have led to what is currently termed “Web 2.0”: net infrastructure, advances in programming, rich interactive functionality, large data collections, and user participation as well as socialization. For all of these, there are roots in the “earlier” Web, but only their recent confluence has resulted in the hype we are currently experiencing. The paper looks at Web 2.0 from the perspective of a user, outlines the impact this is having on enterprises, and finally mentions some open issues and future directions, thereby showing that Web 2.0 has emerged from a buzzword to mainstream Web reality.

Keywords

User Participation Large Data Collection Mass Collaboration Script Code Search Engine Provider 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Anderson, C.: The Long Tail. Why the Future of Business is Selling Less of More. Hyperion, NY (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Berners-Lee, T.: Weaving the Web: The Original Design and Ultimate Destiny of the World Wide Web. HarperCollins Publishers, New York (2000)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Crane, D., Pascarello, E., James, D.: Ajax in Action. Manning Publications Co., Greenwich (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, C., Kossinets, G., Kleinberg, J., Lee, L.: How opinions are received by online communities: a case study on amazon.com helpfulness votes. In: Proc. 18th Int. WWW Conf., pp. 141–150 (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dean, J., Ghemawat, S.: MapReduce: Simplified Data Processing on Large Clusters. In: Proc. 6th Symposium on Operating System Design and Implementation, pp. 137–150 (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Easley, D., Kleinberg, J.: Networks, Crowds, and Markets: Reasoning About a Highly Connected World. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Friedman, T.L.: The World is Flat – A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, NY (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Golder, S., Huberman, B.A.: Usage patterns of collaborative tagging systems. Journal of Information Science 32(2), 198–208 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hagemann, S., Letz, C., Vossen, G.: Web service discovery – reality check 2.0. In: Proc. 3rd International Conference on Next Generation Web Services Practices (NWeSP), Seoul, Korea, pp. 113–118 (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hagemann, S., Vossen, G.: ActiveTags: Making tags more useful anywhere on the Web. In: Proc. 20th Australasian Database Conf. Conferences in Research and Practice in Information Technology (CRPIT), vol. 92 (2009a)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hagemann, S., Vossen, G.: Web Page Augmentation with Client-Side Mashups as Meta-Querying (2009b) (submitted for publication)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hoeren, T., Vossen, G.: The Role of Law in an Electronic World Dominated by Web 2.0. Computer Science – Research and Development 23(1), 7–13 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jarvis, J.: What Would Google Do? Collins Business, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Johnson, D.: RSS and Atom in Action – Web 2.0 Building Blocks. Greenwich, CT (2006)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kleinberg, J.: The convergence of social and technological networks. Communications of the ACM 51(11), 66–72 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kossinets, G., Kleinberg, J., Watts, D.: The structure of information pathways in a social communication network. In: Proc. 14th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 435–443 (2008)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Liu, B.: Web Data Mining – Exploring Hyperlinks, Contents, and Usage Data. Springer, Berlin (2007)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Musser, J., O’Reilly, T.: Web 2.0 Principles and Best Practices. Sebastopol, CA (2007)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sakfo, L., Brake, D.K.: The Social Media Bible – Tactics, Tools, and Strategies for Business Success. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken (2009)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tapscott, D., Williams, A.: Wikinomics: How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything. Penguin Books, NY (2006)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Thies, G., Vossen, G.: Web-oriented architectures: On the impact of web 2.0 on service-oriented architectures. In: Proc. 2008 IEEE Asia-Pacific Services Computing Conference, Yilan, Taiwan, pp. 1075–1082 (2008)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Thies, G., Vossen, G.: Governance in Web-Oriented Architectures. To appear in Proc. 2009 IEEE Asia-Pacific Services Computing Conference (APSCC), Singapore (December 2009)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Vossen, G.: Have service-oriented architectures taken a wrong turn already? In: IFIP TC 8 International Conference on Research and Practical Issues of Enterprise Information Systems (CONFENIS 2006), Vienna, Austria, pp. xxiii–xxix (2006)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Vossen, G., Hagemann, S.: Unleashing Web 2.0 – From Concepts to Creativity. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Burlington (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gottfried Vossen
    • 1
  1. 1.European Research Center for Information Systems (ERCIS)University MuensterMuensterGermany

Personalised recommendations