Abstract
A knowledge of the mechanical properties of bacterial biofilms is required to more fully understand how a biofilm will physically respond, and adapt, to the physical forces, such as those caused by fluid flow or particle or bubble impingement, acting upon it. This is particularly important since biofilms are problematic in a wide diversity of scenarios and spatial and temporal scales and many control strategies designed to remove biofilms include a mechanical component such as fluid flow, particle or bubble impingement or a physical contact with the surface generated by scraping or brushing. Knowing when, and how, a biofilm might fail (through adhesive or cohesive failure) will allow better prediction of accumulation and biomass detachment, key processes required in the understanding of the structure and function of biofilm systems. However, the measurements of mechanical properties are challenging. Biofilms are living systems and they readily desiccate if removed from the liquid medium, it is not clear how quickly their mechanical properties might change when removed from their indigenous environment into a testing environment. They are also very thin and are inherently attached to a surface. They cannot be formed into standard test coupons such as plastics or solids, and cannot readily be poured or placed into conventional viscometers or rheometers, such as liquids and gels. Measured parameters such as the elastic and shear modulus, adhesive strength or tensile strength are sparse but are increasingly appearing in the literature. There is a large range of reported values for these properties, although there is general agreement that biofilms are viscoelastic. Biofilms have been assessed with various experimental methods depending on the desired characteristic and available equipment. The aforementioned challenges and lack of standard methods or equipment for testing attached biofilms have led to the development of many creative methods to tease out aspects of biofilm mechanical properties. In this paper, we review some of the more common techniques and highlight some recent results.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aggarwal S, Hozalski RM (2010) Determination of biofilm mechanical properties from tensile tests performed using a micro-cantilever method, 1029–2454. Biofouling: J Bioadhesion Biofilm Res 26(4):479–486
Aggarwal S, Poppele EH, Hozalski RM (2009) Development and testing of a novel microcantilever technique for measuring the cohesive strength of intact biofilms. Biotechnol Bioeng 105(5):924–934
Ahimou F, Semmens MJ, Novak PJ, Haugstad G (2007) Biofilm cohesiveness measurement using a novel atomic force microscopy methodology. Appl Environ Microbiol 73(9):2897–2904
Aravas N, Laspidou CS (2008) On the calculation of the elastic modulus of a biofilm streamer. Biotechnol Bioeng 101(1):196–200
Barraud N, Hassett DJ, Hwang SH, Rice SA, Kjelleberg S, Webb JS (2006) Involvement of nitric oxide in biofilm dispersal of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Bacteriol 188(21):7344–7353
Bartowsky EJ, Henschke PA (2008) Acetic acid bacteria spoilage of bottled red wine. Int J Food Microbiol 125(1):60–70
Beech IB, Sunner JA, Hiraoka K (2005) Microbe-surface interactions in biofouling and biocorrosion processes. Int Microbiol 8(3):157–168
Bradshaw DJ, Marsh PD (1999) Use of continuous flow techniques in modeling dental plaque biofilms. In: Doyle RJ (ed) Methods in enzymology, vol 310, Biofilms., pp 279–296
Cense AW, Van Dongen MEH, Gottenbos B, Nuijs AM, Shulepov SY (2006a) Removal of biofilms by impinging water droplets. J Appl Phys 100(12):124701–124708
Cense AW, Peeters EAG, Gottenbos B, Baaijens FPT, Nuijs AM, van Dongen MEH (2006b) Mechanical properties and failure of Streptococcus mutans biofilms, studied using a microindentation device. J Microbiol Meth 67(3):463–472
Chaboche JL (2008) A review of some plasticity and viscoplasticity constitutive theories. Int J Plast 24(10):1642–1693
Chen MJ, Zhang Z, Bott TR (1998) Direct measurement of the adhesive strength of biofilms in pipes by micromanipulation. Biotechnol Tech 12(12):875–880
Chen MJ, Zhang Z, Bott TR (2005) Effects of operating conditions on the adhesive strength of Pseudomonas fluorescens biofilms in tubes. Colloids Surf B 43(2):61–71
Chew JYM, Paterson WR, Wilson DI (2004a) Fluid dynamic gauging for measuring the strength of soft deposits. J Food Eng 65(2):175–187
Chew JYM, Cardoso SSS, Paterson WR, Wilson DI (2004b) CFD studies of dynamic gauging. Chem Eng Sci 59(16):3381–3398
Coetser SE, Cloete TE (2005) Biofouling and biocorrosion in industrial water systems. Crit Rev Microbiol 31(4):213–232
Costerton JW, Lewandowski Z, Caldwell DE, Korber DR, Lappin-Scott HM (1995) Microbial biofilms. Annu Rev Microbiol 49:711–745
Couarraze G, Grossiord J (1991) Initiation à la rhéologie, 2nd ed, Lavoisier – Tec & Doc, Paris
Coufort C, Derlon N, Ochoa-Chaves J, Liné A, Paul E (2007) Cohesion and detachment in biofilm systems for different electron acceptor and donors. Water Sci Technol 55(8–9):421–428
Davies DG, Marques CN (2009) A fatty acid messenger is responsible for inducing dispersion in microbial biofilms. J Bacteriol 191(5):1393–1403
de Beer D, Stoodley P, Roe F, Lewandowski Z (1994) Effects of biofilm structures on oxygen distribution and mass transport. Biotech Bioeng 43:1131–1138
Derlon N, Masse´ A, Escudie´ R, Bernet N, Paul E (2008) Stratification in the cohesion of biofilms grown under various environmental conditions. Water Res 42(8–9):2102–2110
Dunsmore BC, Jacobsen A, Hall-Stoodley L, Bass CJ, Lappin-Scott HM, Stoodley P (2002) The influence of fluid shear on the structure and material properties of sulphate-reducing bacterial biofilms. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 29(6):347–353
Godon J-J, Zumstein E, Dabert P, Habouzit F, Moletta R (1997) Molecular microbial diversity of an anaerobic digestor as determined by small-subunit rDNA sequence analysis. Appl Environ Microbiol 63(7):2802–2813
Grédiac M, Pierron F, Avril S, Toussaint E (2006) The virtual fields method for extracting constitutive parameters from full-field measurements: a review. Strain Int J Exp Mech 42:233–253, DOI:dx.doi.org
Hohne DN, Younger JG, Solomon MJ (2009) Flexible microfluidic device for mechanical property characterization of soft viscoelastic solids such as bacterial biofilms. Langmuir 25(13):7743–7751
Klapper I, Rupp CJ, Cargo R, Purvedorj B, Stoodley P (2002) Viscoelastic fluid description of bacterial biofilm material properties. Biotechnol Bioeng 80(3):289–296
Körstgens V, Flemming H-C, Wingender J, Borchard W (2001a) Uniaxial compression measurement device for investigation of the mechanical stability of biofilms. J Microbiol Meth 46(1):9–17
Körstgens V, Flemming H-C, Wingender J, Borchard W (2001b) Influence of calcium ions on the mechanical properties of a model biofilm of mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Water Sci Technol 43(6):49–57
Lau PCY, Dutcher JR, Beveridge TJ, Lam JS (2009) Absolute quantitation of bacterial biofilm adhesion and viscoelasticity by microbead force spectroscopy. Biophys J 96(7):2935–2948
Lemaitre J, Chaboche JL (1988) Mécanique des matériaux solides, Dunod, 2ème édition
Liao Q, Wang Y-J, Wang Y-Z, Zhu X, Tian X, Li J (2010) Formation and hydrogen production of photosynthetic bacterial biofilm under various illumination conditions. Bioresour Technol 101(14):5315–5324
Mandel J (1958) Théorie générale de la viscoélasticité linéaire. Cahier du Groupe Français de Rhéologie 3(4):21–35
Mathias JD, Stoodley P (2009) Applying the digital image correlation method to estimate the mechanical properties of bacterial biofilms subjected to a wall shear stress. Biofouling 25(8):695–703
Mignot F, Puel JP, Suquet PM (1980) Bifurcation and homogenization. Int J Eng Sci 18(2):409–414
Möhle RB, Langemann T, Haesner M, Augustin W, Scholl S, Neu TR, Hempel DC, Horn H (2007) Structure and shear strength of microbial biofilms as determined with confocal laser scanning microscopy and fluid dynamic gauging using a novel rotating disc biofilm reactor. Biotechnol Bioeng 98(4):747–755
Nowacki W (1965) Théorie du fluage. Eyrolles Ed, Paris, 219p
Ohashi A, Harada H (1994) Adhesion strength of biofilm developed in an attached growth reactor. Water Sci Technol 29(10–11):281–288
Ohashi A, Harada H (1996) A novel concept for evaluation of biofilm adhesion strength by applying tensile force and shear force. Water Sci Technol 34(5–6):201–211
Ohashi A, Koyama T, Syutsubo K, Harada H (1999) A novel method for evaluation of biofilm tensile strength resisting erosion. Water Sci Technol 39(7):261–268
Ortiz M, Pandolfi A (1999) Finite-deformation irreversible cohesive elements for three-dimensional crack-propagation analysis. Int J Numer Methods Eng 44:1267–1282
Picologlou BF, Zelver N, Characklis WG (1980) Biofilm growth and hydraulic performance. J Hydraulics Division Am Soc Civ Eng 106(HY5):733–746
Poppele EH, Hozalski RM (2003) Micro-cantilever method for measuring the tensile strength of biofilms and microbial flocs. J Microbiol Meth 55(3):607–615
Rickard AH, McBain AJ, Stead AT, Gilbert P (2004) Shear rate moderates community diversity in freshwater biofilms. Appl Environ Microbiol 70(12):7426–7435
Rochex A, Godon J-J, Bernet N, Escudié R (2008) Role of shear stress on composition, diversity and dynamics of biofilm bacterial communities. Water Res 42(20):4915–4922
Socransky SS, Haffajee AD (2002) Dental biofilms: difficult therapeutic targets. Periodontol 2000 28(1):12–55
Stoodley P, Lewandowski Z, Boyle JD, Lappin-Scott HM (1999a) Structural deformation of bacterial biofilms caused by short-term fluctuations in fluid shear: an in situ investigation of biofilm rheology. Biotechnol Bioeng 65(1):83–92
Stoodley P, Lewandowski Z, Boyle JD, Lappin-Scott HM (1999b) The formation of migratory ripples in a mixed species bacterial biofilm growing in turbulent flow. Environ Microbiol 1(5):447–455
Stoodley P, Wilson S, Hall-Stoodley L, Boyle JD, Lappin-Scott HM, Costerton JW (2001a) Growth and detachment of cell clusters from mature mixed-species biofilms. Appl Environ Microbiol 67(12):5608–5613
Stoodley P, Cargo R, Rupp CJ, Wilson S, Klapper I (2002) Biofilm material properties as related to shear-induced deformation and detachment phenomena. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 29(6):361–367
Sutton M, Wolters W, Perters W, Ranson W, McNeill S (1983) Determination of displacements using an improved digital correlation method. Image Vis Comput 1(3):133–139
Taherzadeh D, Picioreanu C, Küttler U, Simone A, Wall WA, Horn H (2010) Computational study of the drag and oscillatory movement of biofilm streamers in fast flows. Biotechnol Bioeng 105(3):600–610
Towler BW, Rupp CJ, Cunningham ALB, Stoodley P (2003) Viscoelastic properties of a mixed culture biofilm from rheometer creep analysis. Biofouling 19(5):279–285
Vinogradov AM, Winston M, Rupp CJ, Stoodley P (2004) Rheology of biofilms formed from the dental plaque pathogen Streptococcus mutans. Biofilms 1:49–56
Wagner M, Loy A (2002) Bacterial community composition and function in sewage treatment systems. Curr Opin Biotechnol 13(3):218–227
Willcock L, Gilbert P, Holah J, Wirtanen G, Allison DG (2000) A new technique for the performance evaluation of clean-inplace disinfection of biofilms. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 25(5):235–241
Woolard CR, Irvine RL (1994) Biological treatment of hypersaline wastewater by a biofilm of halophilic bacteria. Water Environ Res 66(3):230–235
Xu X-P, Needleman A (1994) Numerical simulations of fast crack growth in brittle solids. J Mech Phys Solids 42:1397–1434
Yeung AKC, Pelton R (1996) Micromechanics: a new approach to studying the strength and breakup of flocs. J Colloid Interface Sci 184(2):579–585
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Guélon, T., Mathias, JD., Stoodley, P. (2011). Advances in Biofilm Mechanics. In: Flemming, HC., Wingender, J., Szewzyk, U. (eds) Biofilm Highlights. Springer Series on Biofilms, vol 5. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19940-0_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19940-0_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-19939-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-19940-0
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)