Skip to main content
  • 14k Accesses

Zusammenfassung

»Are you in or out?« Diese Frage stellt Danny Ocean seinen »11 Spezialisten« in dem Hollywood-Blockbuster, um sie für sein Projekt zu gewinnen, einen Coup, bei dem es um 150 Mio. Dollar eines Las Vegas Casinos geht – und die Rückeroberung einer Frau. »Das Team« ist handverlesen und besteht nur aus Spezialisten. Es sind die Besten, die sich hier zusammenfinden: Vom Meister-Taschendieb über den genialen Fälscher bis hin zum Pyrotechniker. Jeder trägt seine Expertise zum Projekt bei. Die Zusammenarbeit läuft reibungslos, keiner kommt dem anderen ins Gehege, alle stehen hinter dem Ziel und sie geben ihr Bestes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Bach, N. (2008). Triebkräfte im Markt für Interim Management. In H. Dahl (Hrsg.), Interim Management. Frechen: Datakontext Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, S. T. (2007). Deep-level composition as predictors of team performance: A metaanalysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 595–615.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, C. S., Stagl, K. C., Klein, C., Goodwin, G. F., Salas, E. & Halpin, S. (2006). What type of leadership behaviors are functional in teams? A meta-analysis. Leadership Quarterly, 17, 288–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chattopadhyay, P., George, E. & Lawrence S. A. (2004). Why does dissimilarity matter? Exploring self-categorization, self-enhancement, and uncertainty reduction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 892–900.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S. G. & Bailey, D. E. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23, 239–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galais, N. (2008). Erfahrungen von Interim Managern in Deutschland – Ergebnisse einer empirischen Studie. In H. Dahl (Hrsg.), Interim Management. Frechen: Datakontext Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertel, G., Bretz, E. & Moser, K. (2000). Freiwilliges Arbeitsengagement: Begriffsklärung und Forschungsstand. Gruppendynamik und Organisationsberatung, 31, 121–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPMA (2006). ICBIPMA Competence Baseline, Version 3.0. International Project Management Baseline.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendrick, T. (2006). Results without authority. Controlling a project when the team doesn’t report to you. New York: Amacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kernan, M.C. & Lord, R.G. (1989). The effects of explicit goals and specific feedback on escalation processes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 13, 1125–1143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCauley, C. D., Ruderman, M. N., Ohlott, P. J. & Morrow, J. (1994). Assessing the developmental components of managerial jobs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 544–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Packendorff, J. (1995). Inquiring into the temporary organization: New directions for project management research. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 11, 319–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R. S. & Behfar, K. J. (2003). The dynamic relationship between performance feedback, trust, and conflict in groups: A longitudinal study. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 92, 102–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raven, B. H. & French, R. P. (1958). Legitimate power, coercive power, and observability in social influence. Sociomentry, 21, 83–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuler, H. (2006) (Hrsg.). Lehrbuch der Personalpsychologie. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, H. J. & Kell, M. (2003). The reluctance to report bad news on troubled software projects: A theoretical model. Information Systems Journal, 13, 69–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonnenfeld, J. A. & Peiperl, M. A. (1988). Staffing policy as a strategic response: A typology of career systems. Academy of Management Review, 13, 588–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonntag, K. (2002). Personalentwicklung und Training. Stand der psychologischen Forschung und Gestaltung. Zeitschrift für Personalpsychologie, 2, 59–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tannenbaum, S. I., Salas, E. & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (1996). Promoting team effectiveness. In M. A. West (Ed.), Handbook of Work Group Psychology (pp. 503–529). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Knippenberg, D., De Dreu, C. K.W. & Homan, A. C. (2004). Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 1008–1022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • West, M. A., Borrill, C. S. & Unsworth, K. I. (1998). Team effectiveness in organizations. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (Vol. 13, pp. 1–48). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Medizin Verlag Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Moser, K., Galais, N. (2012). Personalpsychologie im Projektmanagement. In: Wastian, M., Braumandl, I., von Rosenstiel, L. (eds) Angewandte Psychologie für das Projektmanagement. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19920-2_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics