Advertisement

Supplier Selection Based on the PROMETHEE VI Multicriteria Method

  • Luciana Alencar
  • Adiel Almeida
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6576)

Abstract

Nowadays, supplier selection has become a strategic activity for many companies that wish to increase the competitiveness of their supply chain. The tendency is to maintain a long-term relationship based on trust and commitment. To achieve this aim, it is necessary to re-structure the supplier selection process, incorporate more criteria in the evaluation and deal in an appropriate way with the preferences of the decision-makers (DMs) involved. Thus, this paper presents a structure for selecting suppliers that considers the preferences of multiple DMs involved in the process. It is considered that their preferences do not present great variation, it therefore being possible to deal with them adequately and to select the supplier who presents the best compromise using the PROMETHEE VI method. A numerical application is presented.

Keywords

supplier selection group decision multicriteria methods 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Lysons, K., Farrington, B.: Purchasing and Supply Chain Management. Prentice Hall, Harlow (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gonzallez, M.E., Quesada, G., Monge, C.A.: Determining the importance of the supplier selection process in manufacturing: a case study. Int. J. of Physical Distrib. & Logistics Manag. 34, 492–504 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dickson, G.: An analysis of vendor selection systems and decisions. J. Purch. 2, 5–17 (1966)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dulmin, R., Mininno, V.: Supplier selection using a multi-criteria decision aid method. J. Purch. & Supply Manag. 9, 177–187 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Araz, C., Ozkarahan, I.: Supplier evaluation and management system for strategic sourcing based on a new multicriteria sorting procedure. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 106, 585–606 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    De Boer, L., Wegen, L.V., Telgen, J.: Outranking methods in support of supplier selection. Eur. J. Purch. & Supply Manag. 4, 109–118 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tama, M.C., Tummala, V.M.: An application of the AHP in vendor selection of a telecommunications system. Omega 29, 171–182 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Handfield, R., et al.: Applying environmental criteria to supplier assessment: A study in the application of the Analytical Hierarchy Process. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 141, 70–87 (2002)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Levary, R.R.: Ranking foreign suppliers based on supply risk. Supply Chain Manag.: an Int. J. 12, 392–394 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Almeida, A.T.: Multicriteria Decision Making on Maintenance: Spares and Contracts Planning. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 129, 235–241 (2001)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Saen, R.F.: A new mathematical approach for suppliers selection: accounting for non-homogeneity is important. Appl. Math. Comput. 185, 84–95 (2007)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ho, W., Xu, X., Dey, P.K.: Multicriteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: a literature review. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 202, 16–24 (2010)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Almeida, A.T.: Multicriteria Modelling of Repair Contract Based on Utility and ELECTRE I Method with Dependability and Service Quality Criteria. Annals of Oper. Res. 138, 113–126 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ordoobadi, S.M.: Development of a supplier selection model using fuzzy logic. Supply Chain Manag.: Int. J. 14, 314–327 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Almeida, A.T.: Multicriteria decision model for outsourcing contracts selection based on utility function and ELECTRE method. Comp. and Oper. Res. 34, 3569–3574 (2007)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kahraman, C., Cebeci, U., Ulukan, Z.: Multi-criteria supplier selection using Fuzzy AHP. Log. Inf. Mang. 16, 382–394 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wu, D.: Supplier selection in a fuzzy group setting: A method using grey related analysis and Dempster-Shafer theory. Expert Systems with Applications 36, 8892–8899 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhang, D., et al.: An novel approach to supplier selection based on vague sets group decision. Expert Systems with Applications 36, 9557–9563 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Singh, D., Tiong, R.: A fuzzy decision framework for contractor selection. J. Const. Eng. and Manag. 131, 62–70 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pongpeng, J., Liston, J.: Contractor ability criteria: a view from the Thai construction industry. Construction Management and Economics 21, 267–282 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Al-Reshaid, K., Kartam, N.: Design-build pre-qualification and tendering approach for public projects. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 23, 309–320 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fu, C., Yang, S.-L.: The group consensus based evidential reasoning approach for multiple attributive group decision analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 206, 601–608 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Parreiras, R., Ekel, P., Martini, J., Palhares, R.: A flexible consensus scheme for multicriteria group decision making under linguistic assessments. Inf. Sciences. 180, 1075–1089 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Leyva-Lpez, J., Fernndez-Gonzalez, E.: A new method for group decision support based on ELECTRE III methodology. Eur. J. of Operational Research. 26, 14–27 (2003)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Vincke, P.: Multicriteria decision-aid. Wiley, Bruxelles (1992)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Brans, J.P., Vincke, P.H.: A preference ranking organization method, the PROMETHEE method for MCDM. Manag. Science. 31, 647–656 (1985)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Brans, J.P., Mareschal, B.: The PROMETHEE VI procedure: how to differentiate hard from soft multicriteria problems. J. Dec. Syst. 4, 213–223 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mareschal, B., Brans, J.: Geometrical representation for MCDM: the GAIA procedure. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 34, 69–77 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Brans, J., Mareschal, B.: PROMÉTHÉE - GAIA: une méthodologie d’aide á la décision en présence de critéres multiples. Éditions de L’Université de Bruxelles, Bruxelles (2002)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Alencar, L., Almeida, A.: A model for selecting project team members using multicriteria group decision making. Pesquisa Operacional 30, 221–236 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luciana Alencar
    • 1
  • Adiel Almeida
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Management EngineeringFederal University of PernambucoRecifeBrazil

Personalised recommendations