Skip to main content

A MCDM Model for Urban Water Conservation Strategies Adapting Simos Procedure for Evaluating Alternatives Intra-criteria

  • Conference paper
Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization (EMO 2011)

Abstract

This paper proposes a MCDM model based on the SMARTER method for the problem of urban water conservation strategies. The main contribution of this decision model is the use of Simos procedure adapted for evaluating alternatives intra-criteria, specifically on qualitative attributes. In fact, analyses of water resources problems are normally very complex, not only because this involves multiple alternative actions and objectives, but also because many attributes are subjective or need to be evaluated qualitatively. Nevertheless, there are many approaches to dealing with a semantic scale so as to make evaluation easier. However, it is often the case that the DM does not feel comfortable with the fixed nominal scale adopted or with the number of evaluations since the alternatives often need to be compared pairwise. On the other hand, a simple conversion from a nominal to an ordinal scale normally loses information. For these reasons, this paper proposes an adaptation of Simos procedure, associating ’playing cards’ to evaluate alternatives on qualitative attributes, in order to facilitate the elicitation process. To show the applicability of the model proposed, a Brazilian case study is conducted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Silva, V. B. S., Morais, D. C., Almeida, A. T.: A Multicriteria Group Decision Model to Support Watershed Committees in Brazil. Water Resources Management (2010) doi:10.1007/s11269-010-9648-2

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ahmad, S., Prashar, D.: Evaluating Municipal Water Conservation Policies Using a Dynamic Simulation Model. Water Resources Management 24, 3371–3395 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Morais, D.C., Almeida, A.T.: Water network rehabilitation: a group decision-making approach. Water S.A. 36, 1–7 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Morais, D.C., Almeida, A.T.: Group Decision-Making for Leakage Management Strategy of Water Network. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 52, 441–459 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kallis, G., Ray, I., Fulton, J., McMahon, J.E.: Public Versus Private: Does It Matter for Water Conservation? Insights from California. Environmental Management 45, 177–191 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Randolph, B., Troy, P.: Attitudes to conservation and water consumption. Environmental science & policy 11, 441–455 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Morais, D.C., Almeida, A.T.: Water supply system decision making using multicriteria analysis. Water S.A. 32, 229–235 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hajkowicz, S., Higgins, A.: A comparison of criteria analysis techniques for water resource management. European Journal of Operational Research 184, 255–265 (2008)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Shepetukha, Y., Olson, D.L.: Comparative Analysis of Multi-attribute Techniques Based on Cardinal and Ordinal Inputs. Mathematical and Computer Modeling 34, 229–241 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Weber, M.: Decision making with incomplete information. European Journal of Operational Research 28, 1–12 (1987)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Bana e Costa, C.A., Vansnick, J.C.: MACBETH - An Interactive Path Towards the Construction of Cardinal Value Functions. International Transactions in Operational Research 1, 489–500 (1994)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Figueira, J.R., Greco, S., Ehrgott, M. (eds.): Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys. Springer-Media, New York (2005)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Figueira, J.R., Roy, B.: Determining the weights of criteria in the ELECTRE type methods with a revised Simos procedure. European Journal of Operational Research 139, 317–326 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Simos, J.: L’évaluation environnementale: Un processus cognitif négocié. Thése de doctorat, DGF-EPFL, Lausanne (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Edwards, W., Hutton, B.F.: SMARTS and SMARTER: improved simple methods for multi-attribute utility measurement. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 60, 306–325 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Barron, F.H., Barrett, B.E.: The efficacy of SMARTER - Simple Multi-Attribute Rating Technique Extended to Ranking. Acta Psychologica 93, 23–36 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Olson, D.L.: Comparison of three multicriteria methods to predict known outcomes. European Journal of Operational Research 130, 576–587 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Fontana, M.E., Morais, D.C., de Almeida, A.T. (2011). A MCDM Model for Urban Water Conservation Strategies Adapting Simos Procedure for Evaluating Alternatives Intra-criteria. In: Takahashi, R.H.C., Deb, K., Wanner, E.F., Greco, S. (eds) Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization. EMO 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6576. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19893-9_39

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19893-9_39

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-19892-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-19893-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics