Skip to main content

A Framework for Locating Logistic Facilities with Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis

  • Conference paper
Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization (EMO 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 6576))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Locating logistic facilities, such as plants and distribution centres, in an optimal way, is a crucial decision for manufacturers, particularly those that are operating in large developing countries which are experiencing a process of fast economic change. Traditionally, such decisions have been supported by optimising network models, which search for the configuration with the minimum total cost. In practice, other intangible factors, which add or reduce value to a potential configuration, are also important in the location choice. We suggest in this paper an alternative way to analyse such problems, which combines the value from the topology of a network (such as total cost or resilience) with the value of its discrete nodes (such as specific benefits of a particular location). In this framework, the focus is on optimising the overall logistic value of the network. We conclude the paper by discussing how evolutionary multi-objective methods could be used for such analyses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aikens, C.H.: Facility location models for distribution planning. European Journal of Operational Research 22, 263–279 (1985)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Badri, M.A.: Combining the analytic hierarchy process and goal programming for global facility location-allocation problem. International Journal of Production Economics 62, 237–248 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badri, M.A., Mortagy, A.K., Alsayed, A.: A multi-objective model for locating fire stations. European Journal of Operational Research 110, 243–260 (1998)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ballou, R.H.: Business Logistics/Supply Chain Management. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Belton, V., Elder, M.D.: Decision support systems: Learning from visual interactive modelling. Decision Support Systems 12, 355–364 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowersox, D.J., Closs, D.J., Cooper, M.B.: Supply Chain Logistics Management, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Branke, J., Deb, K.: Integrating user preferences into evolutionary multi-objective optimisation. In: Jin, Y. (ed.) Knowledge Incorporation in Evolutionary Computation, pp. 461–478. Springer, Berlin (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, S., Chan, C.W., Huang, G.H.: An integrated multi-criteria decision analysis and inexact mixed integer linear programming approach for solid waste management. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 16, 543–554 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Current, J., Min, H., Schilling, D.: Multiobjective analysis of facility location decisions. European Journal of Operational Research 49, 295–307 (1990)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Daskin, M.S.: Network and discrete location: models, algorithms, and applications. Wiley, New York (1995)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Deb, K.: Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. Wiley, New York (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • de Geus, A.P.: Planning as Learning. Harvard Business Review, 70–74 (March-April 1988)

    Google Scholar 

  • Farahani, R.Z., Asgari, N.: Combination of MCDM and covering techniques in a hierarchical model for facility location: A case study. European Journal of Operational Research 176, 1839–1858 (2007)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Franco, A., Montibeller, G.: Invited Review - Facilitated modeling in Operational Research. European Journal of Operational Research 205, 489–500 (2010)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Giannikos, I.: A multiobjective programming model for locating treatment sites and routing hazardous wastes. European Journal of Operational Research 104, 333–342 (1998)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hugo, A., Pistikopoulos, E.N.: Environmentally conscious long-range planning and design of supply chain networks. Journal of Cleaner Production 13, 1471–1491 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D.F., Mirrazavi, S.K., Tamiz, M.: Multi-objective meta-heuristics: An overview of the current state-of-the-art. European Journal of Operational Research 137, 1–9 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, R.L.: Evaluation of Proposed Storage Sites. Operations Research 27, 48–64 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, R.L.: Value-Focused Thinking. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1992)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, R.L.: Common mistakes in making value trade-offs. Operations Research 50, 935–945 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Klose, A., Drexl, A.: Facility location models for distribution system design. European Journal of Operational Research 162, 4–29 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Koksalan, M., Phelps, S.: An Evolutionary Metaheuristic for Approximating Preference-Nondominated Solutions. INFORMS J. on Computing 19, 291–301 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Malczewski, J., Ogryczak, W.: The multiple criteria location problem: 2. Preference-based techniques and interactive decision support. Environment and Planning A 28, 69–98 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • Marler, R.T., Arora, J.S.: Survey of multi-objective optimization methods for engineering. Struct. Multidisc. Optim. 26, 369–395 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Min, H.: Location analysis of international consolidation terminals using the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Journal Of Business Logistics 15, 25–44 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirchandani, P.B., Reilly, J.M.: Spatial distribution design for fire fighting units. In: Ghosh, A., Rushton, G. (eds.) Spatial Analysis and Location-Allocation Models, pp. 186–223. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  • Melo, M.T., Nickel, S., Saldanha-da-Gama, F.: Facility location and supply chain management - a review. European Journal of Operational Research 196, 401–412 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Nickel, S., Puerto, J., Rodriguez-Chia, A.M.: MCDM location problems. In: Figueira, J., Greco, S., Ehrgott, M. (eds.) Multiple criteria decision making: state of the art surveys, pp. 761–795. Springer, Berlin (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, T.J.: Robustness of Additive Value Function Methods in MCDM. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis 5, 301–309 (1996)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tamiz, M., Jones, D., Romero, C.: Goal programming for decision making: An overview of the current state-of-the-art. European Journal of Operational Research 111, 569–581 (1998)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • von Winterfeld, D.: On the relevance of behavioral decision research for decision analysis. In: Shanteau, S., Mellers, B.A., Schum, D.A. (eds.) Decision science and technology: reflections on the contributions of Ward Edwards, pp. 133–154. Kluwer, Norwell (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wallenius, J., Dyer, J.S., Fishburn, P.C., Steuer, R.E., Zionts, S., Deb, K.: Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Multiattribute Utility Theory: Recent Accomplishments and What Lies Ahead. Management Science 54, 1336–1349 (2008)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, L., Jones, B.F., Yang, S.-H.: A fuzzy multi-objective programming for optimization of fire station locations through genetic algorithms. European Journal of Operational Research 181, 903–915 (2007)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yurimoto, S., Masui, T.: Design of a decision support system for overseas plant location in the EC. Int. J. Production Economics 41, 411–418 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Montibeller, G., Yoshizaki, H. (2011). A Framework for Locating Logistic Facilities with Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis. In: Takahashi, R.H.C., Deb, K., Wanner, E.F., Greco, S. (eds) Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization. EMO 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6576. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19893-9_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19893-9_35

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-19892-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-19893-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics