Advertisement

Aesthetic Design Using Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms

  • António Gaspar-Cunha
  • Dirk Loyens
  • Ferrie van Hattum
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6576)

Abstract

The use of computational methodologies for the optimization of aesthetic parameters is not frequent mainly due to the fact that these parameters are not quantifiable and are subjective. In this work an interactive methodology based on the use of multi-objective optimization algorithms is proposed. This strategy associates the results of different optimization runs considering the existent quantifiable objectives and different sets of boundary conditions concerning the decision variables, as defined by an expert decision maker. The associated results will serve as initial population of solutions for a final optimization run. The idea is that a more global picture of potential “good” solutions can be found. At the end this will facilitate the work of the expert decision maker since more solutions are available. The method was applied to a case study and the preliminary results obtained showed the potentially of the strategy adopted.

Keywords

aesthetic design multi-objective evolutionary algorithms 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Reffat, R.M.: Computing in architectural design: reflections and an approach to new generations of CAAD. The Journal of Information Technology in Construction 11, 655–668 (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Oxman, R.: Theory and design in the first digital age. Design Studies 27, 229–265 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kolarevic, B.: Architecture in the Digital Age: Design and Manufacturing. Spon Press, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Liu, Y.-T., Lim, C.-K.: New tectonics: a preliminary framework involving classic and digital thinking. Design Studies 27, 267–307 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Caldas, L.G.: An evolution-based generative design system : using adaptation to shape architectural form. PhD Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (August 23, 2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shea, K., Aish, R., Gourtovaia, M.: Towards integrated performance-driven generative design tools. Automation in Construction 14, 253–264 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kilian, A.: Design exploration through bidirectional modelling of constraints. PhD Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (August 25, 2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kolarevic, B., Malkawi, A.M.: Performative Architecture: Beyond Instrumentality. Spon Press, London (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    van Hinte, E., Beukers, A.: Lightness: The Inevitable Renaissance of Minimum Energy Structures, 3rd edn., Uitgeverij, Rotterdam (1998)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sass, L., Oxman, R.: Materializing design: the implications of rapid prototyping in digital design. Design Studies 27, 325–355 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rogers, D.F.: An Introduction to NURBS with Historical Perspective. Morgan Kaufmann, London (2001)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Robert McNeel & Associates, www.rhino3d.com (accessed in 2010)
  13. 13.
    Autodesk - Ecotect, www.autodesk.com/ecotect (accessed in 2010)
  14. 14.
    Deb, K.: Multi-objective Optimization using Evolutionary Algorithms. Wiley, Chichester (2001)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Miettinen, K.M.: Nonlinear Multiobjective Optimization. Kluwer, Boston (1999)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hwang, C.L., Masud, A.S.: Multiple Objective Decision Making - Methods and Applications. Springer, Berlin (1979)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ferreira, J.C., Fonseca, C.M., Gaspar-Cunha, A.: Assessing the quality of the relation between scalarizing function parameters and solutions in multiobjective optimization. In: IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (IEEE CEC 2009), Trondheim, Norway (2009)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gaspar-Cunha, A.: Modeling and Optimization of Single Screw Extrusion. PhD Thesis, University of Minho, Portugal (2000)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gaspar-Cunha, A., Covas, J.A.: RPSGAe-A Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm with Elitism: Application to Polymer Extrusion. In: Metaheuristics for Multiobjective Optimisation. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • António Gaspar-Cunha
    • 1
  • Dirk Loyens
    • 2
    • 3
  • Ferrie van Hattum
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Polymer and Composites/I3NUniversity of MinhoGuimarãesPortugal
  2. 2.School of ArchitectureUniversity of MinhoGuimarãesPortugal
  3. 3.ESAD Escola Superior de Artes e DesignAvenida Calouste GulbenkianSenhora da Hora, MatosinhosPortugal

Personalised recommendations