Skip to main content

Recommendation of Learning Material through Students´ Collaboration and User Modeling in an Adaptive E-Learning Environment

  • Chapter
Technology-Enhanced Systems and Tools for Collaborative Learning Scaffolding

Abstract

In this chapter, we present an approach for recommendation of learning materials to students in an e-learning environment. Our aim is to increase the current system’s personalization capabilities for students in different scenarios making use of recommendation techniques. The recommendation is produced considering learning materials’ properties, student’s profile and the context of use. In addition, the process of recommendation is improved through students´ collaboration. In the context of this work, a learning material is a link to a Web page or a paper available on the Web and previously stored in a private repository. The process of collaboration occurs during student’s evaluations of the recommendations. These student´s evaluations are used by the system to produce new recommendations for other students. The main features of the recommendations aspects are described and some examples are also used to discuss and illustrate how to provide this personalization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adomavicius, G., Tuzhilin, A.: Multidimensional recommender systems: A data warehousing approach. In: Fiege, L., Mühl, G., Wilhelm, U.G. (eds.) WELCOM 2001. LNCS, vol. 2232, pp. 180–192. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Adomavicius, G., Tuzhilin, A.: Toward the next generation of recommender systems: A survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions. IEEE Trans. on Knowl. and Data Eng. 17(6), 734–749 (2005), doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2005.99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Agrahri, A.K., Manickam, D.A.T., Riedl, J.: Can people collaborate to improve the relevance of search results? In: RecSys 2008: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, pp. 283–286. ACM, New York (2008), http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1454008.1454052

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Balabanović, M., Shoham, Y.: Fab: content-based, collaborative recommendation. Commun. ACM 40(3), 66–72 (1997), http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/245108.245124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bizer, C.: Quality-Driven Information Filtering. In: The Context of Web-Based Information Systems. VDM Verlag, Saarbrücken (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Broder, A.: A taxonomy of web search. SIGIR Forum 36(2), 3–10 (2002), doi: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/792550.792552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Brusilovsky, P., Peylo, C.: Adaptive and intelligent Web-based educational systems. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 13(2), 159–172 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Drachsler, H., Hummel, H., Koper, R.: Recommendations for learners are different: Applying memory-based recommender system techniques to lifelong learning. In: Proceedings of the EC-TEL Conference, Crete, Greece (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Eyharabide, V., Gasparini, I., Schiaffino, S.N., Pimenta, M.S., Amandi, A.: Personalized e-learning environments: Considering students’ contexts. Education and Technology for a Better World 302, 48–57 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Felder, R.: Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education. Journal of Engineering Education 78(7), 674–681 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gheller, L.F.M., Pimenta, M.S.: An aditional user interface layer for search mechanisms (uma camada de interfaces adicional para mecanismos de busca). In: S.B. de Computao SBC (ed.) Proceedings of V Symposium on Human Factors in Computer Systems (IHC 2002), vol. 1, pp. 366–370 (2002) (in Portuguese)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Glover, E.J., Lawrence, S., Gordon, M.D., Birmingham, W.P., Giles, C.L.: Web search—your way. Commun. ACM 44(12), 97–102 (2001), doi: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/501317.501319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Goldberg, D., Nichols, D., Oki, B.M., Terry, D.: Using collaborative filtering to weave an information tapestry. Commun. ACM 35(12), 61–70 (1992), doi: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/138859.138867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Herlocker, J.L., Konstan, J.A.: Content-independent task-focused recommendation. IEEE Internet Computing 5(6), 40–47 (2001), doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/4236.968830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Knight, S., Burn, J.: Developing a Framework for Assessing Information Quality on theWorld Wide Web. Informing Science: International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline 8, 159–172 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kohlschütter, C., Nejdl, W.: A densitometric approach to web page segmentation. In: CIKM 2008: Proceeding of the 17th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 1173–1182. ACM, New York (2008), doi: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1458082.1458237

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee, T., Chun, J., Shim, J., Lee, S.G.: An ontology-based product recommender system for b2b marketplaces. Int. J. Electron. Commerce 11(2), 125–155 (2006), doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2753/JEC1086-4415110206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Loh, L., Lichtnow, D., Kampff, A.C., de Oiveira, J.P.M.: Recommendation of complementary material during chat discussions. Knowledge Management & E-Learning 2(4) (2010) (to be appear)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Loh, S., Garin, R.S., Lichtnow, D., Borges, T., Rodrigues, R., Simões, G., Amaral, L., Primo, T.: Analyzing web chat messages for recommending items from a digital library. In: ICEIS, vol. (4), pp. 41–48 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Martins, B., Silva, M.J.: Language identification in web pages. In: SAC 2005: Proceedings of the 2005 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, pp. 764–768. ACM, New York (2005), doi: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1066677.1066852

  21. Martins, T., Ghiraldelo, C., Nunes, M., Oliveira Jr, O.: Readability formulas applied to textbooks in brazilian portuguese. Notas do ICMSC-USP, Série Computação 28, 11 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mcnee, S.M., Konstan, J.A. (Adviser): Meeting user information needs in recommender systems. Ph.D. thesis, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  23. McNee, S.M., Kapoor, N., Konstan, J.A.: Don’t look stupid: avoiding pitfalls when recommending research papers. In: CSCW 2006: Proceedings of the 2006 20th Anniversary Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 171–180. ACM, New York (2006), doi: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1180875.1180903

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Middleton, S.E., Shadbolt, N.R., De Roure, D.C.: Ontological user profiling in recommender systems. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 22(1), 54–88 (2004), doi: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/963770.963773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. de Oliveira, J.P.M., de Lima, J.V., Gasparini, I., Pimenta, M.S., Brunetto, M.A.C., Proença Jr., M., Faggion, R.: Adaptive multimedia content delivery in adaptweb. In: XIII Taller Internacional de Software Educativo TISE, vol. 4, pp. 23–39 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Olsina, L., Rossi, G.: Measuring web application quality with webqem. IEEE MultiMedia 9(4), 20–29 (2002), doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MMUL.2002.1041945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Pipino, L.L., Lee, Y.W., Wang, R.Y.: Data quality assessment. Commun. ACM 45(4), 211–218 (2002), doi: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/505248.506010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Resnick, P., Varian, H.R.: Recommender systems. Commun. ACM 40(3), 56–58 (1997), doi: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/245108.245121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Santos, O.C.: A recommender system to provide adaptive and inclusive standard-based support along the e-learning life cycle. In: RecSys 2008: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, pp. 319–322. ACM, New York (2008), doi: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1454008.1454062

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Schickel-Zuber, V., Faltings, B.: Inferring user’s preferences using ontologies. In: AAAI 2006: Proceedings of the 21st National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 1413–1418. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Shardanand, U., Maes, P.: Social information filtering: algorithms for automating “word of mouth”. In: CHI 1995: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 210–217. ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., New York, NY, USA (1995), http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/223904.223931

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  32. Tang, T., McCalla, G.: Evaluating a smart recommender for an evolving e-learning system: A simulation-based study. In: Tawfik, A.Y., Goodwin, S.D. (eds.) Canadian AI 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3060, pp. 439–443. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  33. W3C: Complete list of web accessibility evaluation tools WAI (Web Accessibility Initiative) (2010), http://www.w3.org/WAI/RC/tools/complete

  34. W3C: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 (1999), http://www.w3.org/TR/WAI-WEBCONTENT

  35. Wang, R.Y., Strong, D.M.: Beyond accuracy: what data quality means to data consumers. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 12(4), 5–33 (1996)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Bry, F., Kraus, M.: Adaptive hypermedia made simple with HTML/XML style sheet selectors. In: De Bra, P.M.E., Nejdl, W. (eds.) AH 2004. LNCS, vol. 3137, p. 472. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  37. Warpechowski, M., Souto, M., de Oliveira, J.P.M.: Techniques for metadata retrieval of learning objects. In: SW-EL International Workshop on Applications of Semantic Web Technologies for E-Learning, with AH 2006. Citeseer, Dublin (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Ziegler, C.N., McNee, S.M., Konstan, J.A., Lausen, G.: Improving recommendation lists through topic diversification. In: WWW 2005: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 22–32. ACM, New York (2005), doi: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1060745.1060754

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lichtnow, D., Gasparini, I., Bouzeghoub, A., de Oliveira, J.P.M., Pimenta, M.S. (2011). Recommendation of Learning Material through Students´ Collaboration and User Modeling in an Adaptive E-Learning Environment. In: Daradoumis, T., Caballé, S., Juan, A.A., Xhafa, F. (eds) Technology-Enhanced Systems and Tools for Collaborative Learning Scaffolding. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 350. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19814-4_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19814-4_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-19813-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-19814-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics