Advertisement

Spatio-Temporal Analysis of Tehran’s Historical Earthquakes Trends

  • Mahdi HashemiEmail author
  • AliAsghar Alesheikh
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography book series (LNGC, volume 1)

Abstract

Iran is one of the most seismically active regions of the globe. The metropolis of Tehran is located at the southern foothills of the Alborz Mountains that are the northern branch of the Alpine-Himalayan orogeny in Iran. The extremely high density of population concentrated in the Tehran metropolis (with more than 12 million inhabitants) coupled with the fragility of houses and life-lines, highlight the urgency of a reliable assessment of fault activity in this city. Three main active fault zones exist in the vicinity of Tehran: North Tehran fault; Mosha fault; and Eyvanekey- Kahrizak fault. In this paper, a total of 894 historical earthquakes of the study area with magnitudes over 2.5 Richter were collected since 1900. Three scenarios were considered for faults. In each scenario, every earthquake was associated to its relevant fault, spatial and temporal analyses were done to reveal the spatial and temporal trend of fault activities. First the north-south and east-west trends of magnitudes of earthquakes were verified and showed no meaningful trends. Spatial dependence of magnitudes of earthquakes was described in terms of global Moran’s I and general G. The indices showed that the magnitudes of earthquakes were not clustered or spatially correlated. Ripley’s K function determined that earthquakes are clustered at multiple distances. The temporal analyses were used to extract temporal trends in each scenario. The results showed that eastern sections of all faults are more active and the majority of large earthquakes have occurred in the middle sections of the faults. It is also anticipated that the eastern section of the Mosha fault is more capable of generating large earthquakes than the other faults in the Tehran region. The results of this paper can be useful for extracting hazardous areas and risk zonation or forecasting earthquakes.

Keywords

Ground Motion Large Earthquake Earthquake Magnitude Historical Earthquake Eastern Section 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anselin L (1988) Spatial econometrics: methods and models. Kluwer Academic PublishersGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashtari M, Hatzfeld D, Kamalian N (2005) Microseismicity in the region of Tehran. J Tectonophysics 395:193– 208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cliff A, Ord J (1981) Spatial processes. PionGoogle Scholar
  4. Coburn A, Spence R (2002) Earthquake Protection (2nd edn). WileyGoogle Scholar
  5. Doloei J, Roberts R (2003) Crust and uppermost mantle structure of Tehran region from analysis of teleseismic P-waveform receiver functions. J Tectonophysics 364: 115–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) & Center for Earthquake and Environmental Studies of Tehran (CEST). (2000) Final report of the study on seismic microzoning of the Greater TehranGoogle Scholar
  7. Hamzehloo H, Vaccari F, Panza G (2007) Towards a reliable seismic microzonation in Tehran, Iran. J Engineering Geology 93: 1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jafari M A (2010) Statistical prediction of the next great earthquake around Tehran, Iran. J Geodynamics 49: 14–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jinhui Y, Jie C, XiWei X, Xulong W, Yonggang Z (2010) The characteristics of the landslides triggered by the Wenchuan Ms 8.0 earthquake from Anxian to Beichuan. J Asian Earth Sciences 37: 452–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kamp U, Growley BJ, Khattak GA, Owen LA (2008) GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping for the 2005 Kashmir earthquake region. J Geomorphology 101: 631–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Khazai B, Sitar N (2003) Evaluation of factors controlling earthquake-induced landslides caused by Chi-Chi earthquake and comparison with the Northridge and Loma Prieta events. J Engineering Geology 71:79–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lloyd CD (2007) Local models for spatial analysis.CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  13. Martini PD, Hessami K, Pantosti D, D’Addezio G, Alinaghi H, Ghafory-Ashtiani M (1998) A geologic contribution to the evaluation of the seismic potential of the Kahrizak fault (Tehran, Iran). J Tectonophysics 287: 187- I99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Moran P (1950) Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. J Biometrika 37: 17– 23Google Scholar
  15. O'Sullivan D, Unwin D (2003) Geographic information analysis. Wiley, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  16. Ping J, Green C, Zartman R, Bronson K (2004) Exploring spatial dependence of cotton yield using global and local autocorrelation statistics. J Field Crops Research 89: 219–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Reimann C, Filzmoser P, Garrett RG, Dutter R (2008) Statistical data analysis explained: Applied environmental statistics with R. WileyGoogle Scholar
  18. Reiter L (1991) Earthquake hazard analysis: issues and insights. Columbia University PressGoogle Scholar
  19. Rose A, Lim D (2002) Business interruption losses from natural hazards: conceptualGoogle Scholar
  20. and methodological issues in the case of the Northridge earthquake. J Environmental Hazards 4: 1–14Google Scholar
  21. Sadidkhouy A, Javan-Doloei G, Siahkoohi H (2008) Seismic anisotropy in the crust and upper mantle of the Central Alborz Region, Iran. J Tectonophysics 456: 194–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Shabestari K T, Yamazaki F, Saita J, Matsuoka M (2004) Estimation of the spatial distribution of ground motion parameters for two recent earthquakes in Japan. J Tectonophysics 390: 193– 204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Shafiee A, Azadi A (2007) Shear-wave velocity characteristics of geological units throughout Tehran City, Iran. J Asian Earth Sciences 29: 105–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Yaghmaei-Sabegh S, Lam NT (2010) Ground motion modelling in Tehran based on the stochastic method. J Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 30: 525–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Zafarani H, Noorzad A, Ansari A, Bargi K (2009) Stochastic modeling of Iranian earthquakes and estimation of ground motion for future earthquakes in Greater Tehran. J Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 29: 722–741CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Geospatial Information SystemsK.N. Toosi University of TechnologyTehranIran

Personalised recommendations