Skip to main content

The Disintegration of the Concept of Sovereignty and the Energy Sector in the Europe

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Financial Aspects in Energy

Abstract

The concept of sovereignty in international law addresses the principle that a sovereign state, through its ruler or government has the right to determine and enforce the laws which it believes are appropriate for its own territory, and that it has the further right to protect its interests at an international level, whether those interests be from a trade or security perspective. However, the concept of sovereignty operates within a broader framework of international law, part of which is the rule of law in international affairs. This involves the existence of a comprehensive system of law which provides predictability as to the legal consequences of conduct, and the effective and impartial application of the law. This then relies upon the ‘adoption’ of a form of sociality, which implies that sovereign states will act in a manner which maximises optimal co-operation between regimes and/or governmental structures. The European Union (EU) has sought, by virtue of the notion of legislative networks to dissolve the concept of individual state sovereignty, thus weakening the ability of sovereign states to determine that which is most appropriate to its own territory, and seeking the imposition of policies and laws which arguably reflect common interests, such as the development of the energy sector. However, the recent global financial and economic crises have highlighted that economic co-operation is far more fragile and problematic than previously thought, and this combined with the fact that energy sources are largely located in sovereign states not part of the EU, some of which have a high ranking of political risk, arguably poses a new and real problem. This chapter argues that the concept of sovereignty is central to sustainable energy policy development in the EU. Accordingly there will be an examination of the concept of sovereignty, its relationship with political risk, and this will be followed by an econometric analysis by using country risk oil industry stock market data and related political risk indicators. The reader should note that this paper is primarily written from a legal perspective, so the language and concepts as used throughout is reflective of this perspective. Furthermore, inclusion of the econometric analysis is illustrative of the notion that the energy sector is highly influenced by the actions of sovereign states and by the political risk attached to those actions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Treaty of Westphalia arose as a consequence of the Thirty Years War of 1618–1648. This war, described as probably the most disastrous war in Europe prior to the twentieth century was essentially a war between Protestant and Catholic Princes. The Protestant Princes opposed the Catholic Hapsburg Emperor and formed alliances with other foreign states. The war, whilst in appearance seemingly based on religious grounds, was driven more by the ambitions of an emergent France and the fading hegemony of an overextended Spain. The Treaty, signed at the conclusion of the War, is recognised as the starting point for the modern state system. It provides, inter alia, European principalities with the right to make foreign alliances and gave these states significant control over internal affairs. It is said that the Treaty was the progenitor of modern international law and represented the introduction of the association of the concept of sovereignty with the autonomy of the ‘state’ (Currie et al. 2007).

  2. 2.

    Netherlands v. United States of America 2 RIAA 83; 4 ILR 3 as cited in Blay et al. (2005).

  3. 3.

    Jean Bodin (1529/30–1596) was a lawyer, economist and one of the most influential political theorists of the sixteenth century. His seminal work was the Six Books of the Commonwealth, published in 1576, within which he systemised and defined a theory of sovereignty, and some regard him as the ‘father’ of sovereignty. For an interesting discussion of Bodin and his concept of sovereignty, see Beaulac (2003) The social power of Bodin’s ‘sovereignty; and international law.

  4. 4.

    Case C-7/68, Commission v. Italy [1968] ECR 1–633, 642.

  5. 5.

    International Country Risk Guide.

References

  • Beaulac S (2003) The social power of Bodin’s ‘Sovereignty’ and international law. Melbourne J Int Law 4. http://wjil.law.uni.melb.edu.au/issues/archive/2003(1)/01Bealuac.pdf. Accessed 26 May 2010

  • Blay S, Piotrowicz R, Tsamenyi M (eds) (2005) Public international law: an Australian perspective, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities (2006) Green paper – a European strategy for sustainable, competitive and secure energy. SEC 317. Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Cusimano MK (ed) (2000) Beyond sovereignty: issues for a global agenda. Bedford/St. Martin’s, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Currie JH, Currie C, Oosterveld V (2007) International law: doctrine, practice and theory. Irwin Law, Toronto, ON

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberlein B, Grande E (2005) Beyond delegation: transnational regulatory regimes and the EU regulatory state. J Eur Public Policy 1:89–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finon D, Locatelli C (2008) Russian and European gas interdependence: could contractual trade channel geopolitics. Energy Policy 36(2008):423–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ICRG (International Country Risk Guide) (2009) Political Risk Services Group. http://www.icrgonline.com?page.aspx?=icrgmethods

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson R (1999) Sovereignty in world politics: a glance at the conceptual and historical landscape. Pol Stud XLVII:431–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jayasuriya K (1999) Globalisation, law and the transformation of sovereignty: the emergence of global regulatory governance. Glob Leg Stud J 6:425–455

    Google Scholar 

  • Knill C, Lehmkuhl D (2002) The national impact of European Union regulatory policy: three Europeanization mechanisms. Eur J Pol Res 41(2002):255–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oxford English Dictionary (2009) Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabkin J (2000) Is EU policy eroding the sovereignty of non-member states? Chic J Int Law 1:273–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Robock S (1971) Political risk: identification and assessment. Columbia J World Bus 1971:11–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Root FR (1972) Analyzing political risks in international business. In: Kapoor A, Grub PD (eds) The multinational enterprise in transition. Darwin, Princeton, NJ, pp 354–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheepers M, Seebregts AD, de Jong J, Maters H (2007) EU standards for energy security of supply. Energy Research Centre of the Netherlands. ECN-E-07-004/CIEP. Clingendael International Energy Programs, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker N (1998) Sovereignty and differentiated integration in the European Union. Eur Law J 4(4):355–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weston VF, Sorge BW (1972) International managerial finance. Richard D. Irwin, Homewood, IL

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer Westaway .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Westaway, J., Simpson, J. (2011). The Disintegration of the Concept of Sovereignty and the Energy Sector in the Europe. In: Dorsman, A., Westerman, W., Karan, M., Arslan, Ö. (eds) Financial Aspects in Energy. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19709-3_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19709-3_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-19708-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-19709-3

  • eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics