Skip to main content

The Electricity Market, Day-Ahead Market and Futures Market

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Financial Aspects in Energy

Abstract

This chapter firstly provides an overview of the day-ahead and futures electricity markets of APX-ENDEX that is one of Europe’s most experienced energy exchanges, operating spot and futures markets for electricity and natural gas in the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and Belgium. An empirical analysis on the relationship between spot and futures electricity market of APX-ENDEX is then covered. We handle the most liquid year, which is 2008, of traded electricity futures contracts and we find that the market is in normal backwardation. Our regression analysis extents the Fama (J Monet Econ 1984;14:319–338) regressions and rejects the efficiency hypothesis. Our results indicate that the futures prices are not unbiased predictors of the future spot prices. Remarkably, the difference between the spot and futures prices is associated with the risk premium and the change in spot prices, supports the arbitrage and speculation opportunities in the market.

The authors are grateful to Mr. M. Rijke, director of Energy Data Company, Mr. D. Jong, Belgian Power Exchange (BELPEX), and Mrs. E. Sarr, European Power Exchange, EPEXspot for their advice and support for the data. We are also thankful for the detailed comments of Mr. M. Nijpels, Product Manager of APX BV, Amsterdam and Mr. P. Pottuijt, Senior Energy Consultant in the Dutch and Central Western European (CWE) energy market.

APX-ENDEX refers Amsterdam Power Exchange – European Energy Derivatives Exchange.

APX-ENDEX refers Amsterdam Power Exchange – European Energy Derivatives Exchange.

In September 2010, NYSE Euronext, the biggest operator of U.S. stock exchanges, formed a joint venture with APX Inc. to expand its trading volume in electricity, renewable energy and carbon dioxide allowances. The name of the new company is NYSE Blue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The concept is now planned to include Germany, Luxembourg and Norway. In addition, APX-ENDEX is also developing on the BritNed electricity cable, linking the Netherlands and the United Kingdom and will start to operate in 2011. This linkage proven to be successful will bring new liquidity to the UK electricity market.

  2. 2.

    The detailed discussion about the risk premium models is presented in Sect. 7.3.

  3. 3.

    See, Moosa and Al-Loughani (1995) and Crowder and Hamed (1993) for weak form market efficiency tests and speculation or arbitrage possibilities in commodity futures.

  4. 4.

    The information and tables in Sect. 2.2.1 are obtained from the following website of APX-ENDEX: http://www.apxendex.com/

  5. 5.

    In lots of 0.1 MW means, in pieces of 0.1 MW. In this vein: 0.1, 02 MW, etc.

  6. 6.

    The Electricity Act stipulates that all connected parties must arrange their own programme responsibility (PV). The System Code states that they can assign this responsibility to any legal entity recognized by TenneT and for so far they are recognized as program responsible party. 

  7. 7.

    For a proof of the cost-of-carry model using an arbitrage argument, see Hull (1993, Chap. 3).

  8. 8.

    Crowder and Hamed (1993) tests the arbitrage equilibruim in the crude oil market with cointegration analysis because of the nonstationary data. According to their analyses, spot rates, futures rates and risk free market rate should cointegrate if the riskless arbitrage opportunities are not possible. The expected return could only equal to the risk free rate if there is no arbitrage. But they did not support the arbitrage efficiency hypothesis.

Abbreviations

APX:

ENDEX Amsterdam Power Exchange – European Energy Derivatives Exchange

BE:

Belgium

CFD:

Contracts for difference

EEX:

European Energy Exchange

EU:

European Union

GMT:

Greenwich mean time

KW:

Kilowatt

MW:

Megawatt

MWh:

Megawatt hour

NL:

Netherlands

NYMEX:

New York Mercantile Exchange

OTC:

Over the counter

PV Program:

Responsibility (Dutch: Programma verantwoordelijkheid)

TenneT:

The Dutch transmission system operator

TSO:

Transmission system operator

UK:

United Kingdom

References

  • Arciniegas I, Barrett C, Marathe A (2003) Assessing the efficiency of US electricity markets. Utilities Policy 11:75–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bessembinder H, Lemmon M (2002) Equilibrium pricing and optimal hedging in electricity forward markets. J Finance 57:1347–1382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benth FE, Koekebakker S, Ollmar F (2007) Extracting and applying smooth forward curves from average-based commodity contracts with seasonal variation. J Derivatives 15(1):52–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bierbrauer M, Menn C, Rachev S, Trück S (2007) Spot and derivative pricing in the EEX power market. J Bank Finance 31:3462–3485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black F (1976) The pricing of commodity contracts. J Financ Econ 3:167–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borenstein S, Bushnel J, Knittel CR, Wolfram C (2001) Trading inefficiencies in California’s electricity markets. NBER Working Papers 8620, National Bureau of Economic Research, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Borovkova S, Geman H (2008) Forward curve modeling in commodity markets. In: Geman H (ed) Risk, management in commodity markets. Wiley Finance, Chichester, pp 9–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Botterud A, Bhattacharyya B, Ilic M (2002). Futures and spot prices, an analysis of the Scandinavian electricity market. Working Paper, MIT, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Botterud A, Kristiansen T, Ilic M (2010) The relationship between spot and futures prices in the Nord Pool electricity market. Energy Econ 32(5):967–978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brand H, Thorin E, Weber C, Madlener R, Kaufmann M, Kossmeier S (2002) Market analysis and tool for electricity trading. OSCOGEN Project Deliverable D5.1a, March

    Google Scholar 

  • Considine TJ, Larson DF (2001) Risk premiums on inventory assets: the case of crude oil and natural gas. J Futures Market 21(2):109–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowder WJ, Hamed A (1993) A cointegration test for oil futures market efficiency. J Futures Market 13(8):933–941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng SJ, Oren SS (2006) Electricity derivatives and risk management. Energy 31(6–7):940–953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorsman AB, Karan MB, Telatar E, Umutlu G (2010) Market coupling of electricity markets. Seventeenth Annual Conference of the Multinational Finance Society, Spain

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama EF (1970) Efficient capital markets: a review of theory and empirical work. J Finance 25:383–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama EF (1984) Forward and spot exchange rates. J Monetary Econ 14:319–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama FF, French KR (1987) Commodity futures prices: some evidence on forecast power, premiums and the theory of storage. J Bus 60(1):55–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furio D, Meneu V (2010) Expectations and forward risk premium in the Spanish deregulated power market. Energy Policy 38(2):784–793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorton G, Rouwenhorst KG (2006) Facts and fantasies about commodity futures. Financ Analysts J 62(2):47–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herraiz AC, Monroy CR (2009) Analysis of the efficiency of the Iberian power futures market. Energy Policy 37:3566–3579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hull JC (1993) Options, futures, and other derivative securities, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Kat HM, Oomen RCA (2006) What every investor should know about commodities, part I: univariate return analysis, Cass Business School Research Paper. SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=87836

  • Longstaff FA, Wang AW (2004) Electricity forward prices: a high-frequency empirical analysis. J Finance 59(4):1877–1900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucia J, Schwartz E (2002) Electricity prices and power derivatives: evidence from the Nordic power exchange. Rev Deriv Res 5:5–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucia JJ, Torro H (2008) Short-Term electricity futures prices: evidence on the time-varying risk premium. Working Paper, Department of Financial Economics, University of Valencia, Feb. 2008, available at: http://www.ivie.es/downloads/docs/wpasec/wpasec-2008-08.pdf

  • Marckhoff J, Wimschulte J (2009) Locational price spreads and the pricing of contracts for difference: evidence from the Nordic market. Energy Econ 31:257–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milonas NT, Henker T (2001) Price spread and convenience yield behavior in the international oil market. Appl Financ Econ 11:23–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moosa IA, Al-Loughani NE (1995) The effectiveness of arbitrage and speculation in the crude oil futures market. J Futures Market 15(2):167–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pietz M (2009) Risk premia in the German electricity futures market. Working Paper, Technical University of Munich. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1400120

  • Pilipovic D (1998) Energy risk, 1st edn. McGraw-Hill Professional, New York, NY, p 248. ISBN 0786312319

    Google Scholar 

  • Pindyck RS (2001) The dynamics of commodity spot and futures markets: a primer. Energy J 22(3):1–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Shawky H, Marathe A, Barrett C (2003) A first look at the empirical relation between spot and futures electricity prices in the United States. J Futures Mark 23:931–955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sioshansi FP, Altman A (1998) Wholesale power marketing in restructured electricity markets. Energy Policy 26(14):1099–1104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei SZC, Zhu Z (2006) Commodity convenience yield and risk premium determination: the case of the U.S. natural gas market. Energy Econ 28:523–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkens S, Wimschulte J (2007) The pricing of electricity futures: evidence from the European energy exchange. J Futures Mark 27:387–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang H, Zhang Y, Liu S, Luo X (2009) Empirical research on efficiency of the electricity futures market. Int J Emerg Electr Power Syst 10(2):1–15

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Goknur Umutlu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Umutlu, G., Dorsman, A., Telatar, E. (2011). The Electricity Market, Day-Ahead Market and Futures Market. In: Dorsman, A., Westerman, W., Karan, M., Arslan, Ö. (eds) Financial Aspects in Energy. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19709-3_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19709-3_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-19708-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-19709-3

  • eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics