Abstract
Multidisciplinary Design Optimization deals with engineering problems composed of several sub-problems – called disciplines – that can have antagonist goals and thus require to find compromise solutions. Moreover, the sub-problems are often multiobjective optimization problems. In this case, the compromise solutions between the disciplines are often considered as compromises between all objectives of the problem, which may be not relevant in this context. We propose two alternative definitions of the compromise between disciplines. Their implementations within the well-known NSGA-II algorithm are studied and results are discussed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Ordered sets which are not necessarily antisymmetric.
References
Better M., Glover F., Kochenberger G., Wang H.: Simulation optimization: application in risk management. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making7(4):571–587 (2008).
Deb K.: Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. Wiley (2001). 518 p.
Ehrgott M.: Multicriteria optimization. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2nd edition (2005). 323 p.
Engau A., Wiecek M.M.: 2D decision-making for multicriteria design optimization. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization34(4):301–315 (2007).
Fonseca C., Fleming P.: Genetic algorithms for multiobjective optimization: formulation discussion and generalization. In : Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, pp. 416–423, San Francisco, CA, USA (1993).
Goldberg D.E.: Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts (1989). 432 p.
Guédas B.: Proposition de compromis pour le calcul de solutions préférées à l’aide d’un algorithme évolutionnaire multiobjectif en optimisation multidisciplinaire. Ph.D. Thesis, École Centrale de Nantes, France (2010).
Guédas B., Dépincé P., Gandibleux X.: Vers une notion de compromis en optimisation multidisciplinaire multiobjectif. In: Book of abstracts of the ROADEF 2009 Conf., Nancy, France (2009).
Tosserams S., Etman L.F.P., Rooda J.E.: A classification of methods for distributed system optimization based on formulation structure. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization39(5):503–517 (2009).
Gunawan S., Farhang-Mehr A., Azarm S.: Multi-level multi-objective genetic algorithm using entropy to preserve diversity. In: Fonseca C.M., Fleming P., Zitzler E., Deb K., Thiele L. (eds) Evolutionary Multicriterion Optimization, LNCS 2632, pp. 148–161 (2003). Springer, Berlin Heidelberg.
Rabeau S., Dépincé P., and Bennis F.: Collaborative optimization of complex systems: a multidisciplinary approach. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing1(4):209–218 (2007).
Srinivas N., Deb K.: Multiobjective optimization using nondominated sorting in genetic algorithm. Evolutionary Computation2(3):221–248 (1994).
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the regional council of the Pays de la Loire (France), MILES project, for their support of this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Guédas, B., Gandibleux, X., Dépincé, P. (2011). Compromise Based Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization Algorithm for Multidisciplinary Optimization. In: Shi, Y., Wang, S., Kou, G., Wallenius, J. (eds) New State of MCDM in the 21st Century. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 648. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19695-9_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19695-9_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-19694-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-19695-9
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)