Advertisement

Hazard and Risk Assessment

  • Ramesha Chandrappa
  • Sushil Gupta
  • Umesh Chandra Kulshrestha
Chapter

Abstract

Development planning usually does not consider climate change. As a consequence, disasters cause economic and ecologic disruption during disasters. Right from the early stages, planners should include probable hazards due to changing climate. Proper planning can reduce damage from the extreme events due to climate change. This chapter discusses some fundamentals which could help planners to save citizens, economy and ecology by consequences of changing climate.

References

  1. Ashton G, ed., 1986: River and lake ice engineering, Water Resources Publications, Littleton, CoGoogle Scholar
  2. British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC), 2010: ‘2.5m people affected’ by Pakistan floods officials say <http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-south-asia-10834414> retrieved on 22. Sept 2010
  3. Burton I, Kates R.W and White G.F., 1978: The Environment as Hazard (New York: Oxford University Press, 1978Google Scholar
  4. Das P; Chutiya D; Hazarika N, 2009: Adjusting to floods on the Brahmaputra plains, Assam, India. Kathmandu: International Centre for Integrated Mountain DevelopmentGoogle Scholar
  5. Department of Regional Development and Environment Executive Secretariat for Economic and Social Affairs Organization of American States, With support from the Office of Foreign Disaster Assistance United States Agency for International Development (DRDEESESAOAS), 1991: Primer on Natural Hazard Management in Integrated Regional Development Planning.Google Scholar
  6. FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency), 2003: Guidelines and specifications for flood hazard mapping partners, Annexure E: Guidance for Shallow Flooding Analyses and Mapping.Google Scholar
  7. GoI (Government of India), 1980: Report on national commission on floods. New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  8. IRADe (Integrated Research and Action for Development), National Circumstances of India Geographic, Demographic, Socio-Economic And Environmental Governance Background, downloaded from www.irade.org/natcom.pdf on 22.Sept.2010
  9. IPCC, 2007: Fourth Assessment Report. Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.Google Scholar
  10. Michael J. Hicks and Mark L. Burton, 2010: Preliminary Damage Estimates for Pakistani Flood, Center for Business And eConoMiC reseArCH, BALL stAte universityGoogle Scholar
  11. Organization of American States (OAS), 1969: Physical Resource Investigations for Economic DevelopmentGoogle Scholar
  12. Reynolds J.M, 1998: ‘High-altitude glacial lake hazard assessment and mitigation: A Himalayan perspective.’ In Maund, JG; Eddleston, M (eds) Geohazards in Engineering Geology, Engineering Geology special publications No 15, pp 25–34. London: Geological SocietyCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Singh P, Ghose N, Chaudhary N, Hansda R, 2009: Life in the shadow of embankments – Turning lost lands into assets in the Koshi Basin of Bihar, India. Kathmandu: ICIMODGoogle Scholar
  14. Yamada, T, 1998: Glacier Lake and its outburst flood in the Nepal Himalaya, Monograph No 1. Tokyo: Japanese Society of Snow and Ice, Data Center for Glacier ResearchGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ramesha Chandrappa
    • 1
  • Sushil Gupta
    • 2
  • Umesh Chandra Kulshrestha
    • 3
  1. 1.Biomedical Waste SectionKarnataka State Pollution Control BoardBangaloreIndia
  2. 2.Risk Management Solutions IndiaNoidaIndia
  3. 3.School of Environmental SciencesJawaharlal Nehru UniversityNew DehliIndia

Personalised recommendations