Skip to main content

Open Source Software Development: Communities’ Impact on Public Good

  • Conference paper
Book cover Social Computing, Behavioral-Cultural Modeling and Prediction (SBP 2011)

Abstract

This study examines the innovation output of software development that produces public goods. We use resource dependence theory and collective action theory to explain the effects of interconnectedness on open source software (OSS) communities, and on contributions to public goods. We empirically test our proposals using an eight-year panel dataset on OSS projects based on the Eclipse Foundation, and conclude that interconnectedness negatively affects community mobilization and its contributions to public goods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. von Hippel, E., von Krogh, G.: Open source software and the ”private-collective” innovation model: Issues for organization science. Organization Science 14(2), 209–223 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hardin, G.: The Tragedy of the Commons. Science 162(3859), 1243–1248 (1968)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Olson, M.: The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Osterloh, M., Rota, S.: Open source software development–Just another case of collective invention? Research Policy 36(2), 157–171 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Oliver, P.E., Marwell, G., Teixeira, R.: A theory of the critical mass. I. Interdependence, group heterogeneity, and the production of collective action. American Journal of Sociology 91(3), 522–556 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Marwell, G., Oliver, P.E., Prahl, R.: Social networks and collective action: A theory of the critical mass. III. American Journal of Sociology 94(3), 502–534 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Monge, P.R., et al.: Production of Collective Action in Alliance-Based Interorganizational Communication and Information Systems. Organization Science 9(3), 411–433 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pfeffer, J., Salancik, G.R.: The external control of organizations: a resource dependence perspective, vol. xiii, p. 300. Harper & Row, New York (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Shah, S.: Motivation, governance, and the viability of hybrid forms in open source software development. Management Science 52(7), 1000–1014 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fulk, J., et al.: Connective and communal public goods in interactive communication systems. Communication Theory 6(1), 60–87 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Aldrich, H.: Resource Dependence and in Terorganiza Tional Relations: Local Employment Service Offices and Social Services Sector Organizations. Administration Society 7(4), 419–454 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Simon, H.A.: The sciences of the artificial. MIT Press, Cambridge (1996), 9780262691918

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lerner, J., Tirole, J.: Some simple economics of open source. The Journal of Industrial Economics 50(2), 197–234 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Haefliger, S., von Krogh, G.F., Spaeth, S.: Code Reuse in Open Source Software Development. Management Science 54(1), 180–193 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Baldwin, C.Y., Clark, K.B.: The Power of Modularity. In: Design Rules, vol. 1. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  16. MacCormack, A., Rusnak, J., Baldwin, C.Y.: Exploring the structure of complex software designs: An empirical study of open source and proprietary code. Management Science 52(7), 1015–1030 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. West, J., O’Mahony, S.: The Role of Participation Architecture in Growing Sponsored Open Source Communities, pp. 145–168. Carfax Pub. Co., Abingdon (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bechky, B.A.: Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organization Science 14(3), 312–330 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hars, A., Ou, S.: Working for free? Motivations for participating in open-source projects. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 6(3), 25–39 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hertel, G., Niedner, S., Herrmann, S.: Motivation of software developers in Open Source projects: an Internet-based survey of contributors to the Linux kernel. Research Policy 32(7), 1159–1177 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. von Krogh, G.F., Spaeth, S., Lakhani, K.: Community, joining, and specialization in open source software innovation: a case study. Research Policy 32(7), 1217–1241 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bartels, B.: Beyond fixed versus random effects: a framework for improving substantive and statistical analysis of panel, time-series cross-sectional, and multilevel data. The Society for Political Methodology (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Roebuck, M.C., Liberman, J.N.: Impact of Pharmacy Benefit Design on Prescription Drug Utilization: A Fixed Effects Analysis of Plan Sponsor Data. Health Services Research 44(3), 988–1009 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wooldridge, J.M.: Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. The MIT press, Cambridge (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Pesaran, M.H.: General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hoechle, D.: Robust standard errors for panel regressions with cross-sectional dependence. Stata Journal 7(3), 281 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ostrom, E.: Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge Univ. Pr., Cambridge (1990)

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Garriga, H., Spaeth, S., von Krogh, G. (2011). Open Source Software Development: Communities’ Impact on Public Good. In: Salerno, J., Yang, S.J., Nau, D., Chai, SK. (eds) Social Computing, Behavioral-Cultural Modeling and Prediction. SBP 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6589. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19656-0_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19656-0_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-19655-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-19656-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics