Skip to main content

Turkey’s Position towards International Water Law

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Turkey's Water Policy

Abstract

Turkey’s position towards transboundary water cooperation is widely perceived as being reluctant. This view mainly originates from disputes that arose over the Euphrates and Tigris rivers between Turkey, being the upstream country, and the downstream riparians, Syria and Iraq. In addition, Turkey’s vote against the 1997 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Non-navigational Uses of International Watercourses (UN Watercourses Convention) as well as Turkey’s refusal to discuss transboundary water issues within the context of the 2002 Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) Economic Forum explains the view of Turkey’s critics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For further details refer to the summaries of the OSCE 10th Economic Forum and of its respective preparatory meetings, available at http://www.osce.org/eea/documents.html.

  2. 2.

    Turkey is party to the UNECE Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution since 1983.

  3. 3.

    The UN Convention on the Non-Navigational Uses of International Watercourses was adopted by 103 votes in favour to 3 against (Turkey, China, and Burundi) with 27 abstentions on May 21st, 1997 in New York.

  4. 4.

    Compare UN General Assembly, 51st session: Summary Records of the 12th to 25th and 52nd to 62nd meetings: 6th Committee held at headquarters, New York between 17 September 1996 and 4 April 1997, U.N. Doc A/C.6/51/SR.12 and following.

  5. 5.

    See The Statement of Turkey: UN GAOR, 51st Session, 99th Plenary Meeting, U.N. Doc. A/51/PV.99 (1997), 5.

  6. 6.

    See U.N. Doc A/C.6/51/SR.62 (1997), 8.

  7. 7.

    See U.N. Doc. A/C.6/51/SR.61 (1997), 3.

  8. 8.

    Adopted in Barcelona, Spain, 16 February 1976; entered into force: 12 February 1978; amended: Barcelona, Spain, 9-10 June 1995. New Title: Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment and the Coastal Region of the Mediterranean (entered into force on 9 July 2004).

  9. 9.

    The Protocol for the Prevention of Pollution in the Mediterranean Sea by Dumping from Ships and Aircraft; the Protocol Concerning Cooperation in Preventing Pollution from Ships and, in Cases of Emergency, Combating Pollution of the Mediterranean Sea; the Protocol for the Protection of the Mediterranean Sea against Pollution from Land-Based Sources; the Protocol Concerning Specially Protected Areas and Biological Diversity in the Mediterranean; (in force) as well as the Protocol for the Protection of the Mediterranean Sea against Pollution Resulting from Exploration and Exploitation of the Continental Shelf and the Seabed and its Subsoil; and the Protocol on the Prevention of Pollution of the Mediterranean Sea by Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and their Disposal (pending).

References

  • Arancli S (2002) Biodiversity and natural resource management in Turkey. Paper presented at Environmental Connectivity: Protected Areas in the Mediterranean Context, Malaga, Spain, 26-28 September 2002

    Google Scholar 

  • Biswas A (2000) Presentation given at the CDG Conference on International Water Courses. Berlin 27th October 2000

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunnée J, Toope SJ (1997) Environmental security and freshwater resources: Ecosystem regime building. The American Journal of International Law, vol 91: 26-59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demeter B (2001) Schutz und Nutzung internationaler Binnengewässer – Zwei Rahmenkonventionen im Vergleich. Frankfurt am Main, Peter Lang

    Google Scholar 

  • DSI (2009) Turkey water report 2009. DSI General Directorate of State Hydraulic Works, Ankara. http://www.dsi.gov.tr/english/pdf_files/TurkeyWaterReport.pdf. Accessed 25 May 2010

  • European Commission (2005) Regular report on Turkey’s progress towards accession, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Hey E (1998) The Watercourses Convention: To what extent does it provide a basis for regulating uses of international watercourses? Review of European Community and International Environmental Law, 7 (3): 291-300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kibaroglu A (2002) Building a regime for the waters of the Euphrates-Tigris river system. Kluwer Law International, London The Hague New York

    Google Scholar 

  • McCaffrey S (2001) The contribution of the UN Convention on the law of the non-navigational uses of international watercourses. Int. J. Global Environmental Issues, vol. 1, no 3/4: 250-263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Foreign Affairs (2010) Personal communication with the officials, Ankara

    Google Scholar 

  • Rende M (2004) Turkey’s water resources management and transboundary water policy. Speech delivered at the 4th Biennal Rosenberg International Forum, Ankara, 2004

    Google Scholar 

  • Rende M (2007) Water transfer from Turkey to water stressed countries in the Middle East. In: Shuval H, Dweik H (eds) Water resources in the Middle East: Israeli Palestinian water issues — From conflict to cooperation., Springer, Berlin, pp 167-169

    Google Scholar 

  • Samsunlu A, Maktav D, Kapdaslii S (1996) Transboundary water issues between Greece-Bulgaria and Turkey: the case of Meric / Evros River. In: Bogardi I (ed) Transboundary water resources management. Institutional and engineering approaches. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Saner E (2006) Turkiye, Su ve Uluslararasi Boyutu. Paper presented at the Union of Chambers of Turkish Engineers and Architects- Proceedings of Congress of Water Policies, Ankara

    Google Scholar 

  • Turkish Ministry of Foreign Affairs (2003) The looming water shortgage and Turkey’s water management in a transboundary context. NATO Parliament Assembly, 48th session. Istanbul, 15-19 November 2002

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP (2004) Black Sea Ecosystem Recovery Project - Phase 2. Project Document. http://www.gefweb.org/Documents/Council_Documents/GEF_C23/IW_-_Regional_-_Black_Sea_Ecosystem_-_Project_Document.pdf. Accessed 03 June 2005

  • Wouters P (1999) The legal response to international water conflicts: the UN Watercourses Convention and beyond. German Yearbook of International Law 42: 292-336

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Annika Kramer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kramer, A., Kibaroglu, A. (2011). Turkey’s Position towards International Water Law. In: Kramer, A., Kibaroglu, A., Scheumann, W. (eds) Turkey's Water Policy. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19636-2_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics